Correction. Humans prefer others of their own in-group.
Which is heavily racially centered.
I like how you didn't address the point of the article which was talking about facial-recognition, and had to bring this up:
Irish were treated like blacks when they first started immigrating to America. Ironically, it was the black community that showed them the most acceptance.
Incorrect, in fact:
During much of the nineteenth century, in areas with large Irish American and African American populations, the two groups were often pushed into conflict.
The Riot in Lexington Avenue
The Conscription Act of 1863 exacerbated tense relationships. This act made all white men between the ages of twenty and forty-five years eligible for the draft by the Union Army. Free African American men were permitted to "volunteer" to fight in the Civil War through the provisions of the Emancipation Proclamation. However, African American men were not drafted or otherwise forced to fight. In addition, white men with money could illegally bribe doctors for medical exemptions, legally hire a substitute, or pay for a commutation of a draft. The less affluent could not afford to pay for deferments. The inequities in draft eligibility between African Americans, monied whites, and working-class whites, of whom many were Irish, increased racial tensions.
Several cities suffered draft riots in which enrollment officers and free African Americans were targeted for violence. The largest such incident began on June 11, 1863, in New York City when more than 100 people were murdered by an angry mob. After burning down a draft office and attacking police officers and well-dressed whites, this mob of white workers, including many Irish Americans, focused its energy on killing African American bystanders.
Evidently, they faced direct competition for jobs in labor market with the blacks. Resentment and hatred resulted from competition which escalated racial tension between these two groups. The Irish immigrants took the blacks' jobs away since they were willing to work for less money. In addition, the blacks took over Irish jobs when they went on strike. As a result, ethnic violence and gang activities increased. Civil disobedience spread throughout New York City, and later on led to the outbreak of the Draft Riots.
eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu
From a literal Liberal/"pro black" source.
I'm going to sum up my thoughts about race. Just because an individual is born a certain race, does not give you the excuse to deprive the individual of basic human respect and acknowledgement.
As per my previous communication, I explained as to how I developed my views due to recognizing patterns in behavior amongst people & groups. I always treated everyone I met when I was younger correct & with respect, as I was told, yet found mistreatment from both those of my race & especially from non-whites.
I'm not trying to bait, most Hispanics for instance always were dishonest & backstabbed me, thus making my life worse.
I base most of my beliefs off of radical MRA theory.
Tribalistic behaviour is hatred of your fellow man no matter how you paint it.
Tribalism is merely a reaction to identifying with those who are most alike not just in appearance but characteristically & behaviorally, as well as due to the potential incompatibleness which certain groups have.
I don't care if any .is member of any ethnicity claims to be part of a superior race. I really don't.
I've never claimed that I myself am better than anyone here because of my race, and it's pretty stupid to do that here of all places.
I do, however, stand by my view Whites are objectively the best.
Calling other men, especially incel men, who are the most similar to you in all but skin colour
Race is more than skin-color jfl.
slurs that were said in a non-jokingly manner
Most of it is in a joking manner, or because they said something about JBW and/or made an anti-White statement
If I do use slurs towards a group, I am speaking of the normies of that group or it as a collective.
is hatred and completely contradictory to their claims that you love fellow ethnicels and even prefer them over white normies because you will never call them degretory racial slurs based solely of one's skin tone no matter how badly they disrespect you.
Why would I use a racial slur
as an insult towards someone who is literally the same race as me? Jfl, that claim made no sense.
I do use some kind of slur to refer to normies of my own race, but I can't use a racial one since there's no context for me to.
You also make highly insensitive posts like "nuke all of Africa" have you thought of all the incels living there???
Well, I see tons of ethnics deny & invalidate Whitecels experiences(I've never done this) whilst also see them blame "muh whitey" for everything, which is literal Redditor mentality. I also see them say the same thing as well in regards to Whites & White countries, not to mention I was being humorous.
Different groups vote differently because immigrants like to vote for those who will protect them.
Who also are more feminist on average, pro-LGBT, etc.
What does this have anything to do with what I mentioned?
I showed graphs showing immigration to Denmark from MENA countries was a net-negative, and the other one I shared showed that they make less impacts financially to society collectively.
My personal experience is the exact opposite. I got along best with curries and blacks.
Well, you aren't White, so therefore you cannot claim your experience would be similar to mine.
If I was rice, I'd want to be around other rices for sure.
