Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

How do you even develop a developing nation?

retributor

retributor

TDD TCD
-
Joined
Nov 20, 2025
Posts
3,682
The main causes as to why a developing nation remains developing are:

1. Corruption
2. Food security/environmental
3. Overpollution
4. Exploitation

There are no institutions in 3rd world nations, people are encouraged to be corrupt and scam as much as possible, take Brazil as an example, corruption is like the weed that grows with a crop, in the case of Brazil it grew into gangs and organizations which de-facto control parts of their country.

Food security and environmental factors, Sudan is a good case of this and most of the middle eastern countries are aswell, Sudan is an arid nation which relies heavily on imported food, thereby becoming reliant on others to survive, this combined with racial and religious problems turned it into a warzone. Everyone is encouraged to rape and pillage and fend for themselves, there are no institutions or safety nets that keep the Sudanese society united.

In the case of overpollution and exploitation you can look at Indonesia and Nigeria. All of these points are tied together. Companies from developed nations export their labour into poorer nations, because the labour value provided by a Nigerian is equal to that of someone in a developed nation, except the the people in poorer nations hold very little global economic value. Cities in China, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc experience heavy amount of smog from factories.

Not only do undeveloped nations have to deal with domestic problems, companies from developed nations want to also create an environment which would have your country rely on these companies.

The cycle of going from an impoverish nation to a developed one goes something like this from my observations:

1. Agricultural state (undeveloped)
2. Labour state (semi-developed)
3. Service exporting state (developed)

Though you have to keep in mind many of the countries today are artificially created and can barely reach the first state. Being a developed country means your primary exports are services to other countries. It would be imperative to your own growth to create an environment in which undeveloped countries would keep providing your country with cheap labour.
 
Last edited:
The easiest way for an undeveloped nation to become developed is by having a brutal dictatorship that stomps out corruption and exploits its own population, military deterrence (nukes are the easiest), and access to the global market to export goods. If each of these conditions aren't met, the institutions that form the base and safety net of a society will be put in place incredibly slowly.
 
Last edited:
nice post. I would add:

5. Religion

There is a correlation between high religiosity and lower economic development. We see this especially with Muslim countries. One of the reasons I believe China will overtake the US in terms of GDP within the next 25 years is because they are an Atheist country. Atheism allows for rational decision making.
 
Simple, kill all niggers and kikes and strip toilets from their rights.
 
Developing country is a meaningless term: how can Brazil and Indonesia with established industrial capital be in the same position as Sudan?
 
Developing country is a meaningless term: how can Brazil and Indonesia with established industrial capital be in the same position as Sudan?
Yep true
 
1773203141638
 
You gotta replace the niggers with some hyperboreans
 
Developing country is a meaningless term: how can Brazil and Indonesia with established industrial capital be in the same position as Sudan?
Sudan is a warzone it is the most extreme example therefore I used it

Labour capitals in the 3rd world are more developed

Sudan is an undeveloped agricultural state
 
ask for wypipo to move there
 
nice post. I would add:

5. Religion

There is a correlation between high religiosity and lower economic development. We see this especially with Muslim countries. One of the reasons I believe China will overtake the US in terms of GDP within the next 25 years is because they are an Atheist country. Atheism allows for rational decision making.
Religion can be a unifying force, in the case of Iran it has multiple ethnic groups, and Shia Islam keeps these united.

Religion helps people be united and cope with their circumstances.

I think societies with welfare have less need for religion, it becomes a social custom and a part of their culture
 
The main causes as to why a developing nation remains developing are:

1. Corruption
2. Food security/environmental
3. Overpollution
4. Exploitation

There are no institutions in 3rd world nations, people are encouraged to be corrupt and scam as much as possible, take Brazil as an example, corruption is like the weed that grows with a crop, in the case of Brazil it grew into gangs and organizations which de-facto control parts of their country.

Food security and environmental factors, Sudan is a good case of this and most of the middle eastern countries are aswell, Sudan is an arid nation which relies heavily on imported food, thereby becoming reliant on others to survive, this combined with racial and religious problems turned it into a warzone. Everyone is encouraged to rape and pillage and fend for themselves, there are no institutions or safety nets that keep the Sudanese society united.

In the case of overpollution and exploitation you can look at Indonesia and Nigeria. All of these points are tied together. Companies from developed nations export their labour into poorer nations, because the labour value provided by a Nigerian is equal to that of someone in a developed nation, except the the people in poorer nations hold very little global economic value. Cities in China, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc experience heavy amount of smog from factories.

Not only do undeveloped nations have to deal with domestic problems, companies from developed nations want to also create an environment which would have your country rely on these companies.

The cycle of going from an impoverish nation to a developed one goes something like this from my observations:

1. Agricultural state (undeveloped)
2. Labour state (semi-developed)
3. Service exporting state (developed)

Though you have to keep in mind many of the countries today are artificially created and can barely reach the first state. Being a developed country means your primary exports are services to other countries. It would be imperative to your own growth to create an environment in which undeveloped countries would keep providing your country with cheap labour.
You need to catch the historical moment, like China did. At the time, you need to side with the West, which will need you to contain the enemy (the USSR), and then, during the development of neoliberalism in the United States and the United Kingdom, offer yourself as a supplier of cheap labor. Over time, this will work. Back in the early 1980s, the Chinese were as poor as the Sub-Saharan Africans, living on about a dollar a day, but now they are a fairly developed and powerful nation. Although the Chinese had a huge historical lag behind the West, literally two or three centuries.
 
By educating the poor and uneducated people about contraceptives such as condom and family planning.

Equal distribution of wealth.

Forcing the rich , privileged and corrupt to distribute their wealth to the poor.

More jobs and careers so poor people can earn better.

Not letting any political party to have monopoly over politics. Do not vote the popular ones , it will let popular political parties to have total control over politics. Always make sure to change political parties/ leaders every 5 years.


Remove feminism. UN is the biggest feminist lobby.

An actual and effective Men's Rights Movement wil solve many problems such as mandatory conscription, homelessness , violence, false accusations, etc.
 
Last edited:
You need to catch the historical moment, like China did. At the time, you need to side with the West, which will need you to contain the enemy (the USSR), and then, during the development of neoliberalism in the United States and the United Kingdom, offer yourself as a supplier of cheap labor. Over time, this will work. Back in the early 1980s, the Chinese were as poor as the Sub-Saharan Africans, living on about a dollar a day, but now they are a fairly developed and powerful nation. Although the Chinese had a huge historical lag behind the West, literally two or three centuries.
submitting to the west is law for 3rd world nations
 
Genetics are dependent on environment and diet, and often in human history they are shaped by trade
Well they are somewhat connected and develop with them over many tens of thousands of years. But they are not dependent in the sense of nurture > nature. It's always the nature of people, their genes, that dictates their behavious and in the end their state building skills.
 
Easy when you create a society with a foundation of hard work and doing the right thing, it will automatically elevate itself.
 
Religion can be a unifying force, in the case of Iran it has multiple ethnic groups, and Shia Islam keeps these united.

Religion helps people be united and cope with their circumstances.

I think societies with welfare have less need for religion, it becomes a social custom and a part of their culture
Unifying around a falsehood leads to bad results. It is one of the major reasons Iran has been a shithole for so long
 
Developmental Dictatorship is the only way. Park Chung Hee, Chiang Kai Shek, Mussolini, Stalin, Lee Kuan Yew, Paul Kagame etc.
 
The main causes as to why a developing nation remains developing are:

1. Corruption
2. Food security/environmental
3. Overpollution
4. Exploitation

There are no institutions in 3rd world nations, people are encouraged to be corrupt and scam as much as possible, take Brazil as an example, corruption is like the weed that grows with a crop, in the case of Brazil it grew into gangs and organizations which de-facto control parts of their country.

Food security and environmental factors, Sudan is a good case of this and most of the middle eastern countries are aswell, Sudan is an arid nation which relies heavily on imported food, thereby becoming reliant on others to survive, this combined with racial and religious problems turned it into a warzone. Everyone is encouraged to rape and pillage and fend for themselves, there are no institutions or safety nets that keep the Sudanese society united.

In the case of overpollution and exploitation you can look at Indonesia and Nigeria. All of these points are tied together. Companies from developed nations export their labour into poorer nations, because the labour value provided by a Nigerian is equal to that of someone in a developed nation, except the the people in poorer nations hold very little global economic value. Cities in China, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc experience heavy amount of smog from factories.

