Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Female incels existed 15k years ago in Siberia (anthropologist Peter Frost)

Adûnâi

Adûnâi

Veteran
★★★★
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Posts
1,315
> "We still need more data, but it seems that the current European phenotype arose during the last ice age, some 10 to 20 thousand years ago, among hunting people who inhabited the plains stretching from the Baltic to Siberia. Their women were subjected to strong sexual selection for two reasons. First, men were fewer in number. In a hunting society, male mortality increases as hunters cover longer distances, and average hunting distance is longest in open northern environments. Second, polygyny was less frequent. Since men provided almost all the food, the effort of providing for a second wife and her children was impossible for all but the best hunters. With few polygynous men, and fewer men altogether, women were in a tough market—too many competing for too few. Even slight improvements in attractiveness could make a big difference."
© Peter Frost

So, it's neither a chad-centric polyandry of today, nor a [White] Sharia state [of tomorrow]. It's... female incels! Science has found them!
 
Explains the slav pill tbh
 
Thats why we need only female imigrants into lands of white man
 
Better for men than this shit life, that's for sure. Either you get a cute foid, or you die in a hunting accident. Either way no decades of suffering. Also would be [LifeFuel] seeing fat ugly foids have to go without a partner.
 
I was going to say that men didn't have to provide for women but were still driven to impregnate as many as possible, and thus this argument is slightly invalidated (although I am not quick to dispute reliable scientific findings). But if this were the case, the women wouldn't have survived while pregnant either, leading to them and their offspring dying and none of their genes being passed on. So I suppose men had (in some particular circumstances) more power in the dating market than previously thought, not today though.
 
this is why the more fucked up the world is, the better. thermonuclear war when
 
JFL if anyone thinks that foids had it harder than men during any point of human existence.
 
no surprising at all
chad eradicated out looksmatches 15 thousand years ago. IT'S FUCKING OVER
 
Imagine a world like this. It’s utterly bizarre. Men probably punching 3-4 points above their PSL. Madness.
 
Also would be [LifeFuel] seeing fat ugly foids have to go without a partner.

Being fat 15k years ago, JFL.

Explains the slav pill tbh

Slavs have nothing to do with ancient Aryans.

chad eradicated out looksmatches 15 thousand years ago. IT'S FUCKING OVER

Looks didn't matter back then. Only resources. And it had also been before the agricultural revolution, that means zero chads.
 
Imagine a world like this. It’s utterly bizarre. Men probably punching 3-4 points above their PSL. Madness.
Miller1


Born too late for qt stacy waifu, born too early for voluptuous sex robot, born just in time to be miserable incel
 
This takes place in siberia, no?

1. Siberia was colonized by Russians starting in the 17th ct.

2. Aryans inhabited Kazakhstan 5k years ago.

Learn some history. It's literally Wikipedia. I'm not talking about muh' extraterrestrial ancestors.
 
1. Siberia was colonized by Russians starting in the 17th ct.

2. Aryans inhabited Kazakhstan 5k years ago.

Learn some history. It's literally Wikipedia. I'm not talking about muh' extraterrestrial ancestors.
lol @ telling me what to do. i don't give a shit about history.
 
> "We still need more data, but it seems that the current European phenotype arose during the last ice age, some 10 to 20 thousand years ago, among hunting people who inhabited the plains stretching from the Baltic to Siberia. Their women were subjected to strong sexual selection for two reasons. First, men were fewer in number. In a hunting society, male mortality increases as hunters cover longer distances, and average hunting distance is longest in open northern environments. Second, polygyny was less frequent. Since men provided almost all the food, the effort of providing for a second wife and her children was impossible for all but the best hunters. With few polygynous men, and fewer men altogether, women were in a tough market—too many competing for too few. Even slight improvements in attractiveness could make a big difference."
© Peter Frost

So, it's neither a chad-centric polyandry of today, nor a [White] Sharia state [of tomorrow]. It's... female incels! Science has found them!

We were born in the wrong age.

Imagine being a indo-european hunter of 7000 years ago who lives in the steppes through hunting big animals, has access to sex without limits and lives in harmony with nature
 
Too much emphasis on Siberia, lol. The phenotypes in Europeans don't have single common origin.
 
We were born in the wrong age.

Imagine being a indo-european hunter of 7000 years ago who lives in the steppes through hunting big animals, has access to sex without limits and lives in harmony with nature
Agriculture fucked everything up, we were too ambitious.
 
Better for men than this shit life, that's for sure. Either you get a cute foid, or you die in a hunting accident. Either way no decades of suffering. Also would be [LifeFuel] seeing fat ugly foids have to go without a partner.
tbh, we should just trash all this technology and go back to living in caves
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Replies
13
Views
1K
erenyeager
erenyeager
Kanga Kiwi Koala
Replies
12
Views
709
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
Shaktiman
Replies
28
Views
1K
rapetorturekill
rapetorturekill
Stupid Clown
Replies
8
Views
763
Poopless One
Poopless One

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top