I know it's just a short way of saying white supremacist.
Ok.
If you had read the study he was literally saying Italians are genetically inferior and Northern Europeans should not race mix with them.
I did read it, and he wasn't implying they were non-White just a lower-tier type of White.
But they weren't saying German and Scandinavian were genetically inferior and should not race mix with them.
Doesn't change the fact that they were discriminated against & seen as "outsiders" just like all other White groups(except Anglos) were treated in the US.
I'm not creating a strawman, I'm pointing out SFcel hypocrisy and proving my point that Africans low iq have nothing to do with their genetics but rather with socioeconomic conditions.
You were: You used South Europeans(which you clearly know by now I am partially) in order to try & make a new kind of argument.
The point is, Africans in developed countries have been given tons of opportunities in order to uplift themselves -which virtually no other group has been given- yet they continue to behave the exact same way.
Also, look at this:
Data which they examined found that even after differences in socio-economic factors are accounted for, little difference exists.
Also, it seems that a correlation exists between Africans who've achieved & European DNA in them.
Biased studies funded by SFcels, which clearly don't have a conflict of interest, right.
No, tons of studies I have shown are not funded by "SFcels" jfl.
Also, not every White Nationalist is an Incel: Most -just like members of all political ideologies- are sexhavers, though probably a bit more on the mentally unwell side of things.
According to "
IQ and the Wealth of Nations" a minimum IQ of 90 is needed in order to simply just maintain a nation: Even then, that's just maintaining it, not actually developing or improving it in anyway.
And yeah Ik you're about to go on about how it's all due to "colonialism" when Europeans were the first to build schools there: Even with education in the United States, Blacks fundamentally underperform.
Trust me poor people don't have enough money to immigrate. As a lower middle class person I can tell only upper middle class and richer than those have the ability to immigrate.
Your circumstances do not apply to every immigrant in the history of immigration: Most immigrants to the US back then from Europe were very poor.
When there good leaders aren't killed by the western agencies and replaced by puppets, so west can steal more resources.
You mean the Elites who run the West? Newsflash, but we don't like them either & most of them are Jews or associated with them.
Was china ever colonised(only some parts or islands were colonised most of China remained uncolonized) or were there leaders ever killed by certain agencies. And mainland China was never colonized.
Well they were invaded brutally by the Japanese & fought a civil war, in which the US & USSR supported the Nationalists & Communists respectively.
So yeah, China did get messed with quite a bit; yet look at it now.
@Confessor
It's not; I'm making what's called an observation.
Have you seen the pictures does it look likes there skulls don't have the space or less space for frontal lobe.
it makes sense: Skull structures determine facial features, so they will have an impact on how areas of the brain form & develop.
There aren't any studies that say that African skull shape causes less development of frontal lobe.
You are correct: There are none, but based on other factors & logical thinking it may be the case.
Yeah, because of the same mainstream scientists you are using a phone car or many other things, there research have practical applications but there research that goes against your SFcel copes is bullshit. If there research was bullshit our cars, fans, rockets and phones wouldn't work.
I gave you tons of evidence and you are still coping.
This isn't any kind of argument: Not every scientist is the same & works in the same fields, they aren't all working or studying the same thing, etc.
And it would make sense they want cars, phones, etc to work, since they need the populace to use it to work.
Not opinions or facts but pseudoscience.
They are my opinions, which I am reinforcing with facts.
That isn't supported by any evidence and whole of scientific community rejects all the "facts" you give. And it's still misinformation.
Ah yes, the (((scientific community)))
Oh and also, tons of other evidence points towards it.
Purpose of human genome project was to map human genome not to prove that all races are genetically equal.
You do realize people can have certain agendas behind stuff? And oftentimes, they dilute what they are saying for various reasons.
It just so happened to be after mapping the whole Human Genome we found all races are genetically equal there is no superior race.
No they aren't:
I'm not blindly trusting the human genome project we developed many functional medicines that works, with the help of human genome project.
The point I was making, is that since it was funded directly by the US gov which has many agendas within it(including promoting multiculturalism & multiracialism)
The HapMap Project have found that there are only 70 SNP genetic variations out of a million amongst different populations.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15507999/
https://www.researchgate.net/public...larities_Within_and_Between_Human_Populations
Lewontins fallacy.
Science have proven there are genetic variations amongst different population but there are more genetic variations within populations rather than among population.
That's because they're examining the population from an inwards perspective, not compared to others.
I shared an image addressing this a but further up.
And if we follow that definition then we would have to divide humanity into hundreds of races.
Racial Realism connects to culture as well: A big reason I consider all native Europeans as "White" is due to the various cultural links between them.
Everything that goes against SFcel copes is the juice jfl
And anything that goes against your Egalitarian narrative is "SFcel cope" jfl.
None of them were Asians, if a scientist have Asian name it doesn't mean research have been done in a Asian institution.
Science was less biased than, wow then you have to learn a lot about scientific history.
So modern Science isn't at all?
Also, Science back then at least encouraged free-thinking & for individuals to develop their own theories & principles.
Tells me alot about your "scientific" understanding.
Don't be passive aggressive: If you want smoke, just ask for it.
Only for 60 years and you expect them to suddenly improve drastically
It took Japan only 20 years to go from a Feudal samurai culture into a modernized Empire that took-on & defeated Russia; China had their Great Leap Forward & improved rapidly;
it takes time and not to mention how CIA sabotaged there neighbourhoods.
You do realize the CIA did this to Whites also in fact? Looks at Appalachia at the such, they're awful run down places but yet:
@Confessor this could add onto what you said earlier.
If you would give them opportunities they would like every other race.
They literally have been given these & continue to get them: I understand, improvement/change doesn't just occur overnight, but I have yet to see any Blacks consistently attempt to improve their education, life standards, etc.
And I already showed you many black inventors.
www.blackinventionmyths.com
The way you refer to biased scientific studies funded by SFcels and outdated information as scientific facts.
And I could say the very same about what you show: In fact, most of those "studies" are funded by people with an agenda such as bill gates, various industries and businesses, etc.
First Mali, Kushites(Sudan not west Africa) and Ghanan empires were in west Africa.
We've already spoken about this: They took heavy influence from MENA & Islam, whilst failing to even grasp the concepts fully of MENA & Islamic civilizational values.
And secondly even if we agree that Akusimites were "substantially" influenced by MENAs genetically,
Which is true- tons of data I showed(and others you can find online) shows they have a good amount of it in them.
why couldn't the "superior" and pure whites of Nothern Europe couldn't build a civilization at that time.
Europeans already had civilizations at the time in South Europe, and many of the North Europeans at the time lived in more Nomadic societies, not purely tribalistic ones.
K.
Oh the irony, I have yet to make a single thread about SFcels unlike you who have made several threads about non-whites.
All because you haven't made a thread doesn't mean we live rent-free in your head; I've seen you make tons of comments relating to this.
Not everything but almost 90 percent of problems
So not everything, but almost everything. Got it.
faced by global south are the fault of European colonization and neo colonialism.
"muh everything is Europes fault"
Even if it is, have you seen how literally every other Global South country has drastically improved since decolonization(IE South-East Asia) yet Africa is now even worse?
There leaders weren't butchered
China had a whole full-scale civil war & also got raped hard by the Japanese; not to mention meddling from the US & USSR.
and mainland China wasn't even colonized.
Europeans had various influence zones in China, which by your logic would have
Again where did Europe got the money to fuel its industrialization, which in return created jobs for average Europeans which benefitted them.
And why were Europeans able to industrialize? Because of the innovation to do so; Welsh coal mines also provided a lot to industrialization & effectively allowed it to take off.
And all your 18th century onwards (modern infrastructure) is built on colonial wealth which in return benefitted the average European. Not even close to how much average inhabitants of global south suffers.
And where did the designs come from? Also, they were based upon classical architecture.
So somehow every single piece of infrastructure we have is because of colonial wealth? Can you provide some source?
I don't think so cotton, spices, gold, coal and diamonds were any less valuable, i would even argue they were even more valuable back than. And many more resources.
But were they put into usage? Did they utilize them to industrialize?
I was talking about MKO Abiola, Thomas Sankara, Patrice Lumumba and many others.
Ok.
And Gaddafi envisioned a United Africa.
One of the things I dislike him for: He should have pushed for a more Pan-Arabic/MENA identity or some sort of North African Arabic one.
Other than that, he was based & a good opposition to NATO.
www.jstor.org
: Seriously dude stop being raycis!1!1!"
