When I was a small child I read a book called the "Desert flower" about a Somalian negress turned model that had her vajajjyaaaj circumcised at the age of 8-12. As a result of that she could never feel any pleasure so she could never enjoy sex.
That's fiction, female circumcision is simply the removal of the clitoral hood, which is the smaller female prepuce, exposing the glans of the clitoris directly to underwear chafe just like dick head.
Sometimes amputation of the clitoral glans gets mistakenly called circumcisions but that's basically low-IQ rambling.
Even if that was done though it can't prevent enjoying sex or experiencing pleasure because 90% of the clitoris is subdermal and is not amputated when the glans is.
It's like saying a guy couldn't orgasm just because his glans was cut off: sure he could, he could get handjobs/blowjobs on the base of the shaft and it would still work.
Penetration would be a problem if glans were amputated on a man but it doesn't interfere with penetration at all with foids if their glans is removed, except perhaps in making foreplay more difficult to arouse-prep them for penetration-orgasm.
I plan to re-read the book to have a good chuckle as I have forgotten a chunk of it's story but I still vividly remember the part where they cut her vag with a sharp piece of glass and the pain that followed when she tried to pee.
I find this confusing because the clitoris is above the urethra so I'm not sure why the urine would flow upward into the circumcision wound.
I guess that female circimcision could be done today just like male one as in my opinion is no more barbaric than what the American cucks are doing to their boys
Female circumcision is much less barbaric than male circumcision. They have much less prepuce (clitoral hood) and there isn't complicated stuff like ridged band or special mucousal shit that gets ripped off.
Since western women seem to love circumcised dick the same standard should apply to them for a true gender equality.
You can approach closer to gender equality but ultimately removnig all of a foid's prepuce and hymen and even going so far as her glans probably wouldn't be as bad as modern circumcision involving both mil'ah and pri'ah
Might've tied mil'ah when they snipped the ridged band but now they rip the entire thing down and rake it with Jew nails: foid suffering will never catch up
The fact that they would feel no pleasure down there is just a bonus.
Female circumcision prevents them to be whores
bad grammar, and no, exposing the clitoris glans does not interfere with sex or selling sex
Female circumcision is based. Some boys have been getting circumcised since they were just infants, so females getting circumcised at older ages to prevent them from whoring and turning into full blown sluts by preventing them from being stimulated is based, it should be more widely common.
it wouldn't do shit, they'd still have vaginal orgasms from Chad
female circumcision would be bad for mid-tier guys because they need the external clit glans to stimulate for foreplay prior to sex so the foid will want the sex
this foreplay is only lacking necessity fo rchad, she's pre-aroused for him so can have erect deep clit even if glans is removed
to find out who rules over you find out who you cannot criticise. If you cannot criticise the Figrew, you've found who rules over you.
by Figrew did you mean Jew?