Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

i dont think abortion is immoral

AutismHaver

AutismHaver

Officer
★★★
Joined
Oct 28, 2025
Posts
764
Online time
23h 49m
i mean dont get me wrong child murder is, but if a liberal gets it before the physical symptoms show up it proves they didnt intend to have one in the first place, since if they did they wouldnt be ABLE to abort it without murdering the baby, whereas with christians the prospect of having sex at all is an attempt at childbirth given higher fertility rates (the fetus grows a lot quicker)
 
Last edited:
I think abortion can be utilised in a way to prevent society from becoming dysgenic. Not everyone should be able to breed and create offspring.
 
You can view abortion as a way to avoid children being born in inapt living conditions with stupid parents.

You can view abortion as a way to let girls having as much sex as they want without suffering much consequences.
 
It is mental gymnastic by normoids to allow them to murder their own children without feeling guilty about it. How do you not feel bad about murder? You claim that the subject is not human. Yes it would suck for the child to grow up unwanted, but it still beats death, like come on
 
It is mental gymnastic by normoids to allow them to murder their own children without feeling guilty about it. How do you not feel bad about murder? You claim that the subject is not human. Yes it would suck for the child to grow up unwanted, but it still beats death, like come on
the child isnt unwanted if the parents dont get an autopsy before the womb expands, cuz trying to abort it at that point would kill the mother, implying the baby is ALIVE; im not literally saying parents can abort their kids if they dont want them, im saying abortion is a circumstance of pre conception to begin with
 
i mean dont get me wrong child murder is, but if a liberal gets it before the physical symptoms show up it proves they didnt intend to have one in the first place, since if they did they wouldnt be ABLE to abort it without murdering the baby, whereas with christians the prospect of having sex at all is an attempt at childbirth given higher fertility rates (the fetus grows a lot quicker)
If you think murder is wrong, it only makes sense to be against it.

Sex only exists for reproduction, it was the roastie's choice to get pregnant. Having sex and not "intending to have a child" is a wildly absurd statement.
 
Having sex and not "intending to have a child" is a wildly absurd statement.
liberals have lower fertility rates, which is why they only have one or 2 kids compared to 5 on average for traditionalists, so yes they have sexual lenience
 
I think abortion can be utilised in a way to prevent society from becoming dysgenic. Not everyone should be able to breed and create offspring.
And who decides to murder other people's fetuses?? There are better ways to prevent society from becoming "dysgenic". Do you really want to set up some kind of stupid dystopia where people are examined and have their children exterminated. I'm sure the Klaus Schwabs and Bill Gateses of the world will like your idea. They will probably make it so that unless you give them your id and take 50 vaccines, you will not get a "breeding license".
 
liberals have lower fertility rates, which is why they only have one or 2 kids compared to 5 on average for traditionalists, so yes they have sexual lenience
When they have sex and a child comes out of it, it's still their responsibility, consequences (or risk) of their own actions. They shouldn't just get to kill a baby because they feel like it.
 
When they have sex and a child comes out of it, it's still their responsibility, consequences (or risk) of their own actions. They shouldn't just get to kill a baby because they feel like it.
well what does that even mean? the fetus is alive when the parents are alerted by it, but if they got an autopsy, like i said, they would have to do it on their own volition, so how could the child be alive in this stage?
 
I actually agree to adagree. If a child has a disability so bad then why do yhat shit.
 
well what does that even mean? the fetus is alive when the parents are alerted by it, but if they got an autopsy, like i said, they would have to do it on their own volition, so how could the child be alive in this stage?
The thing is alive regardless of the political ideology of it's creators.
 
Abortion is simply women throwing a tantrum, after they partake in an activity they know has one and one use only and are shocked when they deal with its results. If you function purely hedonistically and dont value human life then sure i guess i cant really convince you otherwise it's a morally repulsive act no different then a child sacrifice being done by azetic pagans
 
And who decides to murder other people's fetuses?? There are better ways to prevent society from becoming "dysgenic". Do you really want to set up some kind of stupid dystopia where people are examined and have their children exterminated. I'm sure the Klaus Schwabs and Bill Gateses of the world will like your idea. They will probably make it so that unless you give them your id and take 50 vaccines, you will not get a "breeding license".
Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates are both dysgenic themselves and in a world that followed my principles, they would've never been born.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →