Not that it means much tbh since being a 22 year old virgin is solid proof anyway but a document isn't bad to have. I never had a chance. It was over before it even began. Time to ROT.
- Status
Not that it means much tbh since being a 22 year old virgin is solid proof anyway but a document isn't bad to have. I never had a chance. It was over before it even began. Time to ROT.
My condolences boyo.
itsOVER said:
Some men have lost it when it comes to women
This is a fucking brutal blackpill if they actually find you to be that ugly.
Where can I get my official document of subhumanity?
Are you a jew?
ordinaryotaku said:
It's not that brutal. Real life is much worse
If you're considered ugly than im not even human.
Tbh though photofeeler is a bunch of shit anyway and seems to be mostly based on the quality of the photo rather than any objective measures of attractiveness.
For instance, here's one of my photos. I'm obviously not as good looking as Gambler but here they rated me above him:
[attachment=1079]
Decent lighting + blurred/sharp contrast with the background + smiling + wearing decent clothes seem to be what gets you a lot of points on photofeeler. Proof of this? In random selfies I just take in my room I'm lucky to get a 10% attractiveness rating. They seem to rate the photo rather than the person in it.
For instance, here's one of my photos. I'm obviously not as good looking as Gambler but here they rated me above him:
[attachment=1079]
Decent lighting + blurred/sharp contrast with the background + smiling + wearing decent clothes seem to be what gets you a lot of points on photofeeler. Proof of this? In random selfies I just take in my room I'm lucky to get a 10% attractiveness rating. They seem to rate the photo rather than the person in it.
Attachments
itsOVER said:
What did some of the notes say?
C
Only 10 votes, lol. You need more than that.
Zielony4 said:
Great photo!
Great smile!
Great smile!
Great photo!
Smile seems a bit forced/frozen to me. Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
Great photo!
Great photo!
Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
Photo seems a bit bland to me.
Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
43% approval rating is not bad. 4/10 women on the street would fuck you. 2 sides of the street boyo.
I posted my pic on beautifulpeople.com a few years ago. Fucking ruthless site, as bad as tinder. I got a 33% before rejection. 1/3 in the most brutal anonymous standards.
I posted my pic on beautifulpeople.com a few years ago. Fucking ruthless site, as bad as tinder. I got a 33% before rejection. 1/3 in the most brutal anonymous standards.
Trustworthy- 6%
Why? Looks.
It doesn't make any logical sense to label someone us untrustworthy from looks.
Why? Looks.
It doesn't make any logical sense to label someone us untrustworthy from looks.
C
Kointo said:
He looks untrustworthy because of his eyes and long midface.
He isn't ugly, though, solid 6/10.
CopingGymcel said:
lol no. It's not a numbers game. WOmen share a HIVEMIND
C
incelman said:
Are all of the voters female?
Kointo said:
Long midface=low trust
CopingGymcel said:
That's what I was saying.
CopingGymcel said:
Yes. Every single one of them
C
incelman said:
x-x Condolences.
I guess we don't know what women want as men when it comes to men who aren't 8+.
Try it with this picture instead.
CopingGymcel said:
Yes. That's why ratings are cope. That's why I say, that if you are a 22 year old virgin it's over boyo.
CopingGymcel said:
You can set it to only have female voters of a certain age and under.
But like I say, it's mostly bullshit. I literally jump 40% when 'photomaxing' with lighting, blur/sharp contrast (not even morphing my own face, just blurring the background of the photo) and smiling. For some reason bedroom selfies get panned hard on photofeeler even if you're actually attractive.
I'm not saying it's totally worthless - I mean, it kinda shows that you probably shouldn't have every one of your tinder pics as a bedroom selfie. But it's not your /10 rating IMO, because you can literally jump 4 points by photomaxing. I'm neither a 5/10 nor a 1/10, but I've been given as low as 2% attractiveness rating on photofeeler before with a low effort selfie.
C
itsOVER said:
"Great photo!" - when you know it's over.
@incelman
T
I'd kill for 43%. Put more effort in your photos, stop looking like a shyguy cuck, and I'm sure you can pass the 50% threshold.
As for intelligence and trustworthiness, Id say they're right on the money.
As for intelligence and trustworthiness, Id say they're right on the money.
shukin said:
@incelman
The fuck?
TheIncelPill said:
intelligence and trustworthness are looks. If you are gl you are smart automatically
itsOVER said:
Ohh ok. Most of my comments when I posted like 7 months ago said "great smile" and ones where I didn't said "I think they seem uncomfortable in this photo" or "would prefer a different facial expression" None of the three categories were above 30%.
Dude on online dating sites even a fat roastie single mom with 5 bastard kids will settle for nothing less than chad.
