MonkeyInaT34
Grand Rapist of The Cunny Union
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2024
- Posts
- 23,892
- Online time
- 14h 49m
Argument from incredulity/Divine fallacy is a fallacy in informal logic where someone concludes a claim or statement is false because it contradicts their own personal experiences and beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
3) It has not happened to me; therefore, it cannot happen to you
I decided to make a short thread about this because I haven't seen anyone mention it yet, this is arguably one of the most common fallacies.
I do not have the energy to expand this thread further, if someone else is willing to do it feel free to do so. My source is Wikipedia.
It also takes another form, and what I believe is one of the most common:Arguments from incredulity can take the form:
1) I cannot imagine how P could be true; therefore P must be false.
2)I cannot imagine how P could be false; therefore P must be true.
3) It has not happened to me; therefore, it cannot happen to you
From my understanding, it stems from the inability to think consciously, logically, or realistically.Arguments from incredulity can sometimes arise from inappropriate emotional involvement, the conflation of fantasy and reality, a lack of understanding, or an instinctive 'gut' reaction, especially where time is scarce.
I decided to make a short thread about this because I haven't seen anyone mention it yet, this is arguably one of the most common fallacies.
I do not have the energy to expand this thread further, if someone else is willing to do it feel free to do so. My source is Wikipedia.





