Only two post and been here since 2018
Comedy
He was is saying Italians were are inferior racial stock of Europe not Whites, cause we all know at that time Italians weren't considered white at that time.
Idk it seems like you are close to getting it, it means discrimination based on your race and ethnic background is bad and racial science is bullshit, as proved how Italians IQ increased when there socioeconomic conditions improved.
I didn't know you were Southern European. I'm proving my point about how blacks IQ have nothing to do with their genes but rather with their socioeconomic conditions by using Southern Europeans as an example.
Which opportunities are you taking about? Whites were literally given a headstart to every other race.
Again you can't expect Africans to suddenly turn into geniuses overnight. And also learn about stereotype threat. And Standardized Testing aren't a great tool to measure intelligence. They have a good reasoning but you need to understand intelligence is way more nuanced and multifaceted.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat#:~:text=Stereotype threat is considered by,in the field of mathematics.
The studies literally is taking about factors influencing type 2 diabetes. And even if we take what you said as truth then why are there unsuccessful and poor whites at all, if European ancestry/genes is the ultimate factor for someone's success than all the Europeans and people with significant European ancestry should mega geniuses and successful people, but that is not the case. And correlation doesn't equal to causation. Jfl your picture say studies while only citing one study which have nothing to do with what that picture claims.
You are literally misrepresenting the studies that are not funded by SFcels to fit your narrative. Read the studies and corresponding studies and their responses.
Does them having sex makes their point valid?
Functional IQ is 80, no there's no empirical evidence saying you need 90 IQ to maintain a nation. Other factors such as political stability, economic policies, and social infrastructure play significant roles in a countries development which always get destroyed by colonialism and neocolonialism.
Yes it's because of colonialism and neocolonialism. Of course your wouldn't know cause you benefit from it.
Of course poor people have the money to buy tickets of ship for their whole family and also poor people have the money rent or buy a house in a totally new country.
Not brutally at all.
Civil war is far less damageable for countries as compared to colonialism and neocolonialism.
How many Chinese leaders were murdered by western agencies?
No empirical evidence for that.
Biased views and preconceived notions not logical thinking at all.
But all use the same scientific methods. And gene therapy and many others technology proves that mainstream scientists are right about genetics.
We have made medicines with help of Human Genome Project.
Couldn't see any facts only SFcel funded studies or gross misrepresentation of studies.
SFcel Cope
Cope, if they diluted or had agendas behind it they would have been proven wrong, which they aren't. Then why their medicines and technologies works.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/#:~:text=The proportion of human genetic,classification of individuals into populations.The point I was making, is that since it was funded directly by the US gov which has many agendas within it(including promoting multiculturalism & multiracialism)
Lewontins fallacy.
That's because they're examining the population from an inwards perspective, not compared to others.
I shared an image addressing this a but further up.
View attachment 1072240
Racial Realism connects to culture as well: A big reason I consider all native Europeans as "White" is due to the various cultural links between them.
And anything that goes against your Egalitarian narrative is "SFcel cope" jfl.
So modern Science isn't at all?
Also, Science back then at least encouraged free-thinking & for individuals to develop their own theories & principles.
Don't be passive aggressive: If you want smoke, just ask for it.
It took Japan only 20 years to go from a Feudal samurai culture into a modernized Empire that took-on & defeated Russia; China had their Great Leap Forward & improved rapidly;
You do realize the CIA did this to Whites also in fact? Looks at Appalachia at the such, they're awful run down places but yet:
View attachment 1072190
@Confessor this could add onto what you said earlier.
They literally have been given these & continue to get them: I understand, improvement/change doesn't just occur overnight, but I have yet to see any Blacks consistently attempt to improve their education, life standards, etc.
Black Invention Myths
www.blackinventionmyths.com
And I could say the very same about what you show: In fact, most of those "studies" are funded by people with an agenda such as bill gates, various industries and businesses, etc.
We've already spoken about this: They took heavy influence from MENA & Islam, whilst failing to even grasp the concepts fully of MENA & Islamic civilizational values.
Which is true- tons of data I showed(and others you can find online) shows they have a good amount of it in them.
Europeans already had civilizations at the time in South Europe, and many of the North Europeans at the time lived in more Nomadic societies, not purely tribalistic ones.
K.
All because you haven't made a thread doesn't mean we live rent-free in your head; I've seen you make tons of comments relating to this.
So not everything, but almost everything. Got it.
"muh everything is Europes fault"
Even if it is, have you seen how literally every other Global South country has drastically improved since decolonization(IE South-East Asia) yet Africa is now even worse?
China had a whole full-scale civil war & also got raped hard by the Japanese; not to mention meddling from the US & USSR.
Europeans had various influence zones in China, which by your logic would have
Again, the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin's analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species, and Edwards' critique does not contradict that interpretation. Both studies are compatible with eachother, it isn't what you think it is again you are misrepresenting scientific information, to push a certain narrative.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/#:~:text=The proportion of human genetic,classification of individuals into populations
Again, there are genetic variations found amongst populations through which we can determine their ancesty they are minuscule compared to variations found within populations. And FFS there are genetic variations even among identical twins. Do you really believe every human is 100% is genetically identical? And again those variations have nothing to do with a black person's iq and cognitive abilities. The point is no race is genetically superior. And I already have written good response above.
If you had read the study they are saying genetic variations exist ( and they have nothing to do with iq or a race being superior) between different population as I already gave you a study saying that there are more genetic variations amongst as compared to between, these genetic variations are so minuscule that if we embrace them we have to divide humanity into hundreds upon hundreds of races, which goes against the theory of race which divide humans into black and white populations. The claim of race theory is to find large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Which this studies says nothing about. Why are you misrepresenting scientific information?
What it has to do with whites being superior and blacks being inferior?
This video shows how unbiased was science back then.
View: https://youtu.be/IuDuKOSQXgk?si=-9P6gIlmCt-Mv2Z_
I'm not being passive aggressive, you really have to learn about how biased science back then.
Were Japan's neighbourhoods supplied with snow and crack by CIA and how many Chinese leaders have been assassinated by Western Agencies.
Source?
I haven't seen so then it must be the case for every other black person living.
You know what that we don't invent things out of thin air, invention is very similar to like evolution. We say they invented because they were the most close to the modern ones. If we apply the logic of that bogus website, all the computational and electronic inventions should be credited to Indians, because Indians were the first one to use zeros as a mathematical number.
Of course a study that mapped human genome have agenda behind it, ofcoucrse every other race is planned against white people.
Ghanans and kushites were heavily influenced by islamic civilization jfl.
Ironic you live rent free in my head cause I go around making threads on whites.
Rwanda, Nigeria and Zimbabwe etc are fairly developed.
Yes, Europeans infrastructure is built on colonial what does it architectural style have to do with it being built upon stolen money. And research where did steel for Eiffel tower came from.
Last edited:
So what
Shut the fuck up you stupid diabetic poojeet.
You need to be permabanned from here without chance of ban appeal.
Angry much, cause I am putting down down SFcel copes with facts not like those SFcels copers who post pictures that misrepresent studies without even reading those studies.
I thought this is an incel forum not stormfront, and seriously dude you need actual mental help stop being a self loather.
Inceldom is a lot about genetic and racial hierarchies and inequalities.
There are white incels too. And ethnic sexhavers idk how it makes them superior.
much much less than ethnics. curries and chinks all like sexless lives. their marriages are sexless.
That's more of a social problem.
genetic problem you bluepilled retard!
How's forcing foids to arrange marriage and fuck the guys they don't wanna fuck a genetic problem?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
