HeOweGoreWrath
Paragon
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 20, 2018
- Posts
- 19,729
People seem to dispute the idea that penis pumps can cause permanent size gains, but I like to be open-minded about this. We know in bodybuilding that a 'pump' can create sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, which is basically the ability to trap more water in the cell, so why wouldn't this work by increases in dick pressure too? Vascularity is blood supply.
One article appears to claim sex can do this but I can't read all of it since it's behind a paywall
Men's Health OTOH claims it won't help you but somehow gives your children big dicks but it's BS rationale
Ken clearly misunderstands cause and effect: Occam's Razor here is that ancestors with larger equipment got to have more frequent sex. He even acknowledges the ancestor beetles already had huge dongs so clearly it wasn't fucking that gave it to them.
More sex somehow rewriting your DNA is a pretty huge claim, I'm not really talking about rewriting the germline, just how we adapt to our environments.
If I built huge legs squatting that wouldn't AFAIK improve the chances of a child sired by me having huge legs compared to if I didn't.
There's merely a correlation: those CAPABLE of building big legs (as demonstrated by accomplishing it) are more likely to have kids also capable if it.
One article appears to claim sex can do this but I can't read all of it since it's behind a paywall
Having more sex 'can help you to evolve a bigger penis'
According to science, the more sex you have, the bigger your penis will become.
www.telegraph.co.uk
Men's Health OTOH claims it won't help you but somehow gives your children big dicks but it's BS rationale
Having More Sex Increases Penis Size | Men's Health Australia
Surely this is too good to be true! A study has found having more sex increases penis size - but there's a catch.
www.menshealth.com.au
Ken Adams said:Having more sex alters your DNA and gifts your descendants with the physical traits to meet the demands of your lifestyle.
The study monitored the beetles for ten generations, and found that those beetles that had sex more frequently had ancestors with noticeably larger equipment downstairs.
Ken clearly misunderstands cause and effect: Occam's Razor here is that ancestors with larger equipment got to have more frequent sex. He even acknowledges the ancestor beetles already had huge dongs so clearly it wasn't fucking that gave it to them.
More sex somehow rewriting your DNA is a pretty huge claim, I'm not really talking about rewriting the germline, just how we adapt to our environments.
If I built huge legs squatting that wouldn't AFAIK improve the chances of a child sired by me having huge legs compared to if I didn't.
There's merely a correlation: those CAPABLE of building big legs (as demonstrated by accomplishing it) are more likely to have kids also capable if it.