Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based Ever wonder why foids call their lovers "daddy"?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 38748
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 38748

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Posts
451
100% - Permaban - Sexualization of Minors
It's because women are meant to be raised by their husbands, in a father/daughter like relationship. This is how normal pair bonding works, as it allows to man to have easier control over her mind and "groom" her better. This is why it is called a bride and "groom", because grooming is actually a good thing. Women are meant to be controlled by men, and for their minds to be played like a fiddle in order to suit the man's needs.

People who argue against grown men grooming little girls are brainwashed NPCs who are whiteknighting for their ability to become Chad's sluts. They think women and men are equal and that a relationship should be based on equality, not based on a man having authority over a woman. They are spinless cucks who deserve to be incel as they support the system that prevents their escape.
 
lol ik imma see this on IT :feelskek:


true though
 
Nigga got permabanned. Brutal
 
brutal groomerpill
 
Dang, a permaban for this?
State of .Co :feelskek:
tbh


@METALMILITA88 @subzero @LOLI BREEDING [UWSL]@Zensfy[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Wizard32[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Coargutio[/UWSL] [UWSL]@turbocuckcel_7000 @happiless[/UWSL] thoughts on this thread?
 
Dang, a permaban for this?

tbh


@METALMILITA88 @subzero @LOLI BREEDING [UWSL]@Zensfy[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Wizard32[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Coargutio[/UWSL] [UWSL]@turbocuckcel_7000 @happiless[/UWSL] thoughts on this thread?
another Mengelecel alt got obliterated
 
Dang, a permaban for this?

tbh


@METALMILITA88 @subzero @LOLI BREEDING [UWSL]@Zensfy[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Wizard32[/UWSL] [UWSL]@Coargutio[/UWSL] [UWSL]@turbocuckcel_7000 @happiless[/UWSL] thoughts on this thread?
Completely wrongful ban. I didn’t see any rules broken. It’s probably because he’s gray they tend to get moderated harder :lul:
 
Mengelecel? who is that?
He’s the guy that made the big thread called “as an incel there’s literally no reason to be against pedophilia”.
 
Threads like these attract all the pedos like flies to shit.

Please feel free to share your thoughts. :feelsLSD:
I feel like you're itching to permaban me.

Sorry bro, you'll have to settle for permabanning OP. I will be a good goy today.
Completely wrongful ban. I didn’t see any rules broken. It’s probably because he’s gray they tend to get moderated harder :lul:
I think it had more to do with the fact it had to do with minors.
 
[UWSL]I think it had more to do with the fact it had to do with minors.[/UWSL]
Yeah they want to get rid of anti-agecucks but I feel like if I had made this thread there would have been no permaban
 
Yeah they want to get rid of anti-agecucks but I feel like if I had made this thread there would have been no permaban
It would probably take a fuck ton to ban someone with 10K+ posts
 
40%
Free this innocent man!

He spoke the truth!
 
I don't think you have been warned over this issue, so you would probably just get a talking to. Silverberry on the other hand has had multiple talks and warnings about pedoposting. This has been a long time coming for him. He can't help himself.
Would @METALMILITA88 be given a warning though if he made this? I get the vibe he would have.
 
Would @METALMILITA88 be given a warning though if he made this? I get the vibe he would have.
Maybe but the Nostradamus IQ post I made was before this new rule went into effect.
 
Based men groom a women to be his bride not any mens.
 
Last edited:
Elon Musk needs to save incels.co
 
i want to crush the skulls of pedo rockspiders
 
Mengelecel? who is that?
He’s the guy that made the big thread called “as an incel there’s literally no reason to be against pedophilia”.
You forgot about the part where he and his buddies did a false flag psyop, fabricating fake posts to get the anti-pedo graycel Nekopan banned, which temporarily succeeded before he retardedly confessed, leading to the mods reversing course and banning him and his pro pedo buddies

God that was a crazy shitshow to watch unfold :feelsohh: newcels missed out.
 
Nigga got permabanned. Brutal
Which mod is going to own up to doing this?

SilverBerry

It is not against the rules to sexualize "minors", only "prepubescent minors". It is not clear that @Silverberry necessarily meant prepubescent minors when he talked about raising your wife like a daughter and grooming her, he could be talking about grooming/raising mid-pubescent minors.

Furthermore, the term groom/raise does not imply sexualization - you can have an asexual relationship with a wife and just focus on building a household together. In fact you would be preventing her from being prematurely sexualized by chad because she's under the guardianship of a man who loves her and wants to wait until she is ready to bear children before putting cock into her prematurely.

The case of Eunice Winstead of a great example of that - she made the news getting married @ 9 years old but didn't have her first kid until 15 so her husband didn't fuck her for half a decade and just protected her and taught her to farm the land.

Threads like these attract all the pedos like flies to shit.
Please feel free to share your thoughts. :feelsLSD:
Pedophiles are attracted to young boys, we are talking about protecting young girls here, that's korephilia to parthenophilia depending on how young OP meant, which is unclear.

