as for actual men, I'm pretty confident most men are not attracted to them, myself included.
I don't have any desire whatsoever to do anything sexual with a guy no matter how much of a Chad he is.
You don't have any CONSCIOUS desire.
I find 0% to be an unprovable hypothesis though.
My theory for example is that every man has at least a 0.000001% attraction to oak trees.
Some deep reptilian part of your brain at war with other parts of your brain wants to fuck that oak tree.
It's so minor that we're probably not even aware of it and laugh at the idea. But it's still there, subconciously.
I imagine wanting to fuck anything whatsoever (tunafish, car exhaust pipes, etc) has some kind of sub-1% component. So obviously that would need to extend to guys too.
The idea being we may have some archtype of "gets us most horny" (ideal woman or whatev) we call 100% excitement, and then as things deviate from that, it lowers from 100% to 10% to 1% to 0.1% and so on.
It depends on what degree these other things are different from that archtype.
In terms of coping, even if it's a negligible difference (because we have standards, and we aren't so desperate for sex that we'll lower past a certain % of acceptability) we'd probably want to fuck a hermaphrodite human over a male duck, for example.
I think that explains a lot of "prison gay" situations. A lot of them are fags to begin with, but a lot of it is just coping by Tyrones who are so used to getting pussy from negresses that they can't fathom the idea of long-term celibacy and would rather cope with man-anus than have blue balls.
I think that's the difference with us. Unlike Tyrone, we don't have a sudden shock from 100% access to coom w/ foids to 0% access. We've lived our whole lives with 0% access and built up a tolerance to the blue balls, so we do not cope as desperately and degenerately as Tyrone does when he goes to jail and must nut in anything even if it's a trap or rape.
Chadsexuals
