I watched all twenty minutes of Jordan Theresa's video.
I got a very "holier than thou" preachy attitude from all of it.
She's two-faced in that she brags about how "empathetic" she is towards us (not enough to fuck us or anything, but we're supposed to imagine she has some feels in her brain about us that makes it all better) yet doesn't really show much evidence of it.
I've seen this from foids before, they give lip service to empathy but it's virtue-signalling because it doesn't come across.
I'm not saying she has to suck a hundred of our dicks for me to believe her, but simple things like treating us as distinct human beings would be a nice start.
Instead she just parrots definitions off urban dictionary about how EVERY ONE OF US bases our ENTIRE self worth on whether or not we get pussy.
Does it SEEM like that sometimes? Yeah I get that because we do certainly complain about that a lot here. But obviously it's not true, even for those of us who in our darker moments might occasionally say something along those lines just to give voice to our thoughts for examination.
Jordan Theresa doesn't even acknowledge that we have other ways to value ourselves, and that's why I don't think she empathizes with us as people, but rather as things (incels) that she reads off a script.
This is the very thing she complains about us doing to women. Apparently we have "nasty views" and "nasty thoughts" (may not be her exact words, someone feel free to autoscript these rants for easier review) that need correcting, never mind that some of them are just describing reality with a rough accuracy.
The more human problem here is not that we value ourselves ONLY by sexual conquests, but rather that we value ourselves TOO MUCH by it. That it holds sway over us to a detrimental aspect obviously because we fail at it and it's hard to cope when you fail at the thing that holds greatest (or simply major, if not THE greatest) influence over your sense of self-worth.
Of course that's a subjective philosophy thing (should we assess worth by what gives a positive outcome, or worth regardless of the outcome?)
I also sense a lack of empathy here because I don't think Jordan Theresa has really had to be in our position where she can't take for granted an inherent validation as a member of humanity via being desired by her complementing gender.
She also very casually dodges how 'nice guys' do have genuine gripes about foids complaining about personality but putting of a relationship with them for a couple decades of chad-riding.
She's right about many of us being "ex-nice-guys" but that's not exactly requiring much intuition here, we don't exactly hide it.
Hell: it's a false dichotomy: I think a lot of us are still "nice guys" in person but "jerks" on the internet when we can vent.
I don't think that means we're not genuinely nice IRL. Of course it does come down to 'nice' confusingly describing both a behavior and also an attitude which can influence behavior. It might be useful if we had separate words for the internal and external processes to make conversations clearer.
What you will find, Jordan Theresa, is many of us could have potentially been genuinely nice (inside and out) people who gradually became less so as a result of cruelty we were subjected to. Or maybe not even cruelty: just being overlooked.
We try to understand that loneliness. JT you ask what the 'common element' is. You want us to just assume it's our personalities.
Why ours? Why not those of our rejectors? Majority rules?