Women's idea of "empathy" is a joke

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

As we all know, women only have empathy for things they think look appealing. They have no empathy for things they think are ugly.

While your furry pet was out in the yard torturing innocent squirrels, innocent flies were trying to fuck and lay their eggs in shit in peace. Interestingly, flies are probably less filthy than your pet's tongue that you let inside your mouth on a regular basis.

Do women care about flies? Of course not. The most a flycel will ever get is a swat.

Women don't care what happens to flies.

Look at how most women treat spiders. Sure, spiders eat flies and other insects, but you would think that would make women big fans. Nope.

They think they're wonderful people for caring about cute, furry things, however.

It works the same with men, of course. Clavicular gets sympathy from women. He's a redeemable incel.

Nobody cares about blackops2cel, though. They'll even tell lies about him like saying that he's married. The last time anybody checked his social media, that was not true.

Incels have REAL empathy. We feel bad for the ugly and attack those normies think are deserving of empathy, such as women.

 

[VλREN]

I hate flies and spiders

 

[Animecel2D]

The empathy a woman has possesses an aesthetic quality, where judgments of "good" and "evil" are influenced by beauty, appearance, and sensory experience rather than purely rational principles

 

[fokusin]

As we all know, women only have empathy for things they think look appealing. They have no empathy for things they think are ugly.

While your furry pet was out in the yard torturing innocent squirrels, innocent flies were trying to fuck and lay their eggs in shit in peace. Interestingly, flies are probably less filthy than your pet's tongue that you let inside your mouth on a regular basis.

Do women care about flies? Of course not. The most a flycel will ever get is a swat.

Women don't care what happens to flies.

Look at how most women treat spiders. Sure, spiders eat flies and other insects, but you would think that would make women big fans. Nope.

They think they're wonderful people for caring about cute, furry things, however.

It works the same with men, of course. Clavicular gets sympathy from women. He's a redeemable incel.

Nobody cares about blackops2cel, though. They'll even tell lies about him like saying that he's married. The last time anybody checked his social media, that was not true.

Incels have REAL empathy. We feel bad for the ugly and attack those normies think are deserving of empathy, such as women.

selective empathy is not empathy

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

The kind of morality is more of normalfag thing than just a woman thing, As a society we spend millions of dollars on stopping panda's from going to extinct while letting other animals die off. Why? because we find pandas aesthetically appealing.

 

[sultryloser]

To be clear the concept of morality is aesthetics for most instances of consciousness out there. It's not just a woman thing. You've had to have blackpilled thoughts to rebel against the instinctual, aesthetic rendition of morality. The most mature view of morality is consciousness and the amount of self-awareness, likewise I empathize the most with who expresses the intricate thoughts that I believe that I do. I can't pity a spider or an ant, because they're not so conscious or self-aware.

When you speak to someone for a while, you can sense if you match consciousnesses.

 

[soft]

Women would empathetically genocide all incels if they could

 

[tired as fuck]

Empathy does not exist, incels are not empathetic

 

[parbate2025]

As we all know, women only have empathy for things they think look appealing. They have no empathy for things they think are ugly.

While your furry pet was out in the yard torturing innocent squirrels, innocent flies were trying to fuck and lay their eggs in shit in peace. Interestingly, flies are probably less filthy than your pet's tongue that you let inside your mouth on a regular basis.

Do women care about flies? Of course not. The most a flycel will ever get is a swat.

Women don't care what happens to flies.

Look at how most women treat spiders. Sure, spiders eat flies and other insects, but you would think that would make women big fans. Nope.

They think they're wonderful people for caring about cute, furry things, however.

It works the same with men, of course. Clavicular gets sympathy from women. He's a redeemable incel.

Nobody cares about blackops2cel, though. They'll even tell lies about him like saying that he's married. The last time anybody checked his social media, that was not true.

Incels have REAL empathy. We feel bad for the ugly and attack those normies think are deserving of empathy, such as women.

ER is used as face of incelim because he is somewhat handsome.
They will never use real truecel face for incels.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Empathy does not exist, incels are not empathetic

tf u talkibng bout

 

[tired as fuck]

tf u talkibng bout

cba to explain I'm sleep deprived

 

[Freixel]

Women have no soul, so they don't feel empathy

 

[PolnischeKartoffel]

The empathy a woman has possesses an aesthetic quality, where judgments of "good" and "evil" are influenced by beauty, appearance, and sensory experience rather than purely rational principles

Truth

They aren't able to make objective (like rationale and existing principles) judgments and always have to make "exceptions"

 

[Lookslikeit]

Women don't care what happens to flies.

Now imagine what they think of foxes. A fox is one of the WORST, most COWARDLY animals that EVER was.

A fox would steal an unwatched human baby from a porch and rip it to pieces in the WORST way possible, bfre even STARTING TO EAT IT, without even flinching, oh wait... THEY ARE KNOWN FOR DOING EXACTLY THAT FFS...

But go to tumblr or twitter and you'll countless posts of bitches GLAZING THAT FITLHY ANIMAL TO DEATH.

 

[DjentlemanDuke]

they're a bunch of hypocrites, they don't care about the ugly incels

 

[Grodd]

selective empathy is not empathy

 

[Jack-The-Ripper]

a flycel

 

[GloriousMisanthrope]

Now imagine what they think of foxes. A fox is one of the WORST, most COWARDLY animals that EVER was.

A fox would steal an unwatched human baby from a porch and rip it to pieces in the WORST way possible, bfre even STARTING TO EAT IT, without even flinching, oh wait... THEY ARE KNOWN FOR DOING EXACTLY THAT FFS...

But go to tumblr or twitter and you'll countless posts of bitches GLAZING THAT FITLHY ANIMAL TO DEATH.

Nietzsche was right about everything on this matter. Beauty is the only universal moral standard.

“If you kill a cockroach you are a hero; if you kill a butterfly you are bad. Morality has aesthetic standards.”

 

[fatass30000]

The kind of morality is more of normalfag thing than just a woman thing

yea most people in general have selective empathy. I remember telling a person irl that their friend wasn’t a good person if they’re only good to certain people and a piece of shit to everybody else.

 

[caineturbat2003]

Look at how most women treat spiders. Sure, spiders eat flies and other insects, but you would think that would make women big fans. Nope.

Tbh, spiders are unpredictable fucks that would enjoy to have a bite of your hand if they could. And don't give me that "but they fear us bro", I literally had a spider retard climbing down with his web up his ass right next to me. Can you imagine how retarded that spider was? They act like niggers.

 

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

Tbh, spiders are unpredictable fucks that would enjoy to have a bite of your hand if they could. And don't give me that "but they fear us bro", I literally had a spider retard climbing down with his web up his ass right next to me. Can you imagine how retarded that spider was? They act like niggers.

Yeah, I'm cool with spiders when they stay in the corner of a room. When they start approaching, I treat them like women treat sub-Chads who approach them.

 

[caineturbat2003]

Flies, however, leave you in peace and are not agressive fucks biting you.

 

[caineturbat2003]

Yeah, I'm cool with spiders when they stay in the corner of a room. When they start approaching, I treat them like women treat sub-Chads who approach them.

Dude, I would treat spiders the same sentiment you have if they respected their borders. I wouldn't give a fuck if he was in the corner as long as he doesn't invade my space. Like I said, spiders are basically 8 legged niggers.

 

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

Dude, I would treat spiders the same sentiment you have if they respected their borders. I wouldn't give a fuck if he was in the corner as long as he doesn't invade my space. Like I said, spiders are basically 8 legged niggers.

The thing to note is I still have felt bad killing spiders and flies. Women don't care.

 

[cymbeline]

spiders are basically 8 legged niggers

 

[caineturbat2003]

The thing to note is I still have felt bad killing spiders and flies. Women don't care.

Spiders are agressive, I wouldn't feel a thing. Flies however I don't even care about their existence, not even they are on me. I don't even remember killing one. Maybe once when I was a kid, but I was really testing if the tool could actually catch the fly than actually doing it out of pure malice.

 

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

Spiders are agressive, I wouldn't feel a thing. Flies however I don't even care about their existence, not even they are on me. I don't even remember killing one. Maybe once when I was a kid, but I was really testing if the tool could actually catch the fly than actually doing it out of pure malice.

The thing is, they're nowhere near as bad as IncelTear users.

 

[Balding Subhuman]

People with neotenous features are more likely to get empathy from people, men have far less neotenous features than women, so its not a surprise that people have massive lack of empathy towards men. After all, most people act like preprogrammed robots and just go with their instincts. Of course this will never be admitted by feminists or women in general.

 

[kip7]

I have disposed the idea of needing empathy from women. And modern womens empathy aint worth shit. I can take gratitude from women.

 

[chihiro]

tfd

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Clavicular gets sympathy from women. He's a redeemable incel.

nigger what

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

cba to explain I'm sleep deprived

that won't cut it here greycuck

 

[stsaturn]

The empathy a woman has possesses an aesthetic quality, where judgments of "good" and "evil" are influenced by beauty, appearance, and sensory experience rather than purely rational principles

Women would empathetically genocide all incels if they could

 

[retardfuel30]

If women had any empathy they would let me slide my big fat incel cock inside their holes

 

[tired as fuck]

that won't cut it here greycuck

Sure, allow me to explain myself then. Be aware that this is just my view of things and I don't hold any claim on the absolute truth of it.

Basically, I think that humans are fundamentally isolated and are unable to break out and form connections with each other, because the human experience is limited by perception. I'm not a solipsist I think, I assume that other conscious beings exist outside of my perception, but since this is unprovable, it's merely an operational axiom, a sort of ontological "leap of faith".

That said, we may never truly see each other's innermost self, which we hide from public eye and only manifest in solitude, some parts of it consciously, others without us noticing. The society we have built enforces itself through shame: anyone who differs from a purported "normal", a statistical average, is shamed and coerced into becoming one. But people don't become average, rather they mask their self in order to rejoin society; it's a conscious event in eastern, collectivist (a better term eludes my mind at the moment) societies like China and Japan, it's subconscious and passively accepted in western societies.

Besides the societal evaluation, on an individual level I do think that, as a result of this, we only know through two means: logically deduced propositions (which follow precise inference laws), and 1st person experience. Yes, the consequence of this is that information obtained and relayed by others is not a form of knowledge, I am aware. I do not know yet if I am ready to accept this and state that any field that doesn't strictly move through logic (so any field unlike mathematics) is based on the explicit acceptance of others' information and implicit faith that they hold true, but I do think that many things supposed true for many centuries in reality are not, in fact, true. From the point of view of Galileo, for instance, he could've accepted Ptolemy's view of the Solar System as knowledge, but through his first person investigations he found out the his geocentric model was bogus, and later it was proved through logic, such that it effectively became knowledge. The rest was a hypothesis that wasn't verified but politically convenient for the Church. Many such cases happen today, too, of accepted truths that aren't proven.

Given such premises then, I truly think that a concept such as "empathy" is not felt by humans, because how could I know the pain you are feeling, if I have no access to it? I could try to imagine what that might be like, but I cannot succeed. I can't imagine how painful it might be to see your son die before you, for example, or I can't comprehend the pain of childbirth, because I never experienced those things, and even if I did, different individuals experience pain in vastly different ways (some laugh for instance). Emotions are strictly inaccessible in my opinion, thus at most I can sympathize with a person who goes through something I went through, but there's that, it's weaker than empathy. A lot of people talk about suicidal empathy but to me, that's just the same as what others consider "normal" empathy.

To conclude, many other concepts lose meaning in my eyes, like love, friendship and faith.

As I said, this is just what I think currently, my view is always subject to changes and evolutions. If it is stupid then whatever, if it's illogical then corrections are due.

 

[Izayacel]

Spiders are agressive, I wouldn't feel a thing. Flies however I don't even care about their existence, not even they are on me. I don't even remember killing one. Maybe once when I was a kid, but I was really testing if the tool could actually catch the fly than actually doing it out of pure malice.

Flies have hyper reaction and 360 Grad " vision , they can see whats behind their head , kek .

 

[DjentlemanDuke]

Nietzsche was right about everything on this matter. Beauty is the only universal moral standard.

“If you kill a cockroach you are a hero; if you kill a butterfly you are bad. Morality has aesthetic standards.”

 

[rcnfive]

of all the examples of foids having no sympathy you pick flies?

fuck flies, i’ll swat every one i see

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Sure, allow me to explain myself then. Be aware that this is just my view of things and I don't hold any claim on the absolute truth of it.

Basically, I think that humans are fundamentally isolated and are unable to break out and form connections with each other, because the human experience is limited by perception. I'm not a solipsist I think, I assume that other conscious beings exist outside of my perception, but since this is unprovable, it's merely an operational axiom, a sort of ontological "leap of faith".

That said, we may never truly see each other's innermost self, which we hide from public eye and only manifest in solitude, some parts of it consciously, others without us noticing. The society we have built enforces itself through shame: anyone who differs from a purported "normal", a statistical average, is shamed and coerced into becoming one. But people don't become average, rather they mask their self in order to rejoin society; it's a conscious event in eastern, collectivist (a better term eludes my mind at the moment) societies like China and Japan, it's subconscious and passively accepted in western societies.

