Incels should have been bred out by now innit.
2
inceldom is mostly caused by feminists,dating apps, social media platforms which all are relatively new. retarded thread
S
There will always be a hierarchy. Attractive people at the top and unatttactive people at the bottom. Average people in between.
Incels will always exist, sadly. Unless society changes itself dramatically
Incels will always exist, sadly. Unless society changes itself dramatically
Every species has incels despite natural selection existing for a long time.
Incels will always exist unless society enforces rules that make women have sex involuntarily. Foids have been programmed to not have sex with a certain percentage of the population.
An infinity of time had already elaspe up till the present moment, any natural selection should have done its work already hmm
There will always be variance and the males at the bottom of that pole will not reproduce.
Exterminate short men and women and problem will be decreased by 80%
males find subhuman foids attractive, society enforced monogamy and foids didnt get to choose, and naturally subhumans born do not survived.
monogamy only existed since the Christian era which is short as compared to millions of years
Nah monogamy probably existed since a long time before that. The fact that we can feel love is proof of that
there would be those that will not get to fuck as chad will form harem in the wild.
but there is also this remarkable study where there is a behavior where foids fuck all the men in the group so that no male will be jealous and take care of the kid as nobody knows whose kid it is and the sperm will fight with other sperm in the pussy and the best one gets to the egg.
there are mostly fighter sperm in a the male ejaculation whose only work is to fight other sperm.
I was thinking a similar thing about autism. If it is a inferior genetic trait than why hasn't it been erased from the gene pool? I will make a thread
Harems don't exist in the wild among humans, because a man can provide only one woman as a hunter-gatherer (rarely two).
For example, only 4% of men of the Hadza tribe have 2 wives, and 0 of them have 3. So, if we assume that the gender distribution is 50/50, then incels will be no more than 4%.
«Polyandrous marriages do not exist but about 4 percent of men have two concurrent wives.»
How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate
It has been argued that size matters on the human mate market: both stated preferences and mate choices have been found to be non-random with respect to height and weight. But how universal are these patterns? Most of the literature on human mating patterns ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
R
natural selection isnt a magical process..it has no ends, no meaning, just like everything else in this world
D
Shit tier women will always breed
Leading to an ever ending cycle of subhumanity
Leading to an ever ending cycle of subhumanity
W
Its because humans are so young as a species. It could take like 100,000+ years to get optimization.
Humans appeared between 500,000 and 320,000 BC. ~180 thousand years of evolution from Homo Erectus to Early Homo Sapiens, and ~120 thousand years of evolution from Early Homo Sapiens to Anatomically Modern Humans.
No incels will never go away, because you will always have males who are uglier than others.
this.
Natural selection already did it's job. On average males are more handsome than they were 4000 years ago.
It's always a spectrum that just moves up the looks scale. You will always have the handsome and the ugly.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
