Copexodius Maximus
Mentally destroyed by reality
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
- Posts
- 46,136
There has always been this topic of who has it better that has been looming around: Stacy or Chad
Thanks to @Honeypot and @Autismaxxed for opening my eyes to this.
I will be using the famous OKCupid data for my anaylsis because of it's huge sample size and being done by the company itself, and then delberately hidden because the results would make any rational male realize that it is beyond over.
For anyone saying online dating isn't real life, consider the fact that online dating allows women to choose males in whatever fashion they choose without judgement, which is not the case in real life. Therefore this is actually a better indication of what the sexual market place is relative to each sex's sexual attraction for the other.
All I am doing is basic graph analysis, so I hope you can easily follow along.
If we match an Chad and Megachad to the graphs and see how attractive the male needs to be, this is the result:
8/10 Chad = 2.1 Truefemcel
9/10 Megachad = 3.8 Nearfemcel
This is beyond brootal, this essentially says that a 4/10 female that is below average in looks still mogs Gigachad in terms of sexual desrability.
It is beyond over for the male race at this point, no wonder women don't give a fuck about most men, and why even attractive celebrities get trashed.
Since we know from other studies that looks are also the most important thing out ther for a woman form a male in terms of sexual desirability, this means:
NO MAN IS EVER GOOD ENOUGH FOR A WOMAN UNLESS HE IS A 10/10 Gigachad.
I think this settles the battle of who has it better, not only does Stacy mog Chad to oblivion, but even Femcels mog Chad to the shadow realm.
Thanks to @Honeypot and @Autismaxxed for opening my eyes to this.
I will be using the famous OKCupid data for my anaylsis because of it's huge sample size and being done by the company itself, and then delberately hidden because the results would make any rational male realize that it is beyond over.
For anyone saying online dating isn't real life, consider the fact that online dating allows women to choose males in whatever fashion they choose without judgement, which is not the case in real life. Therefore this is actually a better indication of what the sexual market place is relative to each sex's sexual attraction for the other.
All I am doing is basic graph analysis, so I hope you can easily follow along.
If we match an Chad and Megachad to the graphs and see how attractive the male needs to be, this is the result:
8/10 Chad = 2.1 Truefemcel
9/10 Megachad = 3.8 Nearfemcel
This is beyond brootal, this essentially says that a 4/10 female that is below average in looks still mogs Gigachad in terms of sexual desrability.
It is beyond over for the male race at this point, no wonder women don't give a fuck about most men, and why even attractive celebrities get trashed.
Since we know from other studies that looks are also the most important thing out ther for a woman form a male in terms of sexual desirability, this means:
NO MAN IS EVER GOOD ENOUGH FOR A WOMAN UNLESS HE IS A 10/10 Gigachad.
I think this settles the battle of who has it better, not only does Stacy mog Chad to oblivion, but even Femcels mog Chad to the shadow realm.