Also no matter how fast you run, if you run in circles, you're still going nowhere.
I think many intellectuals have a narrow view of the world. Also because they are often physically weak and unattractive, they exhibit very little masculine behavior and as a result, they are usually clueless about sex, women and how important they are for most men. Basically, they are bluepilled AF. They usually find a wife because they statusmaxx with their PhD and University tenure or something, but that's about it.
Like Darwin and Einstein, who married their cousins IIRC. Newton and Tesla, who were volcels. It is fine for a scientist, I suppose, but it's problematic for anyone who has more general intellectual ambition, like a philosopher or a politician.
A French former PUA once said something along the line that it's ridiculous to pretend you know anything about the world when you don't know anything about half the human population. He took the example of Emmanuel Kant, who notoriously masturbated behind a tree every day during his routine walk.
Nietzche had unsuccessful experiences with women, but at least he was whoremaxxing. I believe this can be seen in his work, he was IMHO one of the most black pilled philosopher.
Intelligence is the ability to process information. What you get from using intelligence is knowledge and wisdom. If you're intelligent but you never use your intelligence for anything intellectually valuable, you can't be considered smart or wise. You're just what people call an expert, I think. Like if you use your intelligence to play chess or poker all day, or to research obscure mathematics and do nothing else. It is fine, you do what you want, but it's kind of a waste. Einstein himself once said something like that about Wilhelm Steinitz, one of the earliest chess World Champion.
STEMcels are dumb in the sense that they let themselves being exploited by people that are much less intelligent than them. And they don't even see it because they ignore a lot about human nature.
