Blackpill Foid makes IG post of blackpilled nature

[IncelKing]

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C1IvNNIBYUi/?igsh=MTIzcW85aHg1aGlkcg==


When she is rating the men at the airport as “+5”, she’s clearly talking about pERsonality NOT looks (considERing the fact that you can read someone’s pERsonality just by LOOKing at them)

 

[Seahorsecel]

You know its over when society allows women (inferior lifeforms) power over men.

 

[copemaxx9002]

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C1IvNNIBYUi/?igsh=MTIzcW85aHg1aGlkcg==


When she is rating the men at the airport as “+5”, she’s clearly talking about pERsonality NOT looks (considERing the fact that you can read someone’s pERsonality just by LOOKing at them)

she actually means 7/10

 

[PersonaPimp]

 

[TheGrayWolf]

Well this is typical and standard. It's always about looks (face, then height) first of all.

 

[Autistic Uggo]

When she is rating the men at the airport as “+5”, she’s clearly talking about pERsonality NOT looks (considERing the fact that you can read someone’s pERsonality just by LOOKing at them)

She must have seen them reading feminist literature, offering to carry heavy bags for old ladies or sharing (non-offensive) jokes.

 

[Izayacel]

Well this is typical and standard. It's always about looks (face, then height) first of all.

Iq

 

[IncelKing]

She must have seen them reading feminist literature, offering to carry heavy bags for old ladies or sharing (non-offensive) jokes.

She didn’t physically see them do it, but she used hER mind reading powERs to telepathically see those men’s pERsonality through the whole time spectrum: past, present and future, and came to the conclusion that those men have “good pERsonality”.

Thats the only explanation for women’s mate selection behaviour (it’s simply NOT possible that women r attracted to looks, I don’t see how that can even be possible!)