And my experience has been the opposite: Non-Whites, mainly Blacks & Hispanics, have always been more difficult to associate with on average. Even under the same religious institutions, yes.
It's far easier to convince young men to kill other young men when you paint them as the enemy.
Whites are not facing "replacement"
We are jfl, everyone knows this is a pure fact. It's not even upon for debate, and I can't believe people on a site such as this of all places deny it.
Due to feminism, among other things: Whites, by default, also have been more k-selective which equates to less birth-rates.
Most non-Whites, except East Asians, are r-selective.
and import 3rd world workers because natives refuse to do dirty jobs.
They're imported, because companies are unregulated & are allowed to import workers who will work for lower-wages.
Trump promised to fix the immigration issue but he ended up deporting even fewer illegals than Obama
This is correct, yes.
However, under him legal immigration declines.
because western economy RELIES on underpaid manual labour.
Which is costly overall economically:
Also, check this article out:
The America First movement is gaining new momentum, in part because of the Biden administration’s blatant importation of new workers—and voters—across an open southern border. Ironically, after seeing how disastrous and unpopular this policy has been, Japan is about to implement its own version...
www.heritage.org
Wage suppression is the real reason why Japanese politicians are set to import 800,000 foreign workers. A flood of unskilled labor into a country reduces labor costs in the target industries, which reduces upward pressure on prices. That blunts the impact of inflation, but it’s only temporary.
Japan seems to have been listening to bureaucrats like Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell—and they’ve been taking notes. Mr. Powell recently explicitly said that the importation of low-paid unskilled workers has helped keep costs down, which reduces headline inflation numbers.
The problem with this Band-Aid is twofold. First, cutting wages is a rather inhumane solution to the problem of government spending and borrowing, and creating too much money.
Second, the apparent cost savings are only temporary since immigrants create just as many labor shortages as they solve. While unskilled immigrants provide labor for low-paying jobs, they increase shortages in other, often skilled jobs. Consider that immigrants also go to the dentist, their children need teachers, they use electricians, barbers, even police.
Thus, mass immigration of unskilled workers doesn’t solve an economy-wide labor shortage—but it certainly helps those businesses that employ lots of cheap labor.
Those are precisely the special interests who support mass immigration both here and in Japan, regardless of the fact that it is hollowing out the native-born working class in both places.
Over time, immigrants settle down and form their own communities,
Which as I shared in the source above, leads to lower social-trust & a weakened social fabric.
And in perhaps the most surprising result of all, levels of trust were not only lower between groups in more diverse settings, but even among members of the same group.
wcfia.harvard.edu
The housing crisis in Canada is so funny to me. >Sell houses with no limit >Houses sell out >blame immigrant buyers what??? You were literally selling them the goods and claim that they were at fault?
Canada has imported far too many for their healthcare & housing to sustain jfl, this is just a common fact.
It's a nation that funds it's expenditures by trading. I had part of my education there and there was little to no racial tension. Everybody with the exception of aging boomers got along.
Again, I said it's not a good example for various reasons.
Look at much larger-scale nations, such as Brazil or my country the US.
Glad to know you're also privileged enough to have gotten an education there though.
I'm accusing you of hatred and intolerance towards your fellow brocels on the basis of their skin pigmentation.
If they make a JBW claim and/or an anti-White statement ofc I will say something, I've never had an issue elsewise.
And race isn't just "muh skin tone" it has a lot to do with your genotype, phenotype, skull-structure, etc.
This topic is actually hotly debated because of these factors:
The environment which the child was raised in
Poverty and malnutrition in ethnic communities
Ethnic culture and expectations
Well, if you look at another stat I shared it showed that despite changes in the wealth-gap, SAT scores don't shift much.
Here's another:
Also, look at this:
The Roman Empire fell in 476 AD.
And it stood for around one-thousand years, even before the Empire as the Republic.
Point was, Europeans had many great civilizations before the past 500 years.
Vikings were more advanced than many give credit for, same with Celts especially.
more on this:
The graph only shows technological achievement from 1400 onwards.
Ok, and?
I showed it to highlight the sheer quality & quantity of them compared to other civilizations both other Whites & non-Whites had.
Byzantium fell in 1453 AD and it relied heavily on its European cousins for survival.
It stood as a test of time & had many cultural influences, though I personally am not a fan of it.
