Sheogorath
Paragon
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 20, 2018
- Posts
- 19,759
Younglings GTFO (see the NSFW tag) the pics to follow will ruin you, you're not prepared, go watch some moe anime like I used to. Sperg time.
I was attempting to solve the mystery of "why is the average penis longer than the average vagina" supplemented "and why is even the longer-than-vagina average dick not enough to satisfy the average foid".
Unaroused vaginas are tunnels with only 3.5 inches empty. They're actually longer but some of the upper space is occupied by the womb (a big sack) and the cervix (a tunnel conntacted to that sack).
Arousal causes muscles above the womb to tighten and lift the womb, pulling the cervix (microtunnel) along with it.
Space it previously occupied in the vagina is evacuated, adding a couple inches so it's something like 4,5.
Foids have mentioned their cervix is a sensitive area, and I believe them. I imagine ramming something hard into it at an appreciable speed hurts, like us getting kicked in the balls for example. Probably not THAT bad though. I'm not sure what would be the best comparison
Feel free to chime in with a metaphor we can understand IT girls, like through a mutually shared bodypart. Is a poke to the cervix like getting poked in the eye at the same velocity? Poked in the nipple? Poked in the eardrum?
- - -
Anyway the key here is velocity. Let's do an experiment guys: rap the tip of your finger sharply against your lower lip so you rapidly compress it against your tooth.
Uncomfortable, right?
Now instead, just try gradually applying pressure to that lip instead. Not so bad is it? Maybe even a little tingly.
That's my theory on how big dicks could be exert enjoyable cervix pressures: not with a high-speed impact but with a gradual application of pressure.
IE these are isometric squat holds not box jumps.
- - -
You need to remember that the cervix isn't a wall. When I was a young teen lad who didn't know any better and all I knew the cervix was the 'end' of the vagina I just pictured it as a wall, because back then you're an idiot and don't think about "how does the baby enter the vagina".
You have to keep in mind that just like the labia entrance of the vagina that the cervix entrance of the womb is built to expand large enough to pass a baby through. It's not some pathetic tunnel with a low fixed diameter like a urethra or an ear canal or a nostril.
So in theory it should be expandable over time and enterable, thus the variations "cervix penetration" fetishes in various manga: japs are onto the truth! That's one way how we explain why women want dicks longer than their vaginas balls-deep into those vaginas.
- - -
But let's say I'm wrong for a second: maybe cervical penetration is rare. Maybe it just doesn't tend to happen in any gradual pleasant way outside of childbirth where you have a special hormone cocktail of elastin to help things along.
There's still an alternate explanation, and rather than "cervical expansion" (the tunnel widens) it has to do with the "cervical elevation" I mentioned at the start of the article.
The muscles which lift the womb (like any muscles) have a minimum length they can shorten to. They can't lift the womb beyond that. Muscles reach this thing called "over-active insufficiency" which reduces their powers as there's too much overlap in the fibrils. It's why you can't contract something like the transversus abdominis tightly enough to cut your spine in half: it's not any pain that stops you, it's just it can't overlap anymore.
But there being a maximum height MUSCLE can lift the womb to doesn't necessarily mean the womb can't move any higher.
In theory if you were pressing up on the womb from below, that should either do one of two things:
My theory, if the penis does not penetrate the cervix of the inferior (bottom) wall of the womb, it instead lifts that flesh it is pressed against.
I would hedge my bets on the "deformation" (lifting wall not entire thing) approach.
This is where uterine prolapses and the awful pics come in guys.
Obviously as the uterus descends, the cervix descends with it, and the vagina becomes negligible.
If you check the article on Wikipedia there's this harrowing image of the cervix actually visible poking out past the labia.
So what I would argue here is: if the tissues holding the womb in place can fail to such an epic degree to allow it to travel in such a downward direction, why could they not also fail in the opposite direction where a dick bench-presses that womb further up into the intestines?
- - -
That's of course if you properly align the curve of your dick to actually apply force parallel to the womb alignment.
You can see in the illustration of a health (ascended) womb that there's almost something like a 90-degree curve of the vagina relative to the cervix tunnel.
This isn't rigid set in stone or anything (tissues deform to accomodate) but it still has some influence.
So a 3rd explanation would be that the cervix isn't the end of the vagina you hit with your dick at all, because if you angle it to curve away from the cervix entrance then instead you'd be putting pressure on the vaginal wall adjacent to the cervix, which could be less sensitive and more expansible.
