JFL at people who actually believe lesbians exist.

[ReturnOfSaddam]

The term "gold star lesbian" (i.e. a dyke who's never been with a man) exists for a reason, the fact that you never fucking find them. Can you imagine some gay guy describing himself as a "gold star gay"? Fuck no lmao because it's just the norm. Gay guys are hardly ever attracted to women, when you see some overly flamboyant gay guy you know for sure that he's never been with a woman. This is not the case with lesbians at all. They are just extreme Chadsexuals. I wonder how many redditors there actually are out there who genuinely believe their crush is a lesbian rather than a girl who's just waiting for Chad.

MEME GENDER. Why don't we use that phrase anymore? It was so accurate. They literally are a fucking meme. She says she has a type of guy she likes (oh really, wow...) and some fucking idiot cuck is dumb enough to actually ask what kind, as if he can fucking become it lmao, and SURPRISE SURPRISE it's tal, good looking guys she wants. That's SOOOO unique, a girl who likes tall guys? Wow! She really is a lesbian and not bisexual at all, she only likes 10% of guys (as opposed to straight women who find all men attractive!!!111)

 

[Deleted member 14218]

i only find 10% of men attractive

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Bro you make the highest IQ threads on this forum

absolutely correct, lesbians are just mega chadsexuals who can't get the chads they want. Simple as that

 

[WØLF]

Bro you make the highest IQ threads on this forum

absolutely correct, lesbians are just mega chadsexuals who can't get the chads they want. Simple as that

OP is unironically an intellectual

 

[Ping And Pong]

You are 100% right, lesbian = chadsexual. It's actually hilarious how many times I've seen lesbians online say they do have a small exception of men they like (chad).

You can tell from behaviour and expression alone that a guy is gay.
You cannot do this with foids.

What do we learn from this? Foids must be disciplined and conttolled by men for the good of society.

 

[Justice Bao]

i only find 10% of men attractive

extrem chadsexual. "regular" women find at least 20% of men attractive (according to research)

Bro you make the highest IQ threads on this forum

absolutely correct, lesbians are just mega chadsexuals who can't get the chads they want. Simple as that

 

[metabuxx]

Bro you make the highest IQ threads on this forum

absolutely correct, lesbians are just mega chadsexuals who can't get the chads they want. Simple as that

 

[TheIncelRepublic]

Bro you make the highest IQ threads on this forum

absolutely correct, lesbians are just mega chadsexuals who can't get the chads they want. Simple as that

Fucking love the @ReturnOfSaddam dude, he is so fucking high IQ

 

[Legionarivs]

Astronomical high IQ OP, I always said that

 

[Made in Heaven]

lesbian = chadsexual.

 

[RichCel]

OP is a tard.

Dykes do exist, just like fags exist. They are just not the hot porno foids, they are ugly and usually fat slobbos that barely pass as human.

Now, when an attractive foid says "I'm lesbian/bisexual" then yes, she's a "chadsexual" who is just doing the lesbo bit for attention whoring (just like geek/gamer girls do their bits for attention whoring). If that's what the OP meant, then he just can't write clearly.

 

[genetic_scrap]

Women use "I'm a lesbian" to just shoo away the unattractive men.

When an attractive man shows up, suddenly they're open.

 

[ElliotRodgerHere]

OP is a tard.

Dykes do exist, just like fags exist. They are just not the hot porno foids, they are ugly and usually fat slobbos that barely pass as human.

Now, when an attractive foid says "I'm lesbian/bisexual" then yes, she's a "chadsexual" who is just doing the lesbo bit for attention whoring (just like geek/gamer girls do their bits for attention whoring). If that's what the OP meant, then he just can't write clearly.

Spread your kike lies somewhere else faggot. Any sexual behaviors that deviate from the norm are perversions

 

[RichCel]

Spread your kike lies somewhere else faggot. Any sexual behaviors that deviate from the norm are perversions

Where did I say it's not a perversion, you silly goy?

 

[ElliotRodgerHere]

Where did I say it's not a perversion, you silly goy?

When you affirm that homosexuals exist. Now you want to back peddle from your earlier post?

 

[RichCel]

When you affirm that homosexuals exist. Now you want to back peddle from your earlier post?

Homos exist, dykes exist, they are filthy perverts who deserve to be burned alive and spend the eternity in hellfire.

And you are still a dumb fuck goy.

 

[slavcel11]

wow 10% is not bad at all definitely not chad chaser foid npc mode.

 

[kikecel]

Spread your kike lies somewhere else faggot. Any sexual behaviors that deviate from the norm are perversions

אוי ווי יש פה אנטישמי צוקרברג תחסום אותו בבקשה

btw lesbians are cope theyre just chadsexuals

 

[Ignas]

>got a very specific type

Jfl @ this woman just say you like Chad kek. It's not like her specific type of men that she likes are so specific, 5'2-5'6 bald Indian janitor for example. Of course her type is Chad who would've thought. It fuels me with rage that everytime a woman says she has a certain type of men that she likes, I can always bet my life they're chads

 

[Deleted member 24529]

This is what 100% foids think but only few say out loud.

