if an incel said some deranged shit ironically it would get screenshotted faster than the speed of fucking light but this femcel is promote killing kids and no one gives a singular fuck,

i like how people cry about incel forums being a thing but femcel forums is okay buddy boyos
the entire imageboard is just full of psychoshit
this foid literally wants old people dead
Also, one thing to notice about ALL foid complaints IRL and online: Its always about how something is not letting them do what they want. They have child level morality. OH I CANT DO WHAT I WANT THEREFORE YOU ARE EVIL.
When they complain about men, its 100% that men are not doing what they want.
When you read their posts superficially, it seems paradoxical. They make similar complaints to incels, about being mistreated, disrespected for their gender etc... but when you read closely, everything they say breaks down to "WA WA WA ME ME ME"
For example, one of them posted this:
It contains schizo level delusion paragraphs such as this one:
"Mothers are the least respected people on the planet."
Bro for 1000s of years spousal and child support has existed. In the oldest written law codes we have, it literally says that there has to be provision for mothers.
The
Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC) declares that a man must provide sustenance to a woman who has borne him children so that she can raise them:
137. If a man wish to separate from a woman who has borne him children, or from his wife who has borne him children: then he shall give that wife her dowry, and a part of the usufruct of field, garden, and property, so that she can rear her children. When she has brought up her children, a portion of all that is given to the children, equal as that of one son, shall be given to her. She may then marry the man of her heart.
[3]
The above law only applies to women who had children with her husband. This fits more closely with the definition of
child support in some jurisdictions.
en.wikipedia.org
So what these foids are complaining about is objectively not true. So why are they actually mad? Because they want have their cake and eat it too. They want to walk the earth doing as they please, with zero consequences. They basically want to be treated as demigods.
Another thing they do is project super hard or when they talk about "men" that abused or manipulated them, they talk about chads and violent fuckbois.
here is another good example to analyze:
Let's translate it:
1. She hates that men "frontload affection" - mean are open about their feelings and dont play mind games by pretending not to be interested. She doesn't want this. She wants the distant, mysterious bad boy whos unavailable.
2. She says shes reserved at first and slowly opens up - mind games. Shes giving mixed signals, letting dudes hang etc...
3. "And I start slowly to make sure they don't get uncomfortable or misread me."
Translation: I make sure they dance to my tune and understand exactly what demands I am making. She is vetting the best and most subservient buxxers from her pool of orbiters.
4. Her next claim: "Men lovebomb women and once they are in a relationship, they dont put effort in anymore."
a) this is what women do, they turn off the sex after a while and start making demands (projection by her)
b) men cant lovebomb because men dont have leverage or value. How can you give someone something if they dont want it?
c) "they dont put in any more effort" - they dont do what I want, I want them to keep dating me after we get together aka, serving me, providing, showering me in attention and gifts
Think about this from a male on male friendship perspective. Would you ever say this about a male friend? "Oh, you are not putting in enough effort!" - always gender swap and it becomes obvious. In a real relationship or friendship, you just hang out, chill and vibe. No effort, its smooth sailing. She doesn't want that.
5. Her final claims:
a) "i am careful about presents because i dont want them to feel like they owe me something"
Oh you mean you act like an ungrateful cunt on purpose? She is literally implying she is ungrateful for gifts on purpose.
b) Open contradiction time: "Men intentionally and openly try to manipulate women into sex."
Ok how exactly do you "openly manipulate" someone. How tf is is manipulation if someone is open? "hey girl, listen, im gonna do some jedi mind tricks to make you suck my cock." like what?
makes no sense.
What she is actually saying is that dudes she doesnt like are trying to get with her and she perceives that as manipulation. Why? Because thats how she would get sex -
@WorthlessSlavicShit posted that thread about how 49% of foids admit to using manipulation and coercion to get sex from guys, aka RAPE.
Jfl. Check this shit out brocels, because feminists and bluepillers sure as fuck won't. In this 2013 study, the researchers looked at the self-reported sexual offending and victimization of male and female students in 10 (well, 9 really, for some reason no women participated in the Austrian...
incels.is
So its projection.
If you read the thread, there are also foids complaining about men watching porn.
Again, this is an example of rules for thee but not for me.
We have known for years that a ton of women actually watch porn and that it is very nasty porn.
+ Erotic BDSM novels like 50 shades of grey have existed for over a century now.
So yes, women do consume porn on the same level as men, especially if we count these books.
If you look deeper, a sizable amount of these foids watch porn at least once a week.
So there goes the meme of the low female sex drive too.
Nearly a third of women surveyed reported
watching porn every week — and 10 percent watch it daily.
Women love porn. We need to accept it. We need to embrace it, because it's just a fact. Luckily, there does seem to be an increased awareness about women and porn in recent times. In fact, Marie Claire recently released a survey of over 3,000…
www.bustle.com
So every third woman you see outside watches porn every week, and every 10th daily.
HOWEVER - and here comes the "rules for thee but not for me" - women are also the biggest group advocating AGAINST Porn:
greenpill.net
They always want more restrictions on men and less for women. Remember the sex-doll brothes that got shut down?
Italy's first sex doll brothel, LumiDolls Torino in Turin was raided by police just nine days after opening on September 3. It was found to be breaking laws on renting out accommodation.
www.dailymail.co.uk
This happened all over the place, worldwide. A few clever businessmen realized the potential of sex dolls.
Think about it, it's a win-win for both genders.
Women don't get exploited for sex work, men get to have sex... perfect deal right?
Nope. It had to be shut down because it benefits men.
I reccomend this video for another example of this historic trend:
View: https://youtu.be/DdqkuLiaR7c
The speaker explains the true reason why women did not get the vote: Because men would have been entitelt to it too.
Remember, at the time most men could not vote either. So giving women universal suffrage would have implied giving it to men as well at the same time. And this is what seems to have been the actual obstacle. There were plenty of simps in the government that wanted to give women the vote, but not men.
This also perfectly reflects what I laid out in my "masculinity is a social construct" thread - Society is basically just men bashing men and women profiting. That's what all of this breaks down to, male vs male aggression and women reaping the rewards as bystanders.
Anyway, I hope I could give an insight into how these women think and how laughable and transparent their claims become when contrasted with actual data. They really just fucking hate men in general and have a giga high-ingoup preference for another.