The response is "Bro have you ever even talked to a woman before?"
Of course the answer is no.
Wat do?
Of course the answer is no.
Wat do?
RageFuel Every time I talk about the blackpill or women's behavior
I made a thread about this exact situation:
incels.is
They say you can't say those things because you never been with a woman.
If I tell someone not to put their hand on a hot stove or else they'll get burned, imagine these normies replying "how would you know, you never been burnt".
My point is you don't need "personal experience" with a woman to call out objective truths about women/female nature.
Personal Experience fallacy
This is something I've thought of but now decided to put it into writing. Over the years I've seen this phenomenon over and over again, but I don't know the name for it so I'll call it the "Personal Experience Fallacy". For example have you guys noticed that when you talk about female nature...
incels.is
They say you can't say those things because you never been with a woman.
If I tell someone not to put their hand on a hot stove or else they'll get burned, imagine these normies replying "how would you know, you never been burnt".
My point is you don't need "personal experience" with a woman to call out objective truths about women/female nature.
L
I think OP is larpI made a thread about this exact situation:
Personal Experience fallacy
This is something I've thought of but now decided to put it into writing. Over the years I've seen this phenomenon over and over again, but I don't know the name for it so I'll call it the "Personal Experience Fallacy". For example have you guys noticed that when you talk about female nature...
They say you can't say those things because you never been with a woman.
If I tell someone not to put their hand on a hot stove or else they'll get burned, imagine these normies replying "how would you know, you never been burnt".
My point is you don't need "personal experience" with a woman to call out objective truths about women/female nature.
To add to that, an example I like to use is if you come across a helicopter stuck in a tree, or upside down on the ground, you don't need to be a pilot to know that's not how you're supposed to land a helicopter.
An issue lies in the fact that different people face different experiences with women based on who they are. an attractive person might face completely different experiences than me. so your opinion on women does in fact somewhat depend on your personal interactions and not just what you read online.I made a thread about this exact situation:
Personal Experience fallacy
This is something I've thought of but now decided to put it into writing. Over the years I've seen this phenomenon over and over again, but I don't know the name for it so I'll call it the "Personal Experience Fallacy". For example have you guys noticed that when you talk about female nature...
They say you can't say those things because you never been with a woman.
If I tell someone not to put their hand on a hot stove or else they'll get burned, imagine these normies replying "how would you know, you never been burnt".
My point is you don't need "personal experience" with a woman to call out objective truths about women/female nature.
D
Just ignore them. They've already lost the argument by thinking with their emotions.
No point in discussing blackpill with those who aren't already woke tbh.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
