One would need a Tsar bomba to enforce such a policy.
Nuke this gay earth.
Basic supply and demand + historical perspective. Before foids went into the workplace, salaries were at least triple what they are today.
Salaries having stagnated is a Socialist myth.
No, it's not.
Boomers would get a job at 16, marry at 19, have a house, two cars and three kids by the time they were 25.
You can't do that nowadays.
What your average young worker can do with his salary is buy funko pops, steam games and t-shirts.
Japan is actually a good example of a country with a high demand for new workers yet also high unemployment.
That's because foids refuse marriage, and work there. Each foid at work incurs the cost of one unemployed male + unemployment benefits for him. What are the odds that the foid is so productive that hiring her offsets the costs of having an extra unemployed man in society?
all it would do is remove a large demand that would immediately be filled up with male immigrants.
Not necessarily.
Foids work making stuff that wouldn't be necessary if they were in the house -- HR, schools, and fast-food, are three examples.
Also, foids earning wages drives up male competition, which results in men buying useless shit to impress foids.
The fashion industry, for instance. In the 1940's, men had 5 or 6 shirts and 2 shoes, foids would have 5 or 6 dresses and two or three shoes. When a cloth became torn from wear and tear, it would just be patched up, stitched and would go back to action. Shoeshiners would polish a shoe and nail new soles when there were holes in them. People bought new clothes basically in birthdays and christmas. There was never a demand for "fashionmaxxing" until foids were put to work out of the house. Today any teenager needs hundreds of shirts, shoes, etc. --- this is all driven by sexual competition, the need to impress other people (males-males, females-females, male-female) -- which is a direct result of allowing foids to have unrestrained sexual agency.
I have always found it quite fascinating how my ancestors were having low numerical wages but could sustain 10 childrens.
It's a mystery for you, but not for me.
Sustaining 10 children is quite cheap and easy. Kids just need three things: roof, clothes, food. All three are incredibly cheap. Even shithole africans who live in the mud can sustain 10 kids by baking bricks in the sun, or cutting grass by the riverside and feeding it to goats.
What is
really expensive is trying to please an ungrateful foid with a dick-count in the hundreds, that resents you for not being the Chaddest Chad that once fucked her brains out in a nightclub, while she also earns more than you -- and then getting divorce-raped after 5 years.
80% of the consumer economy today consists in men and women buying useless shit to sexually compete with each other. Men have to "fashionmaxx", and have a nice car, be willing to mortgage a McMansion, etc. in order to impress foids; while foids buy tons of make-up, clothes and accessories to attract Chad.
EXHIBIT ONE:
This is a LUXURY wardrobe -- what it used to be before foids were allowed to work outside the house.
As you can see it has space to hang a dozen shirts -- tops, plus some drawers for underwear, socks, ties, 4 pairs of shoes (two in each of the the bottom drawers).
Nowadays, any middle class house has a walk-in closet (or two) in order to accommodate all the useless garments a man needs to buy in order to not be considered a hobo in social situations. Men were HAPPY to wear the same shirt every day, patch it up until the fiber would dissolve beyond repair. It was sexual competition that drove the consumerist industry to insane heights.