I was attempting to solve the mystery of "why is the average penis longer than the average vagina" supplemented "and why is even the longer-than-vagina average dick not enough to satisfy the average foid".
Unaroused vaginas are tunnels with only 3.5 inches empty. They're actually longer but some of the upper space is occupied by the womb (a big sack) and the cervix (a tunnel conntacted to that sack).
Arousal causes muscles above the womb to tighten and lift the womb, pulling the cervix (microtunnel) along with it.
Space it previously occupied in the vagina is evacuated, adding a couple inches so it's something like 4,5.
Foids have mentioned their cervix is a sensitive area, and I believe them. I imagine ramming something hard into it at an appreciable speed hurts, like us getting kicked in the balls for example. Probably not THAT bad though. I'm not sure what would be the best comparison
Feel free to chime in with a metaphor we can understand IT girls, like through a mutually shared bodypart. Is a poke to the cervix like getting poked in the eye at the same velocity? Poked in the nipple? Poked in the eardrum?
- - -
Anyway the key here is velocity. Let's do an experiment guys: rap the tip of your finger sharply against your lower lip so you rapidly compress it against your tooth.
Uncomfortable, right?
Now instead, just try gradually applying pressure to that lip instead. Not so bad is it? Maybe even a little tingly.
That's my theory on how big dicks could be exert enjoyable cervix pressures: not with a high-speed impact but with a gradual application of pressure.
IE these are isometric squat holds not box jumps.
- - -
You need to remember that the cervix isn't a wall. When I was a young teen lad who didn't know any better and all I knew the cervix was the 'end' of the vagina I just pictured it as a wall, because back then you're an idiot and don't think about "how does the baby enter the vagina".
You have to keep in mind that just like the labia entrance of the vagina that the cervix entrance of the womb is built to expand large enough to pass a baby through. It's not some pathetic tunnel with a low fixed diameter like a urethra or an ear canal or a nostril.
So in theory it should be expandable over time and enterable, thus the variations "cervix penetration" fetishes in various manga: japs are onto the truth! That's one way how we explain why women want dicks longer than their vaginas balls-deep into those vaginas.
- - -
But let's say I'm wrong for a second: maybe cervical penetration is rare. Maybe it just doesn't tend to happen in any gradual pleasant way outside of childbirth where you have a special hormone cocktail of elastin to help things along.
There's still an alternate explanation, and rather than "cervical expansion" (the tunnel widens) it has to do with the "cervical elevation" I mentioned at the start of the article.
The muscles which lift the womb (like any muscles) have a minimum length they can shorten to. They can't lift the womb beyond that. Muscles reach this thing called "over-active insufficiency" which reduces their powers as there's too much overlap in the fibrils. It's why you can't contract something like the transversus abdominis tightly enough to cut your spine in half: it's not any pain that stops you, it's just it can't overlap anymore.
But there being a maximum height MUSCLE can lift the womb to doesn't necessarily mean the womb can't move any higher.
In theory if you were pressing up on the womb from below, that should either do one of two things:
1) lift the entire sack
2) deform the sack, indenting/lifting just the lower wall while the upper wall remains immobile
My theory, if the penis does not penetrate the cervix of the inferior (bottom) wall of the womb, it instead lifts that flesh it is pressed against.
I would hedge my bets on the "deformation" (lifting wall not entire thing) approach.
This is where uterine prolapses and the awful pics come in guys.
Obviously as the uterus descends, the cervix descends with it, and the vagina becomes negligible.
If you check the article on Wikipedia there's this harrowing image of the cervix actually visible poking out past the labia.
So what I would argue here is: if the tissues holding the womb in place can fail to such an epic degree to allow it to travel in such a downward direction, why could they not also fail in the opposite direction where a dick bench-presses that womb further up into the intestines?
- - -
That's of course if you properly align the curve of your dick to actually apply force parallel to the womb alignment.
You can see in the illustration of a health (ascended) womb that there's almost something like a 90-degree curve of the vagina relative to the cervix tunnel.
This isn't rigid set in stone or anything (tissues deform to accomodate) but it still has some influence.
So a 3rd explanation would be that the cervix isn't the end of the vagina you hit with your dick at all, because if you angle it to curve away from the cervix entrance then instead you'd be putting pressure on the vaginal wall adjacent to the cervix, which could be less sensitive and more expansible.