barcacel
Vitantiheterodroidsexual Monk-mode MGTOW
-
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2022
- Posts
- 1,906
humans with dark skin, dark eyes and dark hair arrived in europe 50,000-42,000 years ago, there was an ice at this time, the women started dying a lot because of the ice age and all men mated with the only females that survived, which were the most neotenous because those were adapted for the cold, or for some reason those men only mated with the same females, leaving many femcels and those females were the most neotenous of their generation, look at 50,000 years ago:
black men usually have darker skin than black females:
whites were created on the steppe-tundra of eastern Europe and western Siberia between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago, at this point they were a minority, then 11,500 years ago the last ice age ended, after that we got an extinction event in the earth 10,000 years ago that was an immense solar storm, this solar storm killed most males in america, europa, asia and to a lesser extent africa, look at all the continents 10,000 years ago:
but for some reason in europe more white men than black men survived (i don't know if the same happened in east asia), the few men left in all the continents started to practice polygyny, this polygyny continued in asia and europe (in europe to a lesser extent), because those white and east asian men managed to create technologies and increase their wealth, leaving thousands of black men unable to reproduce, in africa and america it stopped. Look at 10,000 years ago:
there is also more evidence of this polygyny because white men have lighter skin, eyes and hair than white women:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485197
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160721072753.htm
https://books.google.com/books?id=Dj0XAQAAMAAJ&dq="Blonder+than+women"&pg=PA186
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color#cite_note-88
extra:
bluepilled blog on this:
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2022/10/european-hair-eye-and-skin-color.html
@PLA1092 @Balding Subhuman @Neurotic @suigintwo @Made in Heaven @huaus @Misogynist Curry 卐 @CrippledByLonelines @Pajeetsingh
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history, take a look at 50,000 years ago:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/bad-...9200-year-ago-discovered-in-ancient-ice-cores
https://www.newsweek.com/extreme-solar-storm-hit-earth-during-sun-quiet-period-10000-years-ago-1674575#:~:text=An extreme solar storm struck,11-year-long cycles.
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
https://www.newsweek.com/extreme-solar-storm-hit-earth-during-sun-quiet-period-10000-years-ago-1674575#:~:text=An extreme solar storm struck,11-year-long cycles.
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history, look at 10,000 years ago:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
"All this began to change about 10,000 years ago when those humans who began to adopt agriculture became more numerous and more powerful than their wandering relatives. This transition from mobile hunting and gathering to sedentary agriculture was the most violent in human history. The fossil record shows that, as a percentage of total population, more men died from war in these years than in any other time in human history, including World War I and World War II.
Those conquered but not killed in these battles usually became slaves, and those slaves were not equally distributed among the victors. Only the richest and most powerful families could afford to buy and keep slaves, so as the size and complexity of these societies grew from city-states into empires, a familiar pattern took shape. Anthropologist Dr. Laura Betzig explained that in any large ancient empire “powerful men mate with hundreds of women, pass their power on to a son by a legitimate wife, and take the lives of men who get in their way.”
And so polygamy became the dominant human mating pattern for thousands of years. This only began to change with the advent of Christianity — as monogamous as the Romans and Greeks were among citizens, sex with slaves was accepted and even encouraged. But it's not as if Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount and then every European became monogamous the next day. It took time, centuries even, for the Church to impose or, really, reimpose, monogamy on the West, but it did eventually become the norm."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/when-did-monogamy-become-the-norm
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
"All this began to change about 10,000 years ago when those humans who began to adopt agriculture became more numerous and more powerful than their wandering relatives. This transition from mobile hunting and gathering to sedentary agriculture was the most violent in human history. The fossil record shows that, as a percentage of total population, more men died from war in these years than in any other time in human history, including World War I and World War II.
Those conquered but not killed in these battles usually became slaves, and those slaves were not equally distributed among the victors. Only the richest and most powerful families could afford to buy and keep slaves, so as the size and complexity of these societies grew from city-states into empires, a familiar pattern took shape. Anthropologist Dr. Laura Betzig explained that in any large ancient empire “powerful men mate with hundreds of women, pass their power on to a son by a legitimate wife, and take the lives of men who get in their way.”
And so polygamy became the dominant human mating pattern for thousands of years. This only began to change with the advent of Christianity — as monogamous as the Romans and Greeks were among citizens, sex with slaves was accepted and even encouraged. But it's not as if Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount and then every European became monogamous the next day. It took time, centuries even, for the Church to impose or, really, reimpose, monogamy on the West, but it did eventually become the norm."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/when-did-monogamy-become-the-norm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485197
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160721072753.htm
https://books.google.com/books?id=Dj0XAQAAMAAJ&dq="Blonder+than+women"&pg=PA186
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color#cite_note-88
this was bound to happen because the earth has been becoming colder over millions of years and that has increased brain size:
global warming will be reversed:
something similar happened with white men and indian men:
children take 60 percent of their DNA from their father:
global warming will be reversed:
the ozone layer is being regenerated thanks to technology, it is expected to recover to 1980 levels by 2040, blacks might be going extinct
the earth has been becoming more cold and having less sunlight in the last thousands of years: "We know for sure that the earth became cooler: the evidence can be found through a variety of techniques for assessing historical temperatures, such as the study of ice cores and tree rings. There are...
incels.is
Extremely autistic racial history post. Curries enter and see how we were made. VERY LONG POST.
So the modern day curry's ancestry derives from 3 ancestral groups. First and foremost, the earliest migrants to the subcontinent, who would become the south asian hunter gatherers, they were one of the earliest migrants out of Africa over 60,000 years ago. The veddid. Though when they had...
looksmax.org
"From the thousands of mouse genes that were analyzed, the researchers concluded that paternal genes play a much larger role than maternal genes. The copy of the father’s genes were more active for nearly 60 percent of its baby’s genes."
https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2015/03/study-shows-paternal-genetics-dominate-42535
"Genes from your father are more dominant than those inherited from your mother, new research has shown.
All mammals are likely to use the majority of genetic material passed down from males, even if offspring look and act more like the mother, according to the study on lab mice by University of North Carolina’s School of Medicine.
This means that even though we inherit an equal amount of DNA from each parent, the paternal line is mostly found to govern how a person develops into an adult – especially in regards to their health."
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...than-your-mother-say-scientists-10084995.html
https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2015/03/study-shows-paternal-genetics-dominate-42535
"Genes from your father are more dominant than those inherited from your mother, new research has shown.
All mammals are likely to use the majority of genetic material passed down from males, even if offspring look and act more like the mother, according to the study on lab mice by University of North Carolina’s School of Medicine.
This means that even though we inherit an equal amount of DNA from each parent, the paternal line is mostly found to govern how a person develops into an adult – especially in regards to their health."
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...than-your-mother-say-scientists-10084995.html
bluepilled blog on this:
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2022/10/european-hair-eye-and-skin-color.html
@PLA1092 @Balding Subhuman @Neurotic @suigintwo @Made in Heaven @huaus @Misogynist Curry 卐 @CrippledByLonelines @Pajeetsingh
Last edited: