"Female proprietors held up to a third of the land and serfs in private hands in Russia before Emancipation."

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

A woman's kingdom: Women and the control of property in Russia, 1700-1861

Remember boyos that whamen were ohppressed in the past, in ways you can't even imagine and don't you ever dare to even slightly doubt it or look closer at what the past was like.

 

[Julius1]

''we dindu nuffin tehee''

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

women always tended to outlive their husbands, for various reasons, so they always had a route to property and power, even during 'times of oppression'

 

[glutty]

ok

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

''we dindu nuffin tehee''

Which is what pisses me off about it the most. The complete denial of women having had any agency historically is really only a stepping stone to the claim that women have never even been capable of doing anything bad in history. We already had American MSM shocked that white women were actively involved in buying black slaves, explaining it as one oppressed group attacking another (as if there was anything in common in the status of those two groups)

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/22/us/white-women-american-slave-trade.html

I reckon we are about five years or so away from somebody reinterpreting those Russian noblewomen owning all that land and serfs in that way as well, saying that it was just one "oppressed" group under "white male domination" attacking another to "gain back dignity and gain power" instead of just, y'know, nobles owning their family's property after inheriting it, either from their parents or spouses.

women always tended to outlive their husbands, for various reasons, so they always had a route to property and power, even during 'times of oppression'

That plus women not actually being as universally barred from inheritance as feminists claim they were.

 

[reveries]

Very interesting
Пацаны @Anarcho Nihilist @user

 

[Julius1]

Which is what pisses me off about it the most. The complete denial of women having had any agency historically is really only a stepping stone to the claim that women have never even been capable of doing anything bad in history.

Cucks think that women are less violent but in reality women are much more tyrannical and abusive if they're given chance, cruelty of men meanwhile are natural one and means to achieve a point, but women are natural sadists.

 

[Anarcho Nihilist]

A woman's kingdom: Women and the control of property in Russia, 1700-1861

Remember boyos that whamen were ohppressed in the past, in ways you can't even imagine and don't you ever dare to even slightly doubt it or look closer at what the past was like.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darya_Nikolayevna_Saltykova
If we're talking about serfdom in Russia, it's worth mentioning that the most sadistic landowner of all time was, who would have thought, a woman.
Some of the atrocities of Darya Nikolaevna Saltykova (Saltychikha):
The brutal beating of serfs for the slightest offense. The reason could be an inappropriate, in the opinion of the landowner, look, inappropriate tone or smile.
The torture of girls. Saltychikha could watch for a long time as the girl washed the floor, and then, if she found the slightest mistake, she would whip the servants with rods or beat them with a rolling pin, a log, or just with her fists.
Cauterization of the ears with hot forceps. In addition, the landowner tore out clumps of hair from peasant women with her bare hands.
Corral the girl into the pond. By order of Saltychikha, she had to stand up to her neck in water, it was November, and she died a few hours later.
The murder of the son of one of the serfs. The reason was the boy's too loud laughter. The enraged landowner killed the child with her own hands, threatening his parents with even more severe reprisals if they thought to write a complaint.
According to the official version, Saltychikha was involved in the deaths of 138 serfs, some of whom she personally killed, others were killed.

 

[Anarcho Nihilist]

Very interesting
Пацаны @Anarcho Nihilist @user

Thanks for mentioning that.

 

[reveries]

Thanks for mentioning that.

No problem brocel
I read your post above, very interesting, can't say I'm surprised though Foids are very cruel, whenever given the chance, giving them power is a very bad idea