Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion [Dogpill] A psychoanalysis of the dogpill

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1060
  • Start date
This should be pinned
 
If a human male fucks a female animal then yes.

But it's still under debate whether a male dog fucking a female human should be considered as an animal abuse.

Many argue that it's not an abuse since the male dog is fucking the human female using its own volition. The male dog is not being forced to do it against its will.

:lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul:
BASED
 
You can’t eacape the dogpill. Soon normies will wake up to reality.
 
brilliant post tbh every father should read this before buying a dog for their daughters
 
Stop this bullshit rn or i'll actually start to believe it
 
Dogpilled as always :feelsokman:
 
Fun fact: in vietnam prostitutes fucked dogs for money. This was a common thing apparently, the dogpill is reality.
 
Stop this bullshit rn or i'll actually start to believe it

dogpill --> denial --> anger --> depression --> bargaining --> acceptance --> dogpill

life is a cycle of phases boyo, embrace the dogpill.
 
The size and shape of a dog-dick is a knowledge and every knowledge is valuable.

False. There are a lot of things that are considered "knowledge" that are an utter waste of brain memory space, like knowing the lines of some characters in some movie.

Unless you're training to become a vet or you're some kind of biologist specializing in mammals.... or you're a dog-fucking degenerate, then this information can be classified as effectively useless.
 
holy shit dude you have a problem
 
False. There are a lot of things that are considered "knowledge" that are an utter waste of brain memory space, like knowing the lines of some characters in some movie.

Don't agree. There were times when things like "graph theory" used to be considered as waste of time and people used to think of it as a joke. Now people do PhD on this.


Unless you're training to become a vet or you're some kind of biologist specializing in mammals.... or you're dog-fucking degenerate, then this information can be classified as effectively useless.

Not all avenue of knowledge was discovered by the specialists. You don't need to be a vet or mammalian-biologist or a dog-fucker to appreciate the elegance of the dog-dick.
holy shit dude you have a problem
:lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul:
 
In Islam it’s haram to own a dog as a pet. I used to think this was weird but now I understand the wisdom behind it after accepting the dogpill. Allah is truly great.
 
Just fucking imagine if men started fucking female dogs. Imagine the literal societal melt down the world would have. Sometimes I feel as if we're inside of a laboratory being monitored as our overlords or scientist expirement by introducing degeneracy and unfairness and its effects on intelligent life.

Were really at the point where we are willing to accept human beings fucking dogs because females are doing it. This is really how far humanity has come. Fuck this world seriously
 
Just fucking imagine if men started fucking female dogs. Imagine the literal societal melt down the world would have. Sometimes I feel as if we're inside of a laboratory being monitored as our overlords or scientist expirement by introducing degeneracy and unfairness and its effects on intelligent life.

Were really at the point where we are willing to accept human beings fucking dogs because females are doing it. This is really how far humanity has come. Fuck this world seriously

There is a big difference between male bestiality and female bestiality. Men fuck animals out of desperation or mental illness. There is no emotion involved.

But women fuck animals (i.e. dogs) for emotional need, they get emotionally attached to it.
 
There is a big difference between male bestiality and female bestiality. Men fuck animals out of desperation or mental illness. There is no emotion involved.

But women fuck animals (i.e. dogs) for emotional need, they get emotionally attached to it.

I dont care why they fucking do it it's still degenerate and wrong
 
A gentle bump for redditards, looks like there are plenty of them.
 
Science has gone too far
 
I guess that means that the larger breeds aren't very likely to be injured by a human male fucking them. It's unfortunate that real bitches aren't attractive like the sapient ones that speak English in animation.



*whimper*



I would fuck those talking dogs, but real ones just aren't anthropomorphized enough to give the same effect.

Maybe if we transplanted the brains of quadriplegic foids into healthy bitch bodies or something? You'd also have to get some kinda voice synthesizer connected to the brain since even if they had human brains it's doubtful dog mouths could emulate human language, and paws prevent sign language.

:feelsugh:
 
There is a big difference between male bestiality and female bestiality.
Men fuck animals out of desperation or mental illness.
There is no emotion involved.
But women fuck animals (i.e. dogs) for emotional need, they get emotionally attached to it.
Seems like a false dichotomy to me.