Dont let this get you down. A 43% rating on a ruthless lookism site is good. Try RL.
Dont let this get you down. A 43% rating on a ruthless lookism site is good. Try RL.
Photofeeler isn’t legit.
shukin said:
@incelman
You set it to everyone, in the OP he had it set to females only. Basically a bunch of fags rating him high in your post.
Bro im average autistcel and got this. Photofeeler is a scam
Zielony4 said:
They're not comments that are written out, just an option the femoid chose to click on to go with their rating. Wouldn't pay much attention to them. But I wouldn't pay much attention to photofeeler anyway since like I say your 'rating' will vary wildly from one photo to another.
CopingGymcel said:
I lost all faith in photofeeler when I took a photo inside my room just in a t-shirt and jeans and got 2% attractiveness, then went outside and took the above photo and got 53%. Literally nothing changed, so it's like around 50% of your 'rating' comes from the quality of the photo. Just absolutely worthless tbh.
Why are the people posting their pictures not subhuman?
J
itsOVER said:
it isn't shit.. Its great for assessing success in dating apps and ratings are weighted. One can also make the argument that using a combination of pics and averaging out the attractiveness rating can give you an objective measure of ones attractiveness but i agree with you that one picture alone does not determine attractiveness.
Kointo said:Try it with this picture instead.
you really think this is going to get a girls motor running?
Kointo said:
Same question I ask myself.
itsOVER said:
You're fine bro, you just need to L I F T. And I'm not saying that sarcastically.
Gym and hair transplants and you're a normie.
AscendedNormie said:
Stop the fucking cope. This fucking cope that tinder/online ratings are a lion's den has to stop. RL is a million times worse.
jamho22 said:
Well, I don't think it's useful for telling you how attractive you are - since their rating can vary by up to 50% just depending on the photo with the same person in it.
If you take all your pictures outside, wearing nice clothes, smiling, using the blur/sharp background filter, taken at 5pm at night so you get the sunset halo, then running your pics through a couple of decent instagram filters...most people will do alright on photofeeler.
The same guy who takes a bunch of selfies in his room will get absolutely ripped to bits. Photofeeler users don't judge the person as much as they should IMO, they look at the photo quality more. How else do you explain that I can get a disparity of 50% attractiveness in my ratings? I'm neither a 5.3/10 nor a 0.2/10, but those are two ratings photofeeler gave me just based on photo quality and expression.
jamho22 said:
He gets my motor running (no homo)
KyloRen said:
With ALL my surgery (not just the HT, but jaw/chin/eye surgery) I'd probably make it to 5/10. I've always said you can looksmax your way up 1 PSL point, but no more unless you have an obvious deformity. 5/10, alas, just aint enough in the west (especially not when you're fucking 5ft 7). However, I'll rope before I do the gymcel cope.
Point of this thread though is photofeeler is bullshit. Their ratings vary too much from photo to photo.
C
Is photofeeder free? May try it, but afraid to destroy my confidence.
jamho22 said:
I'd imagine he'll do better with that photo than the one in his OP.
If he went outside and did the lighting, blur/sharp thing (basically photomaxxing but not morphing face or body) I'd say he'd get around 75-85% attractiveness.
CopingGymcel said:
If you have confidence your are not blackpilled
J
itsOVER said:
if you are going to take a shitty picture with poor lighting and one that doesn't accentuate your features, then you will look unattractive. Pic with Proper lighting captures your true features and would be a better indicator of attractiveness as its a closer approximation to how you might look IRL. Wearing unflattering clothes will make you look unattractive to females. Rules of attraction for women are very different than they are for men. For women, its not solely your looks which make you attractive, but a combination of looks status and confidence. Dressing nicely is a way of signaling status and even confidence. This is why you were able to barely edge out incelman in attractiveness rating.
CopingGymcel said:
Yes it's free but you have to wait a long time to get results (basically you build up 'karma' by voting on other peoples photos, and in turn you spend karma when they vote on yours. You'll only get 1 or 2 extra votes a day normally, so if you want a 'precise' rating (i.e. 40+ votes) expect to be waiting a while.
Think it's all cope though personally. Photomaxing gets you more on there than your looks ever will.
fakecels.me lad.....Kointo said:
itsOVER said:
With your looks, don't even think about roping.
C
itsOVER said:
The most accurate results is probably trying your photos on Tinder. That's probably all that matters, if girls want to fuck you or not, not that they "like your photo."
I'm going to try Tinder in Asia soon with Plus. I think I'll do quit well, but you'll never know. If I get more than 100 matches in day, I'll visit this summer.
- Status
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