Either way, it's okay to have a sexual attraction to your growing wife just so long as you emulate the responsible behavior of Charlie Johns and wait half a decade until puberty has made her biologically able to safely carry children before doing sexual.

I don't think you have been warned over this issue, so you would probably just get a talking to. Silverberry on the other hand has had multiple talks and warnings about pedoposting. This has been a long time coming for him. He can't help himself.
The language he used in this thread said nothing about having sex with prepubescent girls, so he did not violate the rule against sexualizing prepubescent minors.

Also since 'pedoposting' would be sexualizing prepubescent boys, you should call sexualizing prepubescent girls "koreposting" instead.

It sounds to me like he is exploring the idea of a man having a non-sexual living arrangement with a young girl (unclear if he means pre-pubescent or mid-pubescent) to keep her safe from losing her virginity to chad, an waiting until she is 20 before impregnating her with babies.

In the meantime she could be mastering skills like growing carrots and weaving.

You should unban this guy unless he's explicitly saying to jam dicks into prepubescent girls or something which is obviously bad news that will make them poop out of their vagoos.
 
Silverberry is going to stay banned. The Moderation Team will not consider this matter any further.
 
Silverberry is going to stay banned. The Moderation Team will not consider this matter any further.
#1 agecuck has spoken. :feelsclown:
 
Silverberry is going to stay banned. The Moderation Team will not consider this matter any further.
Isn't this closeminded? You're basically saying "fuck off with the protests, we are a tyranny"

This doesn't seem just.
 
1652498022800


@CCPcel is this not an appeal to definition fallacy?

he is using a single source, and penalizing a user on that source.

so why is it okay for you to make appeals to colloquial defintions?
 
Isn't this closeminded? You're basically saying "fuck off with the protests, we are a tyranny"

This doesn't seem just.
No, it means we're going to apply the letter of the rules, so to speak, and we're not going to let anyone's whining hijack our decision-making process. A decision has already been made.

We have repeatedly made clear that sexualization of minors is not allowed, and this includes MAP language and advocacy.
 
No, it means we're going to apply the letter of the rules, so to speak, and we're not going to let anyone's whining hijack our decision-making process. A decision has already been made.

We have repeatedly made clear that sexualization of minors is not allowed, and this includes MAP language and advocacy.
you have repeatedly made clear sexualiztion of pre-pubesecents is not allowed, not minors.
 
This is why it is called a bride and "groom", because grooming is actually a good thing.
idk why but this shit made me laugh so hard.

good IT bait but sad you got banned for it.
 
Cut it any way you want, our rules are extremely clear.
they aren't though. and you know this

you banned OP when he said nothing about prepubescents,
 
The mental gymnastics nibbas go through to say a little girl is not actually a little girl.
little girl can be a 13 year old. they aren't prepubescent

the fact is this. you are trying to appeal to the public, and talk about adult men exterting mental force over female minors in not a good look for this forum, so you try and limit it

that is censorship at its full extent. and you know it
 
little girl can be a 13 year old. they aren't prepubescent

the fact is this. you are trying to appeal to the public, and talk about adult men exterting mental force over female minors in not a good look for this forum, so you try and limit it

that is censorship at its full extent. and you know it
The idea that we are trying to "appeal to the public" is a filthy dog-whistle that seems to portray pedophilia as just another based and contrarian extension of the blackpill. It is not and MAP ideology has nothing to do with the blackpill. W[UWSL]e've made it clear time and time again that we're simply not going to allow pedophiles to subvert incel communities for their own purposes. We know from experience that if they aren't suppressed, they will spread like a cancer. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]Damn right we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to little girls, just as we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to men. [/UWSL]
 
Such a power tripping fag if he ever became a politician he would be like pol pot.
these niggas be like "I can't talk about how much I want to jack off to little kids it's literally an Orwellian dictatorship!" :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
The idea that we are trying to "appeal to the public" is a filthy dog-whistle that seems to portray pedophilia as just another based and contrarian extension of the blackpill. It is not and MAP ideology has nothing to do with the blackpill. W[UWSL]e've made it clear time and time again that we're simply not going to allow pedophiles to subvert incel communities for their own purposes. We know from experience that if they aren't suppressed, they will spread like a cancer. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]Damn right we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to little girls, just as we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to men.[/UWSL]
Paying for pussy isn't blackpill either. :feelsthink:
 
The idea that we are trying to "appeal to the public" is a filthy dog-whistle that seems to portray pedophilia as just another based and contrarian extension of the blackpill. It is not and MAP ideology has nothing to do with the blackpill. W[UWSL]e've made it clear time and time again that we're simply not going to allow pedophiles to subvert incel communities for their own purposes. We know from experience that if they aren't suppressed, they will spread like a cancer. [/UWSL]
Massive cope the constant 'IT bait' messages are proof of this. This site is under scrutiny, and forced to be scared of public image.
[UWSL]Damn right we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to little girls, just as we're going to censor faggots who are attracted to men. [/UWSL]
being attracted to 12 year old girls is more normal than baing attracted to 30 year old men (if you are a man)

