deleted fren
Everything burns
-
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Posts
- 43,116
- Online time
- 1h 50m
Basically, she benefited from dei and was making it so that other women would benefit from said privileges, and her position was cut.
Per usual, she and her foid sisters lable this as OPPRESSION. Because having special programs cut that = a higher chance of getting a job is the same as being discriminated against based on identity.
It's funny how they confirm the same shit I've been saying. Without dei and special quotas, women would not get these special jobs that allow them to live comfortable easy lives. Prior to the 1960s and disperate impact, most women could work jobs, but since these jobs were manual labor related ones, they opted to leach off of a man instead because it was easier.
Female empowerment has always been completely artificial and driven by quotas and laws. Without these privileges, you'll see the empowerment disappears.
"By men who lack the necessary skills"
Men on average get higher SAT scores than women in regards to math. There's also much more high IQ men than there are women. I'd say a man who has a good grasp of complex math and problems is better suited to a tech job than a midwit woman who barely passes due to the existence of dei. The fact that they can't get these jobs without dei proves that they're not valuable. If they were actually above average they'd be able to compete with men without quotes in place.
It's also worth noting that women are overrepresented in education due to affirmative action and special grants existing for them.
Wow, more quotas!
Boo hoo, she lost a position she was only going to be given for having a vagina.
Let me use their favorite quote against them
Misogyny = cutting off special privileges and free gibbs from women. This is what feminism has always been about. Guilt tripping men into giving them free shit for having a vagina.
More crying from foids in dei positions. Anyway, here's what actual discrimination based on identity looks like