I can imagine some men doing erotic stuff with animals out of emotional need, and I can imagine having low-emotion sex with them too.

Both kinds would exist with both sexes and I don't even see any grounds for assuming one is more common than the other.

Dogs are obedient and THIRSTY so they will give endless oral sex to a foid even if the foid never gives any in return, so a woman could do this simply for being a selfish lover not because of emotional need, unless you call 1-sided unconditional love from a captive slave an emotional need.
 
Don't agree. There were times when things like "graph theory" used to be considered as waste of time and people used to think of it as a joke. Now people do PhD on this.


You're conflating "applicable" with "valuable." All mathematics is valuable, even though not all of it is yet applicable.

Not all avenue of knowledge was discovered by the specialists. You don't need to be a vet or mammalian-biologist or a dog-fucker to appreciate the elegance of the dog-dick.

You're a fucking weirdo, brocel.
 
Nice research, I am sure some Professors will steal it from you.
 
You're conflating "applicable" with "valuable." All mathematics is valuable, even though not all of it is yet applicable.

I don't understand, are you trying to mean the appreciation of the elegance of the dog-dick and all knowledges that surrounds and emanates from it are neither applicable nor valuable?
Nice research, I am sure some Professors will steal it from you.
:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman:
Science has gone too far
:lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul:
Seems like a false dichotomy to me.

I can imagine some men doing erotic stuff with animals out of emotional need, and I can imagine having low-emotion sex with them too.

Both kinds would exist with both sexes and I don't even see any grounds for assuming one is more common than the other.

Dogs are obedient and THIRSTY so they will give endless oral sex to a foid even if the foid never gives any in return, so a woman could do this simply for being a selfish lover not because of emotional need, unless you call 1-sided unconditional love from a captive slave an emotional need.

Some practical/anatomical facts:

1. Dog pussies are not fuckable, unless the female-dog is "huge". Dog pussies are very small, furry and not suitable for taking human dicks. Human dicks are not pointy at the tip like that of the dog-dicks. This is main reason why human males tend to fuck goats, sheeps and mares. A guy fucking a dog is extremely rare and even if it happens, it renders the female-dog injured (sometimes death from bleeding/hemorrhoid).

2. Fucking a female dog by a man does not happen in an organic way, not possible by a human male. Female dogs come to "heat" once in a year (like most canines). In order to fuck, a male dog has to chase her for days (even for weeks). Even when they click hormonally and if the male dog tries to mount her, she tries to bite. It takes a several attempts for a male dog to convince the female. And this entire mechanism is instinctively achieved by the male dog. If a human male wants to fuck a female dog, he needs to literally tie her up and rape her. It's not an enjoyable sex, neither for the human nor the dog. So achieving an emotional attachment from such sexual act is very difficult.

3. But when a male dog fucks a female human, it's completely different. The male dog willingly fucks the woman. The dog can naturally achieve arousal (hard on) and mounts her. Also a dog-dick can nicely lock into a woman's vagina. It's a match made in heaven. But when an oral sex is performed by a dog, it's not a sexual act from the dog's view, you are right in that case. That's why most women puts peanut-butter on her vagina to fool the dog to make him lick her pussy. But still, the dog gets attached to female thinking that her vagina is a food source.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 177260
The dogpill is absolutely real. There are more girls willing to fuck dogs than incels
Moranda B said:
I was able to organize and do a deep clean
Yup

If a human male fucks a female animal then yes.

But it's still under debate whether a male dog fucking a female human should be considered as an animal abuse.

Many argue that it's not an abuse since the male dog is fucking the human female using its own volition. The male dog is not being forced to do it against its will.
You seem to be implying that all by male humans is "forced".

While it's true that non-humans can't adopt obviously voluntary postures like cowgirl/reverse cowgirl where the guy remains stationary and the girl does all the moving, we know it's not 100% rape when human females voluntarily stay still and let themselves be fucked, so why would you think that of non-human females?

You oversimplify sex to "the fucker" and "the fuckee" as if the recipient using their orifice could not be an active participant.

brilliant post tbh every father should read this before buying a dog for their daughters
It's actually a great idea to buy a male dog for your daughter, if she's getting her sexual needs from a dog then hopefully she might be less likely to have early premarital sex with Chad for validation.