 

[Sportbro]

i only find 10% of men attractive

The non self-aware blackpills

 

[deathsh+rt]

True lesbians are just foids who are holding out for Chad.

 

[UKhapacel]

When you affirm that homosexuals exist. Now you want to back peddle from your earlier post?

Just passin by to pay my respects to the supreme gentleman

 

[ilieknothing]

It's funny how the foid thinks their "type" is something special and no other foid likes that.

 

[Bangkok or bust]

Is that why tons of bulkdyke landwhales are lesbians? They couldn't get Chad?

 

[orchis]

I cant take lesbians seriously

 

[Deleted member 140]

Chsdsexual

 

[mänline]

from this https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-18372-0

Subjective ratings. Compared with non-homosexual women, homosexual women had significantly more negative (i.e., gynephilic) Male-Female contrasts for both pictures (p = 0.015) and videos (p < 0.001). That is, homosexual women showed a greater preference for pictures and videos of females relative to males, compared with both bisexual and heterosexual women.

Ventral striatum activation patterns. Homosexual women had significantly more female-biased ventral striatum responses compared to non-homosexual women for pictures (p = 0.002), but not videos.

So there is a significant difference, but I also see no exclusivity of preference for female stimuli in "homosexual women".

Then from the review study I already used here;

The Specificity of Women’s Sexual Response and Its Relationship with Sexual Orientations: A Review and Ten Hypotheses - Archives of Sexual Behavior

Category-specific sexual response describes a pattern wherein the individual shows significantly greater responses to preferred versus nonpreferred categories of sexual stimuli; this pattern is described as gender specific for sexual orientation to gender, or gender nonspecific if lacking...

link.springer.com

direct from one abstract, linked there.

Sexual arousal is category-specific in men; heterosexual men are more aroused by female than by male sexual stimuli, whereas homosexual men show the opposite pattern. There is reason to believe that female sexual arousal is organized differently. We assessed genital and subjective sexual arousal to male and female sexual stimuli in women, men, and postoperative male-to-female transsexuals. In contrast to men, women showed little category specificity on either the genital or the subjective measure. Both heterosexual and homosexual women experienced strong genital arousal to both male and female sexual stimuli.

some quotes from the review:

The studies that focused on women's sexual response showed gender-nonspecific sexual response among predominantly androphilic and gynephilic women (Chivers et al., 2004; Chivers & Bailey, 2005).

Sylva et al. (2013) showed that androphilic and gynephilic women had more gender-specific response in the dorsal striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate, brain areas associated with reward and cognitive control, respectively. This activation was not, however, of the same magnitude as observed for gynephilic men; “women showed a stronger limbic response than men to nonpreferred-sex stimuli (relative to resting baseline).

Wincze and Qualls (1984) reported on the companion study examining sexual responses in self-identified lesbian and gay men, and found lesbian women (predominantly/exclusively gynephilic, based on Kinsey scores) showed greatest genital response to lesbian and group sex films, with significant increase in genital response to other categories (heterosexual and gay sex) versus neutral; women's subjective response was not significantly gender specific. The Wincze et al. group concluded that sexual response was gender specific for both women and men, despite reporting somewhat gender-nonspecific patterns for women. Data from Laan’s research group (Laan et al., 1995) contributed to this equivocal picture in the 1990s, showing gender-nonspecific genital and subjective sexual responses among self-identified lesbian and heterosexual women to films of lesbian and heterosexual oral and penetrative sex. In an ingenious manipulation, this group also amplified genital responding to these stimuli through the addition of hands-free genital vibration, and the same pattern emerged.

But this doesn't mean there are no difference in sexual response to found. Some gender-specific findings in Spoilers:

Spoiler

Chivers, Seto, and Blanchard (2007) tested the hypothesis that, perhaps, nonspecific genital response was related to the intensity of sexual stimuli; we reasoned that nonspecific response might represent a ceiling effect in women’s genital responses obtained within the 2-min videos. By reducing the intensity of the sexual stimuli from couples engaging in sex acts to solitary people masturbating, and by including solitary images of nude males and females exercising and not engaged in any sexual activity, we could obtain a clearer picture of genital and subjective responses to gender cues. By reducing the intensity of sexual activity, we revealed that gynephilic women did have gender-specific genital and subjective sexual responses: Androphilic women continued to be a mystery, showing gender-nonspecific responses in both genital and subjective arousal, regardless of the intensity of sexual activity depicted.

First a mixed one: Lesbians reactions to high-intensity stimulus are gender-nonspecific, not for low-intensity stimulus. (they went from sex videos to pics of nude people, but I think also Chad itself can be a high-intensity stimulus).
This is inline with this:

Spoiler: 1

Dawson, Fretz, and Chivers (2016) further examined visual attention phenomena among women, demonstrating gender-specific latency to first fixations among ambiphilic (sexually attracted to both women and men) and gynephilic women, and replicating nonspecific initial visual attention among androphilic women.

