Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Has anybody watched Goatis’ blackpill vid

Grainbrain_Zombie

Grainbrain_Zombie

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 12, 2026
Posts
80
Rawmeat youtuber Goatis made a video on the blackpill

He re-examined the blackpill and tried to explain female obsession with aesthetics from a natural selection pov. To be honest i went in thinking he would do some virtue signalling pandering to normies but he very much accepts that female brain operates entirely on lookism. I subbed to him after that. Guy comes off nutty but is definitely a real truthseeker. So here’s the gist of his view:

He flips the theory of genetic determinism on its head and says **it’s not the genes which decide your success** . It’s your success which decides your Genes.

So an animal successful in feeding itself on a high trophic level (ideally eating carnivorous animals, their blood and milk) will procure the most nutrients for itself and, the way nature works is that your Success as a hunter will be rewarded with a change in your epigenome.
You’ll have better skin, hair, health etc. But the real change will be observed in your offspring who will be much more aesthetic and sexually attractive, to signal to females that it was born from a successful hunter. So aesthetics is nothing but a social signalling mechanism in animals to distinguish individuals that were born from and raised by successful hunters from graineater losers who had to resort to the ignobility of pulling weeds and plants out of the ground and into their mouth to survive.

I’m VERY interested in this theory because it is extremely consistent with the Racepill.

We curries are famously fugly and coincidentally have eons of slavery, grain-eating and vegetarianism in our history.

But the nordic/german europeans ended up with their prettier features because of their diet filled with meat and milk.

And from a common sense POV. Does it make any sense that natural selection and sexual selection are purely a game of lottery? Wouldn’t that misguide a species evolutiom?

Or does it make more sense that the successful hunter is rewarded with more reproductive success?

It can’t be coincidence.
Goatis is definitely right. I have already started consuming raw meat and can feel my PSL ascendinf.
 
Rawmeat youtuber Goatis made a video on the blackpill

He re-examined the blackpill and tried to explain female obsession with aesthetics from a natural selection pov. To be honest i went in thinking he would do some virtue signalling pandering to normies but he very much accepts that female brain operates entirely on lookism. I subbed to him after that. Guy comes off nutty but is definitely a real truthseeker. So here’s the gist of his view:

He flips the theory of genetic determinism on its head and says **it’s not the genes which decide your success** . It’s your success which decides your Genes.

So an animal successful in feeding itself on a high trophic level (ideally eating carnivorous animals, their blood and milk) will procure the most nutrients for itself and, the way nature works is that your Success as a hunter will be rewarded with a change in your epigenome.
You’ll have better skin, hair, health etc. But the real change will be observed in your offspring who will be much more aesthetic and sexually attractive, to signal to females that it was born from a successful hunter. So aesthetics is nothing but a social signalling mechanism in animals to distinguish individuals that were born from and raised by successful hunters from graineater losers who had to resort to the ignobility of pulling weeds and plants out of the ground and into their mouth to survive.

I’m VERY interested in this theory because it is extremely consistent with the Racepill.

We curries are famously fugly and coincidentally have eons of slavery, grain-eating and vegetarianism in our history.

But the nordic/german europeans ended up with their prettier features because of their diet filled with meat and milk.

And from a common sense POV. Does it make any sense that natural selection and sexual selection are purely a game of lottery? Wouldn’t that misguide a species evolutiom?

Or does it make more sense that the successful hunter is rewarded with more reproductive success?

It can’t be coincidence.
Goatis is definitely right. I have already started consuming raw meat and can feel my PSL ascendinf.
hes a normie
 
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
 
Goatis is definitely right. I have already started consuming raw meat and can feel my PSL ascendinf.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES
nicholas cage GIF


:bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
 
Rawmeat youtuber Goatis made a video on the blackpill

He re-examined the blackpill and tried to explain female obsession with aesthetics from a natural selection pov. To be honest i went in thinking he would do some virtue signalling pandering to normies but he very much accepts that female brain operates entirely on lookism. I subbed to him after that. Guy comes off nutty but is definitely a real truthseeker. So here’s the gist of his view:

He flips the theory of genetic determinism on its head and says **it’s not the genes which decide your success** . It’s your success which decides your Genes.

So an animal successful in feeding itself on a high trophic level (ideally eating carnivorous animals, their blood and milk) will procure the most nutrients for itself and, the way nature works is that your Success as a hunter will be rewarded with a change in your epigenome.
You’ll have better skin, hair, health etc. But the real change will be observed in your offspring who will be much more aesthetic and sexually attractive, to signal to females that it was born from a successful hunter. So aesthetics is nothing but a social signalling mechanism in animals to distinguish individuals that were born from and raised by successful hunters from graineater losers who had to resort to the ignobility of pulling weeds and plants out of the ground and into their mouth to survive.

I’m VERY interested in this theory because it is extremely consistent with the Racepill.

We curries are famously fugly and coincidentally have eons of slavery, grain-eating and vegetarianism in our history.

But the nordic/german europeans ended up with their prettier features because of their diet filled with meat and milk.

And from a common sense POV. Does it make any sense that natural selection and sexual selection are purely a game of lottery? Wouldn’t that misguide a species evolutiom?

Or does it make more sense that the successful hunter is rewarded with more reproductive success?

It can’t be coincidence.
Goatis is definitely right. I have already started consuming raw meat and can feel my PSL ascendinf.
Sv3rige is an extremist. He went from being a hardcore vegan to being a hardcore primalist. Both diets have flaws.

One more than the other, OFC.
 
Humans started cooking their meat because they would die from illnesses if they ate a sick animal that they hunted. Humans can digest raw meat but it was too risky for hunter gatherers to eat it raw, if you had your own farm, it wouldn't be so risky.

The reason people are so fuck ugly and recessed nowadays is because 95% of everything in the supermarket is processed garbage that is designed to be as addictive as drugs while saturated fats have been demonized for years, people think that seed oil slop is healthier :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Diet can probably help your descendants. If you start drinking milk now, your own bones aren't gonna change.
 
Humans started cooking their meat because they would die from illnesses if they ate a sick animal that they hunted. Humans can digest raw meat but it was too risky for hunter gatherers to eat it raw, if you had your own farm, it wouldn't be so risky.

The reason people are so fuck ugly and recessed nowadays is because 95% of everything in the supermarket is processed garbage that is designed to be as addictive as drugs while saturated fats have been demonized for years, people think that seed oil slop is healthier :feelskek: :feelskek:
Well said, this is the more realistic approach
 
U agree on his new blackpill theory?
"his" blackpill theory ? What bro , he s a failed wannabee influencer he did roids when he saw he started losing hair because of it he stopped and lost all of his muscles than he started doing videos against working out because he s mentally too weak to train and diet natty , plus videos debunking him as a liar saying behind the camera he eats mcdonalds and cookies lmfao and people still fall for this type of weirdo online lol , still thousands of people watching him lol.
 

Similar threads

Giracel
Replies
8
Views
549
Brainy
Brainy
grimlockcel
Replies
5
Views
507
Vinícius truecel
Vinícius truecel
E
Replies
1
Views
265
erenyeager
E
Vinícius truecel
Replies
2
Views
229
Vinícius truecel
Vinícius truecel
Clavicus Vile
Replies
4
Views
538
Pancakecel
Pancakecel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top