Just fucking imagine if men started fucking female dogs.
Some already are, plenty of evidence of that on places like Zooville.

Imagine the literal societal melt down the world would have.
Humans have always fucked non-human things. I think maybe you're asking is if it became legal to do?

Society wouldn't melt down any more than it would from getting access to pocket pussies, it just lowers foid SMV and bargaining power, which is a good thing.

Were really at the point where we are willing to accept human beings fucking dogs because females are doing it. This is really how far humanity has come. Fuck this world seriously
Whatever road gets us there is a good one, since it results in less female monopolization of sex.

That said, caring for a dog is a lot more expensive and time-consuming than buying an onahole so I think those would probably be a competitive alternative.

Men fuck animals out of desperation or mental illness.
There is no emotion involved.
But women fuck animals (i.e. dogs) for emotional need,
they get emotionally attached to it.
Men can get emotionally attached to their pets too, I don't see any need for you to make absolute rulings like this.

You're stereotyping: women can be low-emotion sociopathic rapists towards dogs too. There's sick vids out there of lesbians abusing drugged male dogs like they were dildos, it's degenerate as fuck.

Conversely, if guys fucking their huskies or whatever say they're in love and shit, I don't see any reason to doubt their genuineness compared to foids.

Some practical/anatomical facts:

1. Dog pussies are not fuckable, unless the female-dog is "huge".
What breed are you calling huge here?

The best guideline for us would be to look at what point a dog male's dick gets to similar dimensions as a human male's dick.

Presumably a bitch of the same breed as that male has a vagina big enough to take his cock, so she could take a similar-sized human cock too.

Note "bitch" implies "in heat" though. Most likely bigger cocks can be taken while in heat (hormones cause flexibility of tissues) and when warm/aroused. This is important to keep in mind since human females are "in heat" (estrus) year-round so they would not have the same degree of hormonal fluctuation.

Dog pussies are very small, furry and not suitable for taking human dicks.
Human dicks are not pointy at the tip like that of the dog-dicks.
Why do you think the pointyness matters? That probably helps in prying open a closed vagina but if it widens to the same girth midway then why would it matter regarding internal capacity?

This is main reason why human males tend to fuck goats, sheeps and mares.
That or maybe they're more attractive than dogs to some men? *shrug*
FEAR of injury rather than ACTUAL CHANCE of injury might be more of a factor though.

That and maybe because guys don't want to do foreplay or have observation to ensure arousal and maximum vaginal dilation, so you wouldn't have to worry about that with horses because even when they're not in heat and even when they're not aroused their vagina is twice as big as a human's.

A guy fucking a dog is extremely rare and even if it happens, it renders the female-dog injured (sometimes death from bleeding/hemorrhoid).
I don't think you can prove that is a guaranteed outcome in all situations. Consider for example, if the guy doing this had a micropenis dwarfed even by the tiniest chihuahua, or if it was this bitch:
Tallest-female-dog_tcm25-444084.jpg


2. Fucking a female dog by a man does not happen in an organic way, not possible by a human male. Female dogs come to "heat" once in a year (like most canines). In order to fuck, a male dog has to chase her for days (even for weeks). Even when they click hormonally and if the male dog tries to mount her, she tries to bite. It takes a several attempts for a male dog to convince the female. And this entire mechanism is instinctively achieved by the male dog. If a human male wants to fuck a female dog, he needs to literally tie her up and rape her.
This sounds like bullshit to me.

Male dogs don't need to "tie up and rape" female dogs, they just "convince" them eventually when the bitch is horny enough.

The biting and stuff would happen because he tries to mount without adequate foreplay so she's not in the mood, not at the peak of her heat cycle or whatev.

In theory the female would NEVER bite if he timed it right, unless biting is some kind of shit-test to see how brave/agile it is.

It's not an enjoyable sex, neither for the human nor the dog. So achieving an emotional attachment from such sexual act is very difficult.
At least you say 'difficult' and not 'impossible'. Unenjoyability is not inevitably though, even if finding enjoyment would be very hard and take a lot of conscientious consideration.

3. But when a male dog fucks a female human, it's completely different. The male dog willingly fucks the woman.
Not always, women rape male dogs sometimes.

If a male dog can fuck willingly then a female dog can fuck willingly. Drop the feminist double-standards Gloria.

The dog can naturally achieve arousal (hard on) and mounts her.
Female dogs can also naturally achieve arousal (it's just more subtle, read my thread on internal erections that foids have) and present themselves for mounting.

Also a dog-dick can nicely lock into a woman's vagina. It's a match made in heaven.
That's one factor to consider: do female dogs necessarily want to be knot-locked for 20+ minutes? Or are they just too stupid to foresee this is an eventual consequence of letting a male dog fuck them?

That's one benefit to human males, since they don't force them to stay knotted like that.

when an oral sex is performed by a dog,
it's not a sexual act from the dog's view,
Not always, but it CAN be. Why couldn't it be?

That's why most women puts peanut-butter on her vagina to fool the dog to make him lick her pussy.
heh *make*

Dogs try to sniff/lick everywhere on bodies, food or not. It's not really necessary, they'd do it eventually, PB would just speed it along if they were apprehensive about someone. Obviously it's less sexual and more about food in that case.
 
this is the reason why foids mostly own male dogs
 
@chudur-budur is constantly dropping NSFWpills

You never know what you’ll see under one of his spoiler tags
:giga::feelsohgod::feelspuke:
 
@chudur-budur is constantly dropping NSFWpills

You never know what you’ll see under one of his spoiler tags
:giga::feelsohgod::feelspuke:
I'm still scarred from the granny porn one, I can never click on his spoilers.
 
In Islam it’s haram to own a dog as a pet. I used to think this was weird but now I understand the wisdom behind it after accepting the dogpill. Allah is truly great.
Anime gifs are also haram.
 
did I miss the IT screenshot already
 
@chudur-budur is constantly dropping NSFWpills

You never know what you’ll see under one of his spoiler tags
:giga::feelsohgod::feelspuke:
:feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
I'm still scarred from the granny porn one, I can never click on his spoilers.
:lul::feelsokman::lul::lul::lul:
You seem to be implying that all by male humans is "forced".

While it's true that non-humans can't adopt obviously voluntary postures like cowgirl/reverse cowgirl where the guy remains stationary and the girl does all the moving, we know it's not 100% rape when human females voluntarily stay still and let themselves be fucked, so why would you think that of non-human females?

You oversimplify sex to "the fucker" and "the fuckee" as if the recipient using their orifice could not be an active participant.

To have sex, a male mammal has to have a "hard on", you can't fuck with a limpy dick. Even if a woman wants to mount a male, she can't, if the male is not willing or not in a participatory arousal.

If a male has a hard on and willing to insert it's inside anything (not just a vagina), that means the male has given a consent.
 
Last edited:
Yup


You seem to be implying that all by male humans is "forced".

While it's true that non-humans can't adopt obviously voluntary postures like cowgirl/reverse cowgirl where the guy remains stationary and the girl does all the moving, we know it's not 100% rape when human females voluntarily stay still and let themselves be fucked, so why would you think that of non-human females?

You oversimplify sex to "the fucker" and "the fuckee" as if the recipient using their orifice could not be an active participant.


It's actually a great idea to buy a male dog for your daughter, if she's getting her sexual needs from a dog then hopefully she might be less likely to have early premarital sex with Chad for validation.


Some already are, plenty of evidence of that on places like Zooville.


Humans have always fucked non-human things. I think maybe you're asking is if it became legal to do?

Society wouldn't melt down any more than it would from getting access to pocket pussies, it just lowers foid SMV and bargaining power, which is a good thing.


Whatever road gets us there is a good one, since it results in less female monopolization of sex.

That said, caring for a dog is a lot more expensive and time-consuming than buying an onahole so I think those would probably be a competitive alternative.


Men can get emotionally attached to their pets too, I don't see any need for you to make absolute rulings like this.

You're stereotyping: women can be low-emotion sociopathic rapists towards dogs too. There's sick vids out there of lesbians abusing drugged male dogs like they were dildos, it's degenerate as fuck.

Conversely, if guys fucking their huskies or whatever say they're in love and shit, I don't see any reason to doubt their genuineness compared to foids.


What breed are you calling huge here?

The best guideline for us would be to look at what point a dog male's dick gets to similar dimensions as a human male's dick.

Presumably a bitch of the same breed as that male has a vagina big enough to take his cock, so she could take a similar-sized human cock too.

Note "bitch" implies "in heat" though. Most likely bigger cocks can be taken while in heat (hormones cause flexibility of tissues) and when warm/aroused. This is important to keep in mind since human females are "in heat" (estrus) year-round so they would not have the same degree of hormonal fluctuation.


Why do you think the pointyness matters? That probably helps in prying open a closed vagina but if it widens to the same girth midway then why would it matter regarding internal capacity?


That or maybe they're more attractive than dogs to some men? *shrug*
FEAR of injury rather than ACTUAL CHANCE of injury might be more of a factor though.

That and maybe because guys don't want to do foreplay or have observation to ensure arousal and maximum vaginal dilation, so you wouldn't have to worry about that with horses because even when they're not in heat and even when they're not aroused their vagina is twice as big as a human's.


I don't think you can prove that is a guaranteed outcome in all situations. Consider for example, if the guy doing this had a micropenis dwarfed even by the tiniest chihuahua, or if it was this bitch:
Tallest-female-dog_tcm25-444084.jpg



This sounds like bullshit to me.

Male dogs don't need to "tie up and rape" female dogs, they just "convince" them eventually when the bitch is horny enough.

The biting and stuff would happen because he tries to mount without adequate foreplay so she's not in the mood, not at the peak of her heat cycle or whatev.

In theory the female would NEVER bite if he timed it right, unless biting is some kind of shit-test to see how brave/agile it is.


At least you say 'difficult' and not 'impossible'. Unenjoyability is not inevitably though, even if finding enjoyment would be very hard and take a lot of conscientious consideration.


Not always, women rape male dogs sometimes.

If a male dog can fuck willingly then a female dog can fuck willingly. Drop the feminist double-standards Gloria.


Female dogs can also naturally achieve arousal (it's just more subtle, read my thread on internal erections that foids have) and present themselves for mounting.


That's one factor to consider: do female dogs necessarily want to be knot-locked for 20+ minutes? Or are they just too stupid to foresee this is an eventual consequence of letting a male dog fuck them?

That's one benefit to human males, since they don't force them to stay knotted like that.


Not always, but it CAN be. Why couldn't it be?


heh *make*

Dogs try to sniff/lick everywhere on bodies, food or not. It's not really necessary, they'd do it eventually, PB would just speed it along if they were apprehensive about someone. Obviously it's less sexual and more about food in that case.
You quoted me in words I didn't wrote
 
You quoted me in words I didn't wrote
Ah FUCK sorry Excluded :( I must've got mixed up when copying and pasting shit together, looks to be chudur-budur who said a lot of that...

I think what happened is sometimes I think I copied a new quote= tag but didn't so the previous one is retained in the clipboard and then I go and use it and don't notice the mismatch.

I really ought to stop the C+P because I've noticed that the forum software will automatically merge consecutive posts by same user into a single post, which is a GREAT feature.

It won't let me go back and edit it to fix this...so for @chudur-budur I am going to re-quote the stuff I fucked up with my responses again, prior to making a followup reply to his subsequent post.

Some practical/anatomical facts:

1. Dog pussies are not fuckable, unless the female-dog is "huge".
What breed are you calling huge here?

The best guideline for us would be to look at what point a dog male's dick gets to similar dimensions as a human male's dick.

Presumably a bitch of the same breed as that male has a vagina big enough to take his cock, so she could take a similar-sized human cock too.

Note "bitch" implies "in heat" though. Most likely bigger cocks can be taken while in heat (hormones cause flexibility of tissues) and when warm/aroused. This is important to keep in mind since human females are "in heat" (estrus) year-round so they would not have the same degree of hormonal fluctuation.

Dog pussies are very small, furry and not suitable for taking human dicks.
Human dicks are not pointy at the tip like that of the dog-dicks.
Why do you think the pointyness matters? That probably helps in prying open a closed vagina but if it widens to the same girth midway then why would it matter regarding internal capacity?

This is main reason why human males tend to fuck goats, sheeps and mares.
That or maybe they're more attractive than dogs to some men? *shrug*
FEAR of injury rather than ACTUAL CHANCE of injury might be more of a factor though.