@Edmund_Kemper can conrim this
 
Yes. We are censoring pedophiles. In the same way that we censor gays, trannies, and women. If this forum is to remain an incel forum in character and purpose all subversive elements must be removed, else we guarantee gentrification. For too long pedophiles were allowed free reign on this site. Quickly you were able to monopolize all discourse to the point that you were able to turn a legitimate word like "age cuck" into a code word for pedophilia. This will happen no more.

So this is a warning to all the nonces. If you're a pedophile (korephile w/e) you are not welcome here. This is not a platform for you to spread your nonce bullshit. If you draw the gaze of my eye to your bullshit I will ban you. And no one will give a shit. This is a forum made by incels for incels. No more pedophiles.
And here we have #1 asslicker. :feelsclown:
 
Yes. We are censoring pedophiles. In the same way that we censor gays, trannies, and women. If this forum is to remain an incel forum in character and purpose all subversive elements must be removed, else we guarantee gentrification. For too long pedophiles were allowed free reign on this site. Quickly you were able to monopolize all discourse to the point that you were able to turn a legitimate word like "age cuck" into a code word for pedophilia. This will happen no more.

So this is a warning to all the nonces. If you're a pedophile (korephile w/e) you are not welcome here. This is not a platform for you to spread your nonce bullshit. If you draw the gaze of my eye to your bullshit I will ban you. And no one will give a shit. This is a forum made by incels for incels. No more pedophiles.
you are not censoring pedos, you censoring hebpiles and ephebophiles.

what is "gentrification"

you are just a scared person hiding behind a screen and have a mod team on is back
 
Last edited:
These are the rules. The entire mod team agrees to them and we will be enforcing them. If you don't like it, there are other forums that can cater to your "tastes." But you're not going anywhere are you? You're going to stay right here.

So your words are empty. Just wind.
Get a little power starts acting different. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: I just don't like the way you fuckers moderate that's why I'm on yo headtop.
 
these niggas be like "I can't talk about how much I want to jack off to little kids it's literally an Orwellian dictatorship!" :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Pol Pot is when you can't jack off to kids.
How many times does it have to be explained to you niggas that a 14 year old isn’t a “pre-pubescent little kid”. This is not opinion it’s biology but agecucks don’t care about facts :feelsclown:
 
How many times does it have to be explained to you niggas that a 14 year old isn’t a “pre-pubescent little kid”. This is not opinion it’s biology but agecucks don’t care about facts :feelsclown:
Just like 4cucks and faggit.
 
generally prepubescent sex is going to be taboo in modern highly technological cities but in small traditional villages this does occur especially ones that commonly do arranged marriages. i know someone who grew up in one of those villages and it was a lot like how you describe, the older man would act almost like a father figure to his young wife
 
Last edited:
Why the fuck did OP get a permaban over this? At no point did he mention age, nor pre-pubescent females.

I'm scared that this place is becoming like the rest of the internet :fuk:
Sure enough the anti-pedo bullshit is getting increasingly ridiculous with the rules being stretched beyond the limit of their applicability because the agecuck jannies are getting their panties in a twist, especially CCPcel with his reddit-tier strawmanning of anti-agecuck points, as if OP's content is any more subversive and degenerate than his history of humblebragging about getting to fuck stacy tier escorts with his richfag gook money. Just lol, as if using monetary incentives to exploit the bodies of whores is any less degenerate than grooming "little girls" (as others noted, the status of pubescence being more unclear than mods are willing admit) with platonic paternalistic affection to fuck them once theyre grown.

We knew this would happen when they decided to make an explicit rule on it and sure enough it's getting progressively more and more out of hand. Even if the jannies thought there was a pedo epidemic, the course theyve taken has only polarized the forum further and made people like me who didnt used to give a shit either way become more staunchly anti-agecuck with each one of these retarded janny sperg-outs. This place is becoming increasingly reddit tier and eventually i wouldnt be surprised if one of the power trippers like CCP or koomsarj are gonna go rogue and end up nuking the place somehow.

Yet, there's no more fitting place for a truecel like myself to be, so yeah im forced to abide by the rules myself, but that doesnt mean we cant voice our criticism of the moderation, for what it's worth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Foremostfiend
Replies
10
Views
643
NoIdeaWhatToDo
NoIdeaWhatToDo
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
8
Views
247
lazy_gamer_423
lazy_gamer_423
Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
5
Views
202
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
gymcellragefuel
Replies
7
Views
170
Grodd
Grodd
SlayerSlayer
Replies
4
Views
258
Raider919
Raider919

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top