Procreation in the past was exclusive for the genetically fit within a small group of people, usually a village or a tribe, but with the rise of agriculture people started having more kids which resulted in more people thus leading to more "unfit" humans that still mated due to status, culture and religious values. Passing your lineage is the ultimate goal for any organism, this is literally the only purpose that any living thing on earth serves. In the modern world, where you see people who are ugly, unfit, short, poor and posses a familial history of all kinds of chronic diseases popping out multiple kids per generation, which causes the gene pool to become extremely polluted with genes and traits that should not have been passed if nature ran its natural course. This brings me to eugenics, if all the world governments implemented a eugenics program, we could have utopian society withing 2 or 3 lifetimes. We can eradicate certain genetic syndromes (down's, turner, etc), bring down the rates of all hereditary chronic illneses, population control, end food shortages, poverty, inceldom, and have society of tall,beautiful, high IQ humans. The main arguement against eugenics is ethics, which is completly absurd. If ethics is what's preventing the implentation of eugenics, then why is it ethically acceptable to allow genetically inferior humans like midgets or people with deadly hereditary disease to have children? why is it ethiically acceptable to allow people living in extreme poverty to have 10 kids and create even more poverty? if anything eugenics is the most ethical way to solve the worlds problems.
Last edited:
