For long I struggled to understand how most people, particularly women, can hold the status quo opinions, laws and norms in such high regard when it's obvious how much, how often and how arbitrarily these things keep changing when you look at history.
But now I got it, it's simpler than I thought: they simply respect whatever had the power to force itself as the current status quo.
For an example: I've seem men often pointing out how feminists will make a fuss over any petty thing in the west (microaggressions, "mansplaining" and these kinds of bullshit), while ignoring Islamic countries where women are actually oppressed. But the point is, in these countries, Islamic men had the power to uphold themselves and the rulers, this is why they aren't questioned like western men would be for going, even if minimally, against the feminist status quo of the west.
Incels are despised because most of us propose massive change in society, but without the actual means to make it happen.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/p0bh97/incels_will_never_rise_up/
This is basically how women and most men look at us.
Bringing up honest, logical debate about topics that are considered massively controversial in the current status quo, like pedo/hebe/ephebophilia, is just seen as dumb, because why would you question the status quo so fiercely, making yourself a target for repercussions galore, without having the power to topple it?
So even when you have logic and arguments on your side, it doesn't matter; might makes right, so if you don't have the power to actually create change, just shut up according to women and normies. (Of course they will still try to create bullshit arguments to justify any status quo position, but I'm talking about what really matters, which is the power to make things be the way you want them to be).
Normies and women don't care about the hypocrisy of telling us things like "you're not entiled to anything", "stop playing the victim", "go put more effort instead of complaining", etc, while at the same time supporting victimist movements such as feminism or BLM, because these movements have massive support of the status quo and feminism and racist antirracism already proved themselves powerful by implementing a lot of changes in culture, laws, etc.
This is also another reason why hybristophilia/Stockholm syndrome are so common; the criminals foids worship are usually men who actually managed to create change or isolate their victims in a way they created a microcosmos of power in which they are legitimate in abusing them according to "might is right" logic.
A foid might be a staunch feminist who thinks even "manspreading" and 20 yo men dating 17 yo women is wrong, but if she got kidnapped at 12 and kept in a rape dungeon by a man in his 50s, she'd eventually respect, obey and even "love" him, because he would be the one with the legitimate authority (might makes right, remember) to call the shots there according to this way of thinking.
Example of this actually happening:
www.mirror.co.uk
Malignant narcissists and psychopaths will often do that to a minor extent, isolating their partners from friends and family in order to have more power over the woman, which subconsciously creates attraction, "love" and respect on such women. They adore men like that.
But of course, like the globe of death analogy I made in this thread, if you try to commit a crime like in the kidnapper example, or even advocate for massive change in status quo, without actually having the means to do it and failing hard, people will hate you because you'll be seen as weak.
Evil and strong= respected and even "loved"
Evil but weak= ultimately despised
This is how most people think.
On a related note, this is another reason why God is so important. God is the ultimate Chad and His word, the bible, is the parameter for all morality, the rock that prevents things from changing arbitrarily from time to time and new status quo situations to force themselves in power. When God is taken out of the picture, things will go to shit because it'll be often the most psychopathic men rising to positions of power and influence.
But now I got it, it's simpler than I thought: they simply respect whatever had the power to force itself as the current status quo.
For an example: I've seem men often pointing out how feminists will make a fuss over any petty thing in the west (microaggressions, "mansplaining" and these kinds of bullshit), while ignoring Islamic countries where women are actually oppressed. But the point is, in these countries, Islamic men had the power to uphold themselves and the rulers, this is why they aren't questioned like western men would be for going, even if minimally, against the feminist status quo of the west.
Incels are despised because most of us propose massive change in society, but without the actual means to make it happen.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/p0bh97/incels_will_never_rise_up/
This is basically how women and most men look at us.
Bringing up honest, logical debate about topics that are considered massively controversial in the current status quo, like pedo/hebe/ephebophilia, is just seen as dumb, because why would you question the status quo so fiercely, making yourself a target for repercussions galore, without having the power to topple it?
So even when you have logic and arguments on your side, it doesn't matter; might makes right, so if you don't have the power to actually create change, just shut up according to women and normies. (Of course they will still try to create bullshit arguments to justify any status quo position, but I'm talking about what really matters, which is the power to make things be the way you want them to be).
Normies and women don't care about the hypocrisy of telling us things like "you're not entiled to anything", "stop playing the victim", "go put more effort instead of complaining", etc, while at the same time supporting victimist movements such as feminism or BLM, because these movements have massive support of the status quo and feminism and racist antirracism already proved themselves powerful by implementing a lot of changes in culture, laws, etc.
This is also another reason why hybristophilia/Stockholm syndrome are so common; the criminals foids worship are usually men who actually managed to create change or isolate their victims in a way they created a microcosmos of power in which they are legitimate in abusing them according to "might is right" logic.
A foid might be a staunch feminist who thinks even "manspreading" and 20 yo men dating 17 yo women is wrong, but if she got kidnapped at 12 and kept in a rape dungeon by a man in his 50s, she'd eventually respect, obey and even "love" him, because he would be the one with the legitimate authority (might makes right, remember) to call the shots there according to this way of thinking.
Example of this actually happening:
Josef Fritzl sent women fans' mail
Cellar "incest monster" Josef Fritzl has been sent 200 letters from lonely women around the world offering him love and support.
www.mirror.co.uk
Malignant narcissists and psychopaths will often do that to a minor extent, isolating their partners from friends and family in order to have more power over the woman, which subconsciously creates attraction, "love" and respect on such women. They adore men like that.
But of course, like the globe of death analogy I made in this thread, if you try to commit a crime like in the kidnapper example, or even advocate for massive change in status quo, without actually having the means to do it and failing hard, people will hate you because you'll be seen as weak.
Evil and strong= respected and even "loved"
Evil but weak= ultimately despised
This is how most people think.
On a related note, this is another reason why God is so important. God is the ultimate Chad and His word, the bible, is the parameter for all morality, the rock that prevents things from changing arbitrarily from time to time and new status quo situations to force themselves in power. When God is taken out of the picture, things will go to shit because it'll be often the most psychopathic men rising to positions of power and influence.
Last edited:
