View: https://www.tiktok.com/@tee.saigonese/video/7517769431628418359
I was scrolling ShitTok as usual when I stumbled upon this downright retarded video. It's referring to a trend where people upload pictures of their ex and the so-called trauma that was inflicted upon them—by a purportedly ugly ex. Obviously, since women are lookist whores, they dominate this trend by posting pictures of their exes online—which is, of course, despicable behavior. Amusingly, the "ugly" ex is often looksmatched to them, or even better looking
.Anyway, this woman put a caption about how “men never give ugly women a chance”. And while she thinks she’s being all righteous and calling out men, it’s painfully obvious she’s just projecting.
She’s essentially admitting:
- That women are hyper-selective, and she assumes men must be the same.
- That she sees being “ugly” as a disqualifier—which ironically means she wouldn’t date an ugly man either.
- That she expects Chads to give ugly women a “chance” even though women routinely ignore average or below-average men without a second thought. We can assume she is talking about Chads, as women are highly susceptible to the apex fallacy, and it's certain that this is also the case here.
- That she sees dating so-called ugly men as "giving them a chance" — which is direct proof of the blackpill. It’s also ironic, since she herself is an unattractive woman who has certainly dated above her looksmatch many times, and rejected men who are looksmatched to her.
And here’s the key part: the reason this “ugly women get no chance” claim feels true to her is because—as I mentioned—she is focusing specifically on Chads and doesn't consider unattractive men as human, and because women rate most men as very unattractive, and most women normally. As seen by this chart, which I have posted here multiple times before:
Add makeup into the mix, and the disparity grows to an absurd extent:
What this means is that when she talks about ugly women never being given a chance, her perception is fundamentally flawed—because she likely considers only a tiny percentage of women ugly and sees the majority of men as grotesque, or not men at all. This obviously leads to the impression that men never give ugly women a chance, but it’s a perceptual bias—not reality.
That’s why it feels like “ugly women never get a chance” — because to women, “ugly men” are almost everyone, and “ugly women” are practically no one. Also, as mentioned before, it's an apex fallacy.
And as expected, the replies on that video prove exactly what I am saying:
These comments are a perfect example of what I have been saying—insane projection, apex fallacy, and the perceptual bias women have when it comes to men’s dating behavior. When they say "men" don't date ugly women—the word 'men' here is conflated with Chad. It’s based on underrating men and overrating women, which is a cognitive distortion that makes them think men are these ego-driven creatures who only want to date “up” visually, because in their eyes, a man can't possibly date down, as all women are beautiful
:These comments perfectly sum up the female delusion I am talking about here. Women genuinely believe they’re all "baddies" and can’t understand why men supposedly “won’t give ugly women a chance.” From their perspective, they are the standard of beauty, and any rejection must come from male shallowness or cruelty—rejection that typically comes from men way out of their league, when they could still date above their looksmatch with ease
This illustrates the core of the problem: women vastly overrate themselves and assume Chads should be lining up to date them all, regardless of how realistic that is. This whole video and the comments under it are essentially filled with underlying entitlement to Chads, because they believe all women are beautiful and looksmatched to Chad.
Last edited:
