Cucktears argument.
P1: Wamen only respond negatively or are creeped out when men are creepy or disgusting.
P2: Wamen bullied you, made fun of you and rejected you.
C1: Therefore it was because you were creepy and disgusting so you deserved it!
when argument is rebutted.
The just-world fallacy, or just-world hypothesis, is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" – that actions will necessarily have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor.
And in this instance this argument relies on the notion of the bluepill being true. which if it were then rira or any other dark triad chad would be incels by principles of the bluepill.
"Wamen bullied you for being ugly? well this story must be fake, no TRUE WAMEN could ever do such a thing."
No true scotsman fallacy: The "No True Scotsman" fallacy, also known as the appeal to purity, arises when an individual makes a universal claim about a group and, upon encountering a counterexample, redefines the criteria for membership in that group to exclude the counterexample.
The personal incredulity fallacy occurs when an individual concludes that a proposition must be false simply because they cannot comprehend how it could be true.
"I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT WAMEN WOULD EVER DO SUCH A THING, YOU MUST BE LYING BECAUSE I FIND THIS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE."
The personal incredulity fallacy occurs when an individual concludes that a proposition must be false simply because they cannot comprehend how it could be true. This fallacy is often expressed in statements like, "I can't imagine how that could happen, so it must not be true
"WELL YOU'RE MISOGYNISTIC SO I'M NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY."
A faulty appeal to blame often refers to logical fallacies that divert attention from the actual issue by attacking someone's character or motives rather than addressing the argument at hand.
"WE? DEPRAVED OF VAGINA? YOU'RE INSINUATING THAT WE SHOULD RAPE PEOPLE? FILTHY INKWELL."
Strawman fallacy.
More fallacies for example.
invincible ignorance fallacy: "Dismisses every point made, and refuses to give any counter examples."
"I think this statistical graph is too small, so let me refute with a anecdote that i'll then go onto argue for a majority."
Anecdotal fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy.
"Well this actor/celebrity ascended so why can't you?."
Survivorship bias is a cognitive bias where one focuses only on the successful examples of a group, while overlooking the failures. This leads to a skewed perception of reality, as the data set is incomplete.
Which would explain these shitty fallacious arguments from redditors.
"Insulting someone's character rather then the argument at hand."
Ad hominem.
I could list more if I wanted to but the list would be extremely fucking long
P1: Wamen only respond negatively or are creeped out when men are creepy or disgusting.
P2: Wamen bullied you, made fun of you and rejected you.
C1: Therefore it was because you were creepy and disgusting so you deserved it!
when argument is rebutted.
The just-world fallacy, or just-world hypothesis, is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" – that actions will necessarily have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor.
And in this instance this argument relies on the notion of the bluepill being true. which if it were then rira or any other dark triad chad would be incels by principles of the bluepill.
"Wamen bullied you for being ugly? well this story must be fake, no TRUE WAMEN could ever do such a thing."
No true scotsman fallacy: The "No True Scotsman" fallacy, also known as the appeal to purity, arises when an individual makes a universal claim about a group and, upon encountering a counterexample, redefines the criteria for membership in that group to exclude the counterexample.
The personal incredulity fallacy occurs when an individual concludes that a proposition must be false simply because they cannot comprehend how it could be true.
"I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT WAMEN WOULD EVER DO SUCH A THING, YOU MUST BE LYING BECAUSE I FIND THIS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE."
The personal incredulity fallacy occurs when an individual concludes that a proposition must be false simply because they cannot comprehend how it could be true. This fallacy is often expressed in statements like, "I can't imagine how that could happen, so it must not be true
"WELL YOU'RE MISOGYNISTIC SO I'M NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY."
A faulty appeal to blame often refers to logical fallacies that divert attention from the actual issue by attacking someone's character or motives rather than addressing the argument at hand.
"WE? DEPRAVED OF VAGINA? YOU'RE INSINUATING THAT WE SHOULD RAPE PEOPLE? FILTHY INKWELL."
Strawman fallacy.
More fallacies for example.
invincible ignorance fallacy: "Dismisses every point made, and refuses to give any counter examples."
"I think this statistical graph is too small, so let me refute with a anecdote that i'll then go onto argue for a majority."
Anecdotal fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy.
"Well this actor/celebrity ascended so why can't you?."
Survivorship bias is a cognitive bias where one focuses only on the successful examples of a group, while overlooking the failures. This leads to a skewed perception of reality, as the data set is incomplete.
Which would explain these shitty fallacious arguments from redditors.
"Insulting someone's character rather then the argument at hand."
Ad hominem.
I could list more if I wanted to but the list would be extremely fucking long
Last edited:
