Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Goyslop, the environment & hinduism are the reasons jeets are incels

If it was a simple race mixing like in Latin America, you would see whiter = more European Ancestry.
It is racemixing. Curryland is the result of three highly divergent populations colliding:

• AASI (South Eurasian, Andamanese-like)
• Neolithic Iranian HG (West Eurasian, not the same as genetically modern Iranians)
• Andronovo/Steppe_MLBA (West Eurasian, basically early modern European + BMAC (West Asian-like))

Steppe DNA tracks cleanly with skin lightness, though some South Indian mid castes can also be light-ish and have high height potential thanks to high Neolithic Iranian
 
Last edited:
There are height differences, skin colour differences among different subgroups of Indian peoples.
No shit

In my opinion, Brahmin caste do seem to have different statistical averages on education attainment and IQ than every other Indian subgroup.
When did I mention IQ retard? I was talking about physical strength. And in any case, brahmins being overrepresented in intellectual fields can be explained by their SES advantage and historical emphasis on literacy instead of an unnecessary, crude genetic oversimplification. And what is even the rationale behind your assertion that Brahmins are genetically predisposed towards higher IQs? Higher Steppe ancestry? If so, does it mean Punjabi/Kashmiri Brahmins are smarter on average than South Indian Brahmins, owing to their much higher Steppe? How does that fare with the reality that South Indian Brahmins have contributed much more to India's STEM industry?
 
Last edited:
Genetic differences track more with caste than region. A typical Southern Brahmin has more Neolithic Iranian and Steppe_MLBA related ancestry than a typical Northern Dalit
Region is still as important as, if not more than, caste. South Indian Brahmins are a different case as they are descendants of Gangetic immigrants who vedicized the South. They are genetically closer to UP Brahmins than they are to the rest of South Indians (except other upper castes). Also Punjabi/NW dalits are about as ANI-shifted as Telugu Brahmins, they cluster right on top of them on Vahaduo iirc.
 
Another thing I suspect but I don’t have data for is that good looking faces are more prevalent in North Indian Rajputs. Hrithik Roshan is a prime example
Hritik Roshan is a Punjabi Brahmin, with some Bengali Brahmin admixture as well. What has he to do with rajputs lol? And there's no such thing as a common rajput phenotype so it makes no sense to speak of them as one group when comparing appearances. Punjabi Rajputs look the same as Jats and Khatris; Gangetic Rajputs look completely different.
 
Steppe DNA tracks cleanly with skin lightness, though some South Indian mid castes can also be light-ish and have high height potential thanks to high Neolithic Iranian
Not really. Kashmiris are the lightest skinned ethnicity in South Asia (much lighter than Jats or Rors) and they only have 25-30% Steppe, with AASI in high 20s or even low 30s, thanks to sexual selection in the mountains. Similar thing happens with Dogras and Himachalis, both are less steppe-shifted than Punjabis on average but lighter skinned thanks to environmental adaptation.

Steppe does correspond to skin colour broadly in South Asia, but it's not absolute.
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
33
Views
918
diffusion
diffusion
Clavicus Vile
Replies
3
Views
345
PLS HALP ME
PLS HALP ME
Oneitiscel
Replies
9
Views
569
outerdarkness
outerdarkness

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →