Based Ever wonder why foids call their lovers "daddy"?

[LOLI BREEDING]

hahaha it's over for this site. it was ccpcuck wasn't it?

 

[Pikacel]

BASED BASED BASED BASED FUCK PEDOS

 

[PPEcel]

Massive cope the constant 'IT bait' messages are proof of this. This site is under scrutiny, and forced to be scared of public image.

Oh please. When someone says "IT bait" it's to point out that people are creating edgy content not because they believe in its substance, but because they want to be featured on Reddit. It's not because Redditors have any influence over our operations, because they're been trying to deplatform us for 4.5 years and failed.

 

[happiless]

another Mengelecel alt got obliterated

Banned for wrongthink

 

[Deleted member 40050]

Oh please. When someone says "IT bait" it's to point out that people are creating edgy content not because they believe in its substance, but because they want to be featured on Reddit. It's not because Redditors have any influence over our operations, because they're been trying to deplatform us for 4.5 years and failed.

IIRC, there is a thread petitioning for a new private forum which is in suggestions, and you mods are evading it like the plague. It's as if you refuse to make the forum private so people can weaponize the "IT bait" tactic.

Sure enough the anti-pedo bullshit is getting increasingly ridiculous with the rules being stretched beyond the limit of their applicability because the agecuck jannies are getting their panties in a twist, especially CCPcel with his reddit-tier strawmanning of anti-agecuck points, as if OP's content is any more subversive and degenerate than his history of humblebragging about getting to fuck stacy tier escorts with his richfag gook money. Just lol, as if using monetary incentives to exploit the bodies of whores is any less degenerate than grooming "little girls" (as others noted, the status of pubescence being more unclear than mods are willing admit) with platonic paternalistic affection to fuck them once theyre grown.

We knew this would happen when they decided to make an explicit rule on it and sure enough it's getting progressively more and more out of hand. Even if the jannies thought there was a pedo epidemic, the course theyve taken has only polarized the forum further and made people like me who didnt used to give a shit either way become more staunchly anti-agecuck with each one of these retarded janny sperg-outs. This place is becoming increasingly reddit tier and eventually i wouldnt be surprised if one of the power trippers like CCP or koomsarj are gonna go rogue and end up nuking the place somehow.

Yet, there's no more fitting place for a truecel like myself to be, so yeah im forced to abide by the rules myself, but that doesnt mean we cant voice our criticism of the moderation, for what it's worth.

The mods are abusing the appeal to definitition, @CCPcel still refuses to address me on it.

The OP says little girls. 14 years are not little girls. So obviously he's talking about kids.

Go up to people on the street and ask them if 14 year olds are little girls, most of them will say yes, because thats what they fucking are. Most people are not power tripping mods on the internet who make appeal to definition using "wiktionary" and think they are smart and clever because of it.

 

[Inherent]

IIRC, there is a thread petitioning for a new private forum which is in suggestions, and you mods are evading it like the plague. It's as if you refuse to make the forum private so people can weaponize the "IT bait" tactic.

The mods are abusing the appeal to definitition, @CCPcel still refuses to address me on it.

Go up to people on the street and ask them if 14 year olds are little girls, most of them will say yes, because thats what they fucking are. Most people are not power tripping mods on the internet who make appeal to definition using "wiktionary" and think they are smart and clever because of it.

why are you defending this silverberry pedo so much? he deserves to be banned, pedos can fuck off

 

[Don Vito]

Lifefuel for oldcels.

It might be because tall ugly men age better than Chadlets if the last ones don't take care of themselves.

So it creates the perception that old guys age as whine plus they are providers.

Men going for older women like in dating apps is recent stuff.

But I'm talking about foids around 20-35 yo.

 

[Deleted member 40050]

View attachment 613420

@CCPcel is this not an appeal to definition fallacy?

he is using a single source, and penalizing a user on that source.

so why is it okay for you to make appeals to colloquial defintions?

@CCPcel could you please address this

Also @Edmund_Kemper you are good with this kinda stuff, what are your thoughts?

Will also tag @METALMILITA88 and @Wizard32

 

[PPEcel]

IIRC, there is a thread petitioning for a new private forum which is in suggestions, and you mods are evading it like the plague. It's as if you refuse to make the forum private so people can weaponize the "IT bait" tactic.

The Bunker exists. We're not going to saturate the place with even more subforums.

The OP says what it says. The plain meaning of the text is evident. There is no "appeal to definition" issue here.

 

[Master]

In addition to this post, this user is suspected of being an alternate account of an already banned user.