Not only do undeveloped nations have to deal with domestic problems, companies from developed nations want to also create an environment which would have your country rely on these companies.

The cycle of going from an impoverish nation to a developed one goes something like this from my observations:

1. Agricultural state (undeveloped)
2. Labour state (semi-developed)
3. Service exporting state (developed)

Though you have to keep in mind many of the countries today are artificially created and can barely reach the first state. Being a developed country means your primary exports are services to other countries. It would be imperative to your own growth to create an environment in which undeveloped countries would keep providing your country with cheap labour.
There is no universal progress nor is there such thing as linear progress. There is only the tension between the Form of a culture and the Chaos of its environment. The resulting effect of the culture and its environment is Nomos which is the degradation of what is sacred. Nigeria for example, is Western duval being externalized. It is in no way progressing. Linear progress in general is garbage. The end result of all this "progress" is worldcity, which simply put, is a mechanistic hell ran by a parasitic state. I also don't define exporting to the periphery as anywhere close to the definition of progression which is far too abstract to define, but in context, the reason these civilizations appear so primitive is because they skipped the labour stage of civilizational development and went into the agricultural stage of civilizational development. This is what some of my favorite authors, Spengler and Toynbee posit essentially.
 
Most of them aren't really developing at all - that's just their natural state.
 
There is no universal progress nor is there such thing as linear progress. There is only the tension between the Form of a culture and the Chaos of its environment. The resulting effect of the culture and its environment is Nomos which is the degradation of what is sacred. Nigeria for example, is Western duval being externalized. It is in no way progressing. Linear progress in general is garbage. The end result of all this "progress" is worldcity, which simply put, is a mechanistic hell ran by a parasitic state. I also don't define exporting to the periphery as anywhere close to the definition of progression which is far too abstract to define, but in context, the reason these civilizations appear so primitive is because they skipped the labour stage of civilizational development and went into the agricultural stage of civilizational development. This is what some of my favorite authors, Spengler and Toynbee posit essentially.
Africa is a perpetual stalemate of warring cultures tbh
 
The state in Afrcia is just which Western colonial vestige accommodates to the tribal peoples needs in x environment.
 
nice post. I would add:

5. Religion

There is a correlation between high religiosity and lower economic development. We see this especially with Muslim countries. One of the reasons I believe China will overtake the US in terms of GDP within the next 25 years is because they are an Atheist country. Atheism allows for rational decision making.
Putting the cart before the horse
If life is going well than you wont need religion to get you through the day compared to someone in the favela
 
It has everything to do with IQ. If a nation has a low IQ on average, it's fucked. If it has a high IQ, it prospers.
 
It has everything to do with IQ. If a nation has a low IQ on average, it's fucked. If it has a high IQ, it prospers.
It depends upon how badly the politician wants to do it. In the end most 3rd world leaders are selfish fags who make their kids settle in first world country and keep all money in their pockets
 
Even if a nation somehow gets itself together USA will find a way to go there and bomb them. Russia and China only avoided direct war so far because they have nukes.
 
Even if a nation somehow gets itself together USA will find a way to go there and bomb them. Russia and China only avoided direct war so far because they have nukes.
You are the most cringe third worldist on this site nigga just stop. No one cares about your grift.
 
Last edited:
You are the most cringe third wordlist on this site nigga just stop. No one cares about your grift.
stfu and go back to epstein island
 
nice post. I would add:

5. Religion

There is a correlation between high religiosity and lower economic development. We see this especially with Muslim countries. One of the reasons I believe China will overtake the US in terms of GDP within the next 25 years is because they are an Atheist country. Atheism allows for rational decision making.
What about Iran? They are a very technologically developed theocracy? Although perhaps the population itself is more secular

I agree with you about China but I think it's more about the economics and social cohesion of the country. They nationalized the land, banking, and commanding heights of the economy while still allowing "profit" to function in key sectors. However, the government can override it at pretty much any time via CCP cells if they need to adhere to the 5 year plans.
 
Even if a nation somehow gets itself together USA will find a way to go there and bomb them. Russia and China only avoided direct war so far because they have nukes.
Every competent leader = wicked dictator
 
:soy: it just takes time and investment bro
 
Open up to global trade, liberalise the economy, enforce IP and private property then stabilise the nation for foreign investments.
 
Dip it in acid in a darkroom
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top