Besides the societal evaluation, on an individual level I do think that, as a result of this, we only know through two means: logically deduced propositions (which follow precise inference laws), and 1st person experience. Yes, the consequence of this is that information obtained and relayed by others is not a form of knowledge, I am aware. I do not know yet if I am ready to accept this and state that any field that doesn't strictly move through logic (so any field unlike mathematics) is based on the explicit acceptance of others' information and implicit faith that they hold true, but I do think that many things supposed true for many centuries in reality are not, in fact, true. From the point of view of Galileo, for instance, he could've accepted Ptolemy's view of the Solar System as knowledge, but through his first person investigations he found out the his geocentric model was bogus, and later it was proved through logic, such that it effectively became knowledge. The rest was a hypothesis that wasn't verified but politically convenient for the Church. Many such cases happen today, too, of accepted truths that aren't proven.

Given such premises then, I truly think that a concept such as "empathy" is not felt by humans, because how could I know the pain you are feeling, if I have no access to it? I could try to imagine what that might be like, but I cannot succeed. I can't imagine how painful it might be to see your son die before you, for example, or I can't comprehend the pain of childbirth, because I never experienced those things, and even if I did, different individuals experience pain in vastly different ways (some laugh for instance). Emotions are strictly inaccessible in my opinion, thus at most I can sympathize with a person who goes through something I went through, but there's that, it's weaker than empathy. A lot of people talk about suicidal empathy but to me, that's just the same as what others consider "normal" empathy.

To conclude, many other concepts lose meaning in my eyes, like love, friendship and faith.

As I said, this is just what I think currently, my view is always subject to changes and evolutions. If it is stupid then whatever, if it's illogical then corrections are due.

my nigga you're overthinking it instead of philosophical turbo autism, you'd do well to embrace some facets of evolutionary psychology. empathy is just an adaptation of high trust, high IQ social animals like yt to increase social cohesion and minimize negative events through collective aid it doesn't mean you have to "truly see each other's innermost self" jfl

 

[tired as fuck]

my nigga you're overthinking it instead of philosophical turbo autism, you'd do well to embrace some facets of evolutionary psychology. empathy is just an adaptation of high trust, high IQ social animals like yt to increase social cohesion and minimize negative events through collective aid it doesn't mean you have to "truly see each other's innermost self" jfl

Evolutionary psychology is a bunch of fairy tales mate, a way to subdue the capacity for thought and reflection through society-supporting drivel.

 

[jorkinitatwork]

women have empathy for abstarct things bc their phone and news (jews) told them too. they shouldnt be able to see a distorted world from a screen

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Evolutionary psychology is a bunch of fairy tales mate, a way to subdue the capacity for thought and reflection through society-supporting drivel.

any attempt to support that schizo statement or you just want the koala avi?

 

[tired as fuck]

any attempt to support that schizo statement or you just want the koala avi?

"Schizo statement" he says, categorizing a normal logical proposition. Nothing about evolutionary psychology is provable, hence it's just drivel, in the realm of faith, much like psychology, psychiatry, and any other so called social """sciences""". A good fairy tale you can tell yourself so that you don't have to face the unknown, but that's it. Go ahead and post the koala avi though, I'm sure that will do wonders.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

"Schizo statement" he says, categorizing a normal logical proposition. Nothing about evolutionary psychology is provable, hence it's just drivel, in the realm of faith, much like psychology, psychiatry, and any other so called social """sciences""". A good fairy tale you can tell yourself so that you don't have to face the unknown, but that's it. Go ahead and post the koala avi though, I'm sure that will do wonders.

again greyshit, this won't cut it here you can think yourself very smart but that won't change the fact that you're just a schizo retard fresh out of high school evolutionary psychology offers great insight into the behavior of animals and is a cornerstone of is discourse, you dismissing it outright doesn't make you better, it makes you a fucking idiot that rather jerks himself off over schizo takes than learn a thing or two about whatever he's badmouthing

 

[tired as fuck]

again greyshit, this won't cut it here you can think yourself very smart but that won't change the fact that you're just a schizo retard fresh out of high school evolutionary psychology offers great insight into the behavior of animals and is a cornerstone of is discourse, you dismissing it outright doesn't make you better, it makes you a fucking idiot that rather jerks himself off over schizo takes than learn a thing or two about whatever he's badmouthing

You can use as many insults as you like, you're not exhibiting particular intellect nor competency in what we're discussing right now. I couldn't care less if evolutionary psychology is the cornerstone of .is discourse, that just invalidates all the talk because evolutionary psychology has a flimsy base and no epistemological validity. You really thought some random appeal to authority (as if a forum could be an authority) could work?

As I said, my opinions are my opinions and I don't try to sell them as absolute truth, so I don't know what you're talking about with the "jerks himself over", perhaps you're put off by the manner in which I write, but it shouldn't be an issue. Voicing an opinion different from yours isn't an indicator of arrogance, nor arguing over the validity of the so called """science""" upon which you base your ideas. See, here's the thing: I never even implied that my assumptions are based on anything scientific. They're merely observations; however, I do try to apply logic when deriving inferences and when using induction. I haven't seen you arguing over the logical validity of any step, nor have I seen you argue the validity (by whatever metric) of the starting assumptions. So all that's left is for me to assume you are just looking for an excuse to call me names and make yourself feel important because you adhere to a """science""" which can make no meaningful statements backed up by anything that isn't purely conjectural and never proven (because by its very structure and definition cannot be proven), fooling yourself by thinking you think while you're just a sheep in the herd, and putting those that try to actually think for themselves down with your ill-concealed ignorance. But I am sure you stopped reading midway through.

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

Women would empathetically genocide all incels if they could

facts

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

"Schizo statement" he says, categorizing a normal logical proposition. Nothing about evolutionary psychology is provable, hence it's just drivel, in the realm of faith, much like psychology, psychiatry, and any other so called social """sciences""". A good fairy tale you can tell yourself so that you don't have to face the unknown, but that's it. Go ahead and post the koala avi though, I'm sure that will do wonders.

well he worships Mr smallcock choppedforeskin Rapestein... . what did you expect... ?

 

[Lo3e]

glow bait but trvth

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

If women had any empathy they would let me slide my big fat incel cock inside their holes

they have more empathy about her phone or cafe late than about your incel cock or you... .

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

You can use as many insults as you like, you're not exhibiting particular intellect nor competency in what we're discussing right now. I couldn't care less if evolutionary psychology is the cornerstone of .is discourse, that just invalidates all the talk because evolutionary psychology has a flimsy base and no epistemological validity.

lil bitchass nigga you ain't the first one to come up with objections regarding softer sciences than math but guess what, that's all settled and we can in fact draw useful conclusions. I am in fact responding to your bullshit but you're too fucking dumb to realize it the only reason you can write such bullshit regarding evolutionary psychology is because you didn't even bother to read a single fucking thread on this site before spewing your greycuck tales
here, a good one for you to start off

Simping, Male on Male Aggression & Mating Cues

"Another rapid social-context effect shows men in some of their lamest moments. Specifically, when women are present, or when men are prompted to think about women, they become more risk-taking, show steeper temporal discounting in economic decisions, and spend more on luxury items (but not on...

incels.is

You really thought some random appeal to authority (as if a forum could be an authority) could work?

I'm not appealing to authority, I'm telling you that people who aren't 1 month old greyfags have debated these topics for many years before you decided to show your greycuck opinions here so you should respect that. but you won't, since you're a fucking zoomer teenage tiktok normalfag who accidentally made it here one day

I do try to apply logic when deriving inferences and when using induction

no, what you're doing is binning entire domains of knowledge so you wouldn't have to deal with them. I also made this mistake when I was around your age so I won't hold it over you, however you must understand, you have much to learn

isn't purely conjectural and never proven (because by its very structure and definition cannot be proven)

retarded, clueless take. many statements of evolutionary psychology are as good as proven and your schizo rambling won't change any of that I understand you're a grey but you simply can not bin EVERY field of science besides math and expect to not be treated as a retard

fooling yourself by thinking you think while you're just a sheep in the herd, and putting those that try to actually think for themselves down with your ill-concealed ignorance

muh sheep ur so smart bro and totally not a tiktokfag high on schizo tales

I'll humor you for a bit though. if you wanted to actually think for yourself and not just jerk yourself off over your supposed enlightenment on the internet, what you'd do is read, read and read from many different sources and eventually arrive at a body of knowledge and conclusion that is your own. and in many aspects that's significantly more valuable than nerding out on math, which is while objective, is also more rigid and perhaps less open to further development and insight. but you're too lazy for that, in good 18 year old fashion, you just want to look cool in fact, you're the worst kind of dipshit, arguing over and making a big fuss out of fucking trivialities

"Schizo statement" he says, categorizing a normal logical proposition

I did give you a chance to explain yourself, maybe you should've taken it