That and maybe because guys don't want to do foreplay or have observation to ensure arousal and maximum vaginal dilation, so you wouldn't have to worry about that with horses because even when they're not in heat and even when they're not aroused their vagina is twice as big as a human's.

A guy fucking a dog is extremely rare and even if it happens, it renders the female-dog injured (sometimes death from bleeding/hemorrhoid).
I don't think you can prove that is a guaranteed outcome in all situations. Consider for example, if the guy doing this had a micropenis dwarfed even by the tiniest chihuahua, or if it was this bitch:
Tallest-female-dog_tcm25-444084.jpg


2. Fucking a female dog by a man does not happen in an organic way, not possible by a human male. Female dogs come to "heat" once in a year (like most canines). In order to fuck, a male dog has to chase her for days (even for weeks). Even when they click hormonally and if the male dog tries to mount her, she tries to bite. It takes a several attempts for a male dog to convince the female. And this entire mechanism is instinctively achieved by the male dog. If a human male wants to fuck a female dog, he needs to literally tie her up and rape her.
This sounds like bullshit to me.

Male dogs don't need to "tie up and rape" female dogs, they just "convince" them eventually when the bitch is horny enough.

The biting and stuff would happen because he tries to mount without adequate foreplay so she's not in the mood, not at the peak of her heat cycle or whatev.

In theory the female would NEVER bite if he timed it right, unless biting is some kind of shit-test to see how brave/agile it is.

It's not an enjoyable sex, neither for the human nor the dog. So achieving an emotional attachment from such sexual act is very difficult.
At least you say 'difficult' and not 'impossible'. Unenjoyability is not inevitably though, even if finding enjoyment would be very hard and take a lot of conscientious consideration.

3. But when a male dog fucks a female human, it's completely different.
The male dog willingly fucks the woman.
Not always, women rape male dogs sometimes.

If a male dog can fuck willingly then a female dog can fuck willingly. Drop the feminist double-standards Gloria.

The dog can naturally achieve arousal (hard on) and mounts her.
Female dogs can also naturally achieve arousal (it's just more subtle, read my thread on internal erections that foids have) and present themselves for mounting.

Also a dog-dick can nicely lock into a woman's vagina. It's a match made in heaven.
That's one factor to consider: do female dogs necessarily want to be knot-locked for 20+ minutes? Or are they just too stupid to foresee this is an eventual consequence of letting a male dog fuck them?

That's one benefit to human males, since they don't force them to stay knotted like that.

But when an oral sex is performed by a dog, it's not a sexual act from the dog's view, you are right in that case.
Not always, but it CAN be. Why couldn't it be?

That's why most women puts peanut-butter on her vagina to fool the dog to make him lick her pussy.
heh *make*

Dogs try to sniff/lick everywhere on bodies, food or not. It's not really necessary, they'd do it eventually, PB would just speed it along if they were apprehensive about someone. Obviously it's less sexual and more about food in that case.

- - -

and now for NEW replies to CHUDUR:

To have sex, a male mammal has to have a "hard on",
you can't fuck with a limpy dick.
Even if a woman wants to mount a male, she can't,
if the male is not willing or not in a participatory arousal.

I'm pretty sure pornographers might also abuse dogs with viagra, or maybe "fluff" them with the presence of a bitch in heat (if they aren't aroused by human females) to get them hard.

If a male has a hard on and willing to insert it's inside anything (not just a vagina), that means the male has given a consent.
If the dog is voluntarily moving its own hips, I agree, but I've seen vids of foids forcing a male dog onto its back (I don't even know if it's conscious) and just sitting onto the cock. It seems extremely rapey to me, so my point is that just because a penis is penetrating a hole doesn't mean the penis-owner has given consent to penetrate that hole.

DONE
 
we get mogged in every way possible by these pets
 
I am completely paralyzed after this reading, this pill was too heavy for me, I will go to sleep.
 
Damn, completely different species, can’t even compete.

Also mods pin this ASAP
 

Similar threads

Swag Lord
Replies
34
Views
1K
Emba
Emba
AsiaCel
Replies
0
Views
186
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
Retardfuel
Replies
5
Views
485
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur
Retardfuel
Replies
38
Views
2K
der_komische
der_komische
IncelusRex
Replies
23
Views
334
Regenerator
Regenerator

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top