![Divergent_Integral](/data/avatars/m/27/27332.jpg?1633865439)
Divergent_Integral
Spastic ricecel, heightmogged by 99.74% of men
★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2020
- Posts
- 851
This regularly comes up in discussions with friends and acquaintances. They often seem to know (or pretend to know, but let's assume good faith) some ugly loser with a reasonably attractive and loving GF.
I usually counter-argue against this argument using probability: yeah, sure it's bound to happen occasionally that a disgusting pig finds an acorn. But so is winning the lottery, or getting hit by lightning. You can hope to win the lottery, but to my mind it isn't a very rational kind of hope. Nothing to build your financial planning on anyway. Also, there is the Bayesian point of view: the more failed (romantic) outcomes one observes in one's own life, the lower should we estimate the probability of a favorable romantic outcome next time.
Any other counter-arguments that you can come up with?
I usually counter-argue against this argument using probability: yeah, sure it's bound to happen occasionally that a disgusting pig finds an acorn. But so is winning the lottery, or getting hit by lightning. You can hope to win the lottery, but to my mind it isn't a very rational kind of hope. Nothing to build your financial planning on anyway. Also, there is the Bayesian point of view: the more failed (romantic) outcomes one observes in one's own life, the lower should we estimate the probability of a favorable romantic outcome next time.
Any other counter-arguments that you can come up with?