
JestER
Clown World Analyst
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 13,666
We should, but other humans don't care about us, so why should we care about them?We're not machines, we should care about other humans.
We should, but other humans don't care about us, so why should we care about them?We're not machines, we should care about other humans.
I'm not sure tbh. Paying a whore to fuck her is cucked af but i understand that some guys are desesperate
Still better than ropingmore of us will spend time in jail, fighting or dying than actually raping
We should, but other humans don't care about us, so why should we care about them?
We're not machines, we should care about other humans.
You are literally going out of your way to prove my point that you can't argue based on logic, you come straight out of the box with some vague BS appeal to emotion statement that doesn't really mean anything
"Were not machines"
Here's my response to that
"Were not special either, were just animals who have the curse of self awareness and the gift of intelligence"