I finally have proof I'm subhuman

[itsOVER]

if you are going to take a shitty picture with poor lighting and one that doesn't accentuate your features, then you will look unattractive. Pic with Proper lighting captures your true features and would be a better indicator of attractiveness as its a closer approximation to how you might look IRL. Wearing unflattering clothes will make you look unattractive to females. Rules of attraction for women are very different than they are for men. For women, its not solely your looks which make you attractive, but a combination of looks status and confidence. Dressing nicely is a way of signaling status and even confidence. This is why you were able to barely edge out incelman in attractiveness rating.

This sounds like redpill cope tbh. Confidence = looks. It's all about looks in the end.

The upshot of it all is: don't make every one of your tinder pics a bedroom selfie, and probably don't use a bedroom selfie as your first photo. I'd have thought we all know that we should try take 'flattering' pictures for our tinder accounts and for online dating...it kinda goes without saying. But the idea that good lighting and photo effects can boost you 5 points in a womans mind is just fucking lol, and that's the impression you'll get if you use photofeeler.

 

[jamho22]

The most accurate results is probably trying your photos on Tinder. That's probably all that matters, if girls want to fuck you or not, not that they "like your photo."

photofeeler is pretty good at letting you know how well you will do on tinder. If you get an attractive rating of 99% or 100%, chances are very high that you will consistently get matches on tinder.

 

[itsOVER]

With ALL my surgery (not just the HT, but jaw/chin/eye surgery) I'd probably make it to 5/10. I've always said you can looksmax your way up 1 PSL point, but no more unless you have an obvious deformity. 5/10, alas, just aint enough in the west (especially not when you're fucking 5ft 7). However, I'll rope before I do the gymcel cope.
Point of this thread though is photofeeler is bullshit. Their ratings vary too much from photo to photo.

With your looks, don't even think about roping.

I'm not gonna rope. I just meant...I'm DEFINITELY not gonna gymcel, lol.

Yes it's free but you have to wait a long time to get results (basically you build up 'karma' by voting on other peoples photos, and in turn you spend karma when they vote on yours. You'll only get 1 or 2 extra votes a day normally, so if you want a 'precise' rating (i.e. 40+ votes) expect to be waiting a while.
Think it's all cope though personally. Photomaxing gets you more on there than your looks ever will.

The most accurate results is probably trying your photos on Tinder. That's probably all that matters, if girls want to fuck you or not, not that they "like your photo."

Agreed. I'm 95% sure incelman (with his OP photo) would easily beat my photofeeler photo on tinder...because on tinder people aren't so much judging the quality of the photo, they're judging attractiveness. That's why I say photofeeler isn't a great predictor of attractiveness.

 

[CopingGymcel]

Agreed. I'm 95% sure incelman (with his OP photo) would easily beat my photofeeler photo on tinder...because on tinder people aren't so much judging the quality of the photo, they're judging attractiveness. That's why I say photofeeler isn't a great predictor of attractiveness.

I am pretty sure of that, too. While you're not ugly, you wouldn't do too well on Tinder in the west. You do well in Asia at least, so you get laid, which is all that matters. You just need to get your ass back to Asia asap and stop wasting time in the west after your degree is done with.

Any high trust 4+ white guy in Asia will do well with women. The taller, the better of course.

 

[jamho22]

This sounds like redpill cope tbh. Confidence = looks. It's all about looks in the end.

The upshot of it all is: don't make every one of your tinder pics a bedroom selfie, and probably don't use a bedroom selfie as your first photo. I'd have thought we all know that we should try take 'flattering' pictures for our tinder accounts and for online dating...it kinda goes without saying. But the idea that good lighting and photo effects can boost you 5 points in a womans mind is just fucking lol, and that's the impression you'll get if you use photofeeler.

why are you converting percentages to a numerical rating?? Photofeeler tells you nothing about your rating out of 10, just how well you do relative to other men on the website.

 

[Twisted]

This is bullshit, I got 71% on my one for attractiveness with the range set to females 29 and under.

Gambler mogs the shit out of me so therefore it’s not really reliable

 

[itsOVER]

Agreed. I'm 95% sure incelman (with his OP photo) would easily beat my photofeeler photo on tinder...because on tinder people aren't so much judging the quality of the photo, they're judging attractiveness. That's why I say photofeeler isn't a great predictor of attractiveness.

I am pretty sure of that, too. While you're not ugly, you wouldn't do too well on Tinder in the west. You do well in Asia at least, so you get laid, which is all that matters. You just need to get your ass back to Asia asap and stop wasting time in the west after your degree is done with.
Any high trust 4+ white guy in Asia will do well with women. The taller, the better of course.

I am ugly fam, and yeah I do shit on tinder in the west (literally not a single match EVER that wasn't a bot, although I've long since given up on that).

I get enough matches in Asia to get laid (although there's other, better dating sites than tinder tbh, depending on the country you're in, so it's only part of my overall get-laid strategy there), but of course as I said in the other thread, Chad always wins and will always mog incels and normies in terms of matches anywhere on the planet.

 

[kvn]

whats your bf%, height and weight?

 

[Deleted member 306]

whats your bf%, height and weight?

height= 5'11

weight= 77kg

 

[jamho22]

This is bullshit, I got 71% on my one for attractiveness with the range set to females 29 and under.

Gambler mogs the shit out of me so therefore it’s not really reliable

He doesn't. You are better looking and you will do much better on tinder. And your seriously going to trust the guys on here over actual female voters?

 

[Harvey_Weinstein_Hero]

Gambler

 

[ghostcell]

ur not a truecell but its definitely over

but u would slay in asia probably though
i dont think latin america cause u look like u could be from there so they wont notice u too much

 

[Kointo]

ur not a truecel but its definitely over

but u would slay in asia probably though
i dont think latin america cause u look like u could be from there so they wont notice u too much

Truecel, not truecell

 

[Deleted member 306]

ur not a truecell but its definitely over

but u would slay in asia probably though
i dont think latin america cause u look like u could be from there so they wont notice u too much

It's all cope if you can't slay women from your country

 

[theultimate341]

It's all cope if you can't slay women from your country

True, but you can still probably slay in another country.

 

[Deleted member 306]

True, but you can still probably slay in another country.

It doesn't matter. You can't be happy with foreign women.

 

[Allblueeeee]

Photofeeler is just a big scam. I am an average curry/autistcel and got 94%

 

[Allblueeeee]

Not that it means much tbh since being a 22 year old virgin is solid proof anyway but a document isn't bad to have. I never had a chance. It was over before it even began. Time to ROT.

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Photofeeler is just a big scam. I am an average curry/autistcel and got stupid ratings. This site is just COPE[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]

[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]

[/font]