
wereq.feelsdevil
Cursed By Fate | Defeated By Fate
-
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2022
- Posts
- 37,865
We are now seeing riots and mass protests unfold across major cities all over America due to Trump's anti-migration crackdowns through ICE raids. This begs the question, do you think the far-right and White nationalists will be able to reverse 400 years of precedent by driving out all non-Whites?
The precedent I'm talking about here is the importation of third world labor which was first established in the form of slavery in the 1600s to expanded their agrarian production and trade. That kind of economics of using third world labor remained when railways were set up and it exists even today in the form of indentured labor in the tech sector. Third world labor was needed because native Whites did not want to do the kind of degrading hard labor that is always needed in general to produce relatively cheap goods of decent quality.
So given that this model hasn't changed for over 400 years, what realistic chance do White nationalists have at reversing this trend by totally shutting off third world migration, especially given now at a time when their birth rates have falling and populations aging over the last 50 years? People are underestimating the value of having a prime age workforce. As developed Western economies become aged and weak due to female hypergamy and collapse of gender relations along with rising costs of living and loss of welfare, they will increasingly look upon prime age third worlders like curries and nigs as a commodity and resource that is as vital as oil.
Overall, I think this is a terrible prospect. Cultural contact facilitated by colonization and globalization has proven to be a clear failure, and yet I don't see women losing their rights. I don't see men rising up in masses to subjugate women and reduce them to birthing vessels.
The precedent I'm talking about here is the importation of third world labor which was first established in the form of slavery in the 1600s to expanded their agrarian production and trade. That kind of economics of using third world labor remained when railways were set up and it exists even today in the form of indentured labor in the tech sector. Third world labor was needed because native Whites did not want to do the kind of degrading hard labor that is always needed in general to produce relatively cheap goods of decent quality.
So given that this model hasn't changed for over 400 years, what realistic chance do White nationalists have at reversing this trend by totally shutting off third world migration, especially given now at a time when their birth rates have falling and populations aging over the last 50 years? People are underestimating the value of having a prime age workforce. As developed Western economies become aged and weak due to female hypergamy and collapse of gender relations along with rising costs of living and loss of welfare, they will increasingly look upon prime age third worlders like curries and nigs as a commodity and resource that is as vital as oil.
Overall, I think this is a terrible prospect. Cultural contact facilitated by colonization and globalization has proven to be a clear failure, and yet I don't see women losing their rights. I don't see men rising up in masses to subjugate women and reduce them to birthing vessels.
Last edited: