Homeless people don't get sent to prison for being homeless, criminals do get sent to prison for being criminals
Your point is?
Being sent to jail is not an indicator of being "low" on the totem pole, you are still thinking like a normie, with all the values you were indoctrinated to believe
In one country you can be sent to jail for having sex with a 16 year old and in another you can legally marry one, legality doesn't determine the "lowness" of an act
Ironically a career criminal has money, resources, women and the respect of members in his community, a homeless man has literally nothing, but you are so blinded by the VBS (Vestigial Blue Pill Syndrome) of morality that you just have to rationalize a homeless man being "better than" a criminal when
HE OBJECTIVELY ISN'T (subjective standards don't matter)
Ask yourself what are the benefits of being a criminal and what are the benefits of being a homeless man, its that simple, once you start putting emotion (morals) into the equation it blurs your judgement because objective criteria no longer matters, it all comes down to how
YOU PERSONALLY feel about a topic and that
DIFFERS WITH EVERY PERSON
Which means the criteria isn't dependable to gauge anything at all
Whatever you personally may think, a homeless man is still above a criminal, at least according to the state he is.
Yes and according to society (the state) a man who is just born better looking than you will have innate advantages in gaining employment, have relationships, etc and that's completely alright and nothing should be done to regulate the distribution of these things in society, but you are still expected to contribute to said society and work hard
According to the state women serve 60% lower sentences for the same crimes as a man, but that's alright I guess because the state is obviously the perfect instrument to gauge someones "level" in society
There is no consistency in the logic of men like you, society goes from being the arbiter of what decisions you can make to "unfair" and "illogical" whenever it suits you, or to be more accurate, whenever it suits your moral sensibilities for that arbitrary line you won't cross (which differs from person to person)
If the state is such an absolute standard of judgement for how "low" a person is I hope you don't have a problem will divorce laws, how the court system favors women, etc, I mean seeing as the state is such a good judge of character and has such a high standard smh
I've said it once and I'll say it again:
MORALFAGS CAN NEVER TRULY BE BLACK PILLED BECAUSE THEY ALL HAVE SOME DEEP ROOTED BIAS OF A "LINE THEY WON'T CROSS" THAT KEEPS THEM BLUE PILLED