Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Do you think White nationalists will be able to reverse 400 years of precedent by driving out all non-Whites?

wereq.feelsdevil

wereq.feelsdevil

Cursed By Fate | Defeated By Fate
-
Joined
Sep 11, 2022
Posts
37,865
We are now seeing riots and mass protests unfold across major cities all over America due to Trump's anti-migration crackdowns through ICE raids. This begs the question, do you think the far-right and White nationalists will be able to reverse 400 years of precedent by driving out all non-Whites?

The precedent I'm talking about here is the importation of third world labor which was first established in the form of slavery in the 1600s to expanded their agrarian production and trade. That kind of economics of using third world labor remained when railways were set up and it exists even today in the form of indentured labor in the tech sector. Third world labor was needed because native Whites did not want to do the kind of degrading hard labor that is always needed in general to produce relatively cheap goods of decent quality.

So given that this model hasn't changed for over 400 years, what realistic chance do White nationalists have at reversing this trend by totally shutting off third world migration, especially given now at a time when their birth rates have falling and populations aging over the last 50 years? People are underestimating the value of having a prime age workforce. As developed Western economies become aged and weak due to female hypergamy and collapse of gender relations along with rising costs of living and loss of welfare, they will increasingly look upon prime age third worlders like curries and nigs as a commodity and resource that is as vital as oil.

Overall, I think this is a terrible prospect. Cultural contact facilitated by colonization and globalization has proven to be a clear failure, and yet I don't see women losing their rights. I don't see men rising up in masses to subjugate women and reduce them to birthing vessels.
 
Last edited:
Instead of being driven out I'd rather they just end my life.
 
whites will end inshallah
Doubt it, but they will become a true minority in a Balkanized North America with no more than 30 to 35% of the population. They are 50% of the population now,
 
Doubt it, but they will become a true minority in a Balkanized North America with no more than 30 to 35% of the population. They are 50% of the population now,
I meant their numbers and power
 
It won't happen. Some areas will still remain majority white but most major white countries seem like they're beyond recovery, especially in major cities.
 
It won't happen. Some areas will still remain majority white but most major white countries seem like they're beyond recovery, especially in major cities.
So balkanization then. I was right to state:
Doubt it, but they will become a true minority in a Balkanized North America with no more than 30 to 35% of the population. They are 50% of the population now,
 
and ofc it's a pajeet

Don't get me wrong, i don't like niggers, but pajeets are fucking insufferable

kill yourself irl
we'll replace you and rape your snowbunnies
 
and ofc it's a pajeet

Don't get me wrong, i don't like niggers, but pajeets are fucking insufferable
Says the Chud who obsessed over phenotypes. Anyways, I asked ChatGPT the question of my thread and this is how it responded:



You're bringing up a complex mix of historical, economic, demographic, and sociopolitical themes that are tightly interwoven. Let’s take this step by step with clarity and objectivity.




1. The Historical Precedent:


You're right that Western economies—especially settler-colonial ones like the U.S.—have long relied on imported labor, starting with the transatlantic slave trade and evolving into systems of indentured servitude, migrant labor, and outsourcing. This dynamic was driven by the economic imperative of obtaining cheap, compliant labor to sustain production and profits in sectors native workers often avoided.


  • Slavery and servitude: foundational to the U.S. economy.
  • Railroad workers (Chinese), farmworkers (Mexicans), domestic workers (Caribbean/African): successive waves of non-White labor filling critical roles.
  • Today: highly skilled tech migrants (Indians, Chinese) and low-wage service/agriculture labor (Latinx, Africans, etc.) follow this pattern.

This model hasn't changed fundamentally, and that’s a valid observation: modern capitalist economies often outsource difficulty and cost to marginalized populations.




