Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I am not heterosexual

YuiStillMyCope

YuiStillMyCope

Self-banned
-
Joined
Feb 2, 2023
Posts
16,661
Heterosexuality was originally defined as “abnormal or perverted appetite toward the opposite sex”. It’s the counterpart to homosexuality, which as we all know is an abnormal or perverted appetite toward the opposite sex and a mental illness.

When gay rights activists redefined homosexuality from a mental illness to just a “normal” sexual attraction, they alsi redefined heterosexuality to just being attracted to the opposite gender (which is just called being normal). I refuse to go along with this. I am not heterosexual. I’m just normal
 
DBXaU4dUAAEnNqE
 
Made the mistake of reading some of it. BBC being woke retards as usual. Heterosexuality has always existed as it is rn but back then ppl were religious retards that thought u would to blind from masturbating
 
Next article: everyone is faggot tranny and heteros are unnatural and should be aushwitzed
 
straightest .is user in 2023
 
Next article: everyone is faggot tranny and heteros are unnatural and should be aushwitzed
they'll definitely do this at some point tbh.
 
@iamsubhuman you can add this to your “gay chad” copypasta
 
Did not read one letter.
 
actually, high iq post.

I think this goes in line with what foucault says in his history of sexuality. he argues that nothing about our sexuality is "natural" but rather shaped by social forces known as power structures. he talks about power not in the colloquial sense of a hierarchical system of power in the hands of a few or institutions, but sort of a radical decentralized system of power that exists throughout relationships and social networks and can manifest in several forms. For example, defining sexual categories like "heterosexual" and "homosexual" reinforces power dynamics by controlling and regulating sexuality through defining and pathologizing certain behaviors and desires.
 
really? I just intended it as a troll post lol
Yeah. It reminds me of Foucault’s history of sexuality. But Foucault was actually a faggot so maybe it’s good to be skeptical of his beliefs
 
ok
and?
we all know that you're gay already
 
I think this goes in line with what foucault says in his history of sexuality. he argues that nothing about our sexuality is "natural" but rather shaped by social forces known as power structures.
I think that attraction to big tits is natural.
 
I think that attraction to big tits is natural.
I actually don't think it's natural. There's little evolutionary benefit to having big tits. They aren't a reliable indicator of fertility. The attraction to big tits is mostly socialized.
 
I actually don't think it's natural. There's little evolutionary benefit to having big tits. They aren't a reliable indicator of fertility. The attraction to big tits is mostly socialized.
Ofc it's an indicator of fertility and ur just a closet homo
 
Interesting hill to fight on :feelskek:
 
I actually don't think it's natural. There's little evolutionary benefit to having big tits. They aren't a reliable indicator of fertility. The attraction to big tits is mostly socialized.
I always have impression that young females with big natural tits are more fertile and produce more milk.
 
Clickbait. Heterosexuality didnt exist as a concept because it was so natural no one thought aboutiti
 
Guys this was just clickbait, i do consider myself heterosexual
 

Similar threads

4sez
Replies
2
Views
410
Horatio Alger
Horatio Alger
HotDogCel
Replies
2
Views
464
Brainy
Brainy
Shaktiman
Replies
10
Views
606
SickWeakCoward
SickWeakCoward

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top