Spoiler: 2

Conversely, Jiang, Costello, Fang, Huang, and He (2006) showed gender-specific effects using an attentional paradigm whereby subliminal presentation of sexual stimuli depicting nude women or men would, hypothetically, bias attention and improve task performance when task items were presented on the same side as the preferred stimulus. Androphilic women showed better task performance when items were presented on the same side as male images, whereas predominantly gynephilic women were less discriminating, an atypical result that has not yet been replicated.

Spoiler: 3

Total time spent viewing a sexual stimulus (not just to focal regions of interest, as in eye-tracking studies) is another measure of explicit cognitive processing of sexual stimuli. Gender-specific patterns for explicit cognitive processing measures, like viewing time, are more variable and tend to show gender specificity, particularly for gynephilic women, albeit less robustly than typically reported for men. Androphilic women have shown both gender-nonspecific viewing times for sexual stimuli (Dawson, Suschinsky, & Lalumière, 2012; Ebsworth & Lalumière, 2012; Israel & Strassberg, 2009; Lippa, 2013; Lippa, Patterson, & Marelich, 2010; Rieger et al., 2015), or small effect gender-specific responses (e.g., Imhoff et al., 2010; Quinsey, Ketsetzis, Earls, & Karamanoukian, 1996), whereas gynephilic women more clearly show gender-specific viewing times (Ebsworth & Lalumière, 2012; Lippa, 2012; Rieger et al., 2015; Rullo, Strassberg, & Israel, 2010).

Spoiler: 4

In summary, the data examining early visual attention and implicit processing of sexual cues generally shows gender-nonspecific effects for androphilic women and gender-specific effects for gynephilic women. The data on later visual attention and explicit processing of sexual cues are more variable in terms of gender nonspecificity among androphilic women; however, the few studies available generally report gender specificity for gynephilic women.

Spoiler: 5

Rieger and Savin-Williams (2012) and Rieger et al. (2015) have shown that androphilic women have a gender-nonspecific pattern of pupil dilation, versus the more gender-specific patterns observed for gynephilic women or for men. Notably, Rieger et al. also showed that genital responses to female sexual stimuli, assessed via VPP, were significantly associated with pupil dilation to female stimuli, and this effect was more pronounced for gynephilic women.

Spoiler: 7

(Chivers et al., 2007). Gynephilic and androphilic women and men reported the strength of their sexual desire by responding to items asking about desire to masturbate (solitary desire) and desire to engage in sex with a partner (dyadic desire), both before and after viewing sexual stimuli. Men and gynephilic women exhibited gender-specific patterns of solitary and dyadic responsive sexual desire, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) greater than .65. Androphilic women's dyadic desire, however, showed significantly less gender specificity, with ds ranging from .41 to .56 for male versus female stimuli, and gender-nonspecific solitary desire in response to masturbation (d = .18) and intercourse stimuli (d = .16). Curiously, solitary desire was significantly greater in response to female than male nude stimuli (d = .51).

I think the simplifying of all this findings: Most Heterosexual women are more homo than most heterosexual man and most homosexual woman are more hetero than most homosexual man maybe really to "Chadsexuality" to different degree

 

[Neggr]

i only find 10% of men attractive

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

The term "gold star lesbian" (i.e. a dyke who's never been with a man) exists for a reason, the fact that you never fucking find them.

Can you imagine some gay guy describing himself as a "gold star gay"?

Fuck no lmao because it's just the norm.

I'm not so sure it is, the majority of "gays" might've actually fucked a woman because they're actually bisexual but just gave up on women because men were easier.

I think the reason they don't do "gold star" culture is because homosexual man are not as openly misogynistic as homosexual women are openly misandric.

Lesbians usually hate the idea of evil cocks spoiling other women for them, whereas gay guys probably DGAF if some guy they're with fucked a pussy in the past.

Gay guys are hardly ever attracted to women,
when you see some overly flamboyant gay guy you know for sure that he's never been with a woman.

Actually no, you don't know that for sure at all.

I happen to know a very flamboyant guy who did gay porn and he's actually predominantly straight. It's just an easy way to make money because he's short and isn't worried about 'straight guy rep' because he's into lolis like me and is just coping best he can due to society banning them.

I wonder how many redditors there actually are out there who genuinely believe their crush is a lesbian rather than a girl who's just waiting for Chad.

Caity Lotz (who plays Sara Lance in Arrow / Legends of Tomorrow) is a lesbian icon just because her char Sara has a GF, even though Sara's bi (fucked Oliver Queen and John Constantine before/after the GF) and even though Caity has dated 100% chads IRL

Also in Arrowverse, Ruby Rose (portrays Katy Kane = Batwoman) is supposed to be lesbian IRL like her char but she was obviously getting fucked by Vin Diesel IRL

Lesbians are masters of cope.

You can tell from behaviour and expression alone that a guy is gay.

I disagree with that. You're just thinking of the Jack MacFarland stereotype but the Will Truman type would obviosly be a lot more subtle.

The whole effeminate thing is probably less than 50% of gays.

 

[Indari]

who fuckign cares retard. autism over labels is IT shit

 

[Deleted member 26884]

LESBIANS = FOIDS WHO HAVEN'T FOUND A CHAD YET