2. Can the Far-Right Reverse This Model?


Realistically, no, not in any complete or sustainable way. Here’s why:


  • Economic Dependency: Western economies are increasingly dependent on migrant labor not just for low-wage jobs but for STEM, healthcare, and eldercare. As birth rates fall and populations age, migrants are not optional—they’re essential.
  • Demographic Realities: White nationalist fantasies of "restoring a White ethnostate" run up against brutal demographic math: without migrants, sectors of the economy collapse. Japan is already a case study in the perils of a rigid, aging, ethnonationalist society—now reluctantly opening its doors to foreign labor.
  • Capitalist Interests Conflict with Nationalist Ones: Corporations want productivity and consumption. Nationalists want cultural homogeneity. The two agendas are often mutually exclusive. Historically, capital has always won.
  • State Power and Legitimacy: Even if you have ICE raids or border walls, you can’t build a modern economy by purging the people who make it run—from hospitals to farms to data centers.



3. The Crisis of the West: Gender, Class, and Collapse


Your point about gender relations, female autonomy, and declining fertility ties into broader concerns about social cohesion and reproduction. Many far-right thinkers do believe that female liberation = civilizational decline because it allegedly undermines the nuclear family and traditional roles. But this idea is:


  • Normatively regressive (in moral terms) and
  • Practically unworkable in liberal democracies.

There’s no serious political or military force capable (or willing) to “subjugate women” or roll back gender equality on a mass scale. Even in societies where these ideas are embraced (e.g. Taliban Afghanistan), the social and economic costs are catastrophic.




4. The Commodification of the "Third World Body"


You're absolutely right to observe that developed economies now view Third World migrants—particularly young, educated, and able-bodied ones—as resources akin to oil or lithium.


This commodification is:


  • Economically pragmatic (they are productive),
  • Ethically fraught (they are people, not resources), and
  • Politically destabilizing (native backlash fuels xenophobia).

Yet Western elites are unlikely to abandon this strategy. Migration is not just humanitarian or ideological—it’s economically vital in a world where machines can’t replace human bodies fast enough, especially in care work and interactive services.




5. Riots and Resistance: A Turning Point?


If ICE crackdowns under Trump-style regimes escalate, and protests swell, this may mark a flashpoint, not a reversal.


  • Mass mobilization suggests a limit to authoritarian anti-migrant policy.
  • The U.S. is not just a “White country” with a fading ideal—it is a racially mixed empire with contested identity.
  • Nationalist attempts to "cleanse" it face structural, demographic, and political limits.



Conclusion: The Trend is Larger Than Any Movement


White nationalists may have a cultural moment, but they are fighting against centuries of structural economic forces and an accelerating demographic trend. Even if far-right movements achieve localized successes, they cannot reverse the global dependency of the West on non-White labor and population.


The deeper problem is that the global order is unsustainable as is—but reversing to some imagined ethnopatriarchal past is neither viable nor desirable. The future may involve radical restructuring, but not through nationalist purging or gender re-subjugation. Those are reactionary fantasies, not functional blueprints.
 
Go outside & jump in front of a train like all the other faggots in your worthless shithole
Nope.
we'll get on h1b, steal your jobs and then touch your white foids with our brown cocku
 
advice to all indians Go outside & jump in front of a train like all the other faggots in your worthless shithole
 
hope west wake up and develop friendly raltion with china
i'm fine w/ China having their own interests secured in East Asia+SEA but that's about it

And to answer what you asked me, i think the whole tariff trade war thing is BS & should stop
 
i'm fine w/ China having their own interests secured in East Asia+SEA but that's about it

And to answer what you asked me, i think the whole tariff trade war thing is BS & should stop
china will take over washington in the 6th reich
 
sure rakesh, as if any of them want some curroid shitskin
that's the whole point.
They don't want you either but we are too low inhib to care and start harassing with our janitor rizz.
 
that's the whole point.
They don't want you either but we are too low inhib to care and start harassing with our janitor rizz.
tales from the Islamabad gay bar
Nicholas Cage Film GIF
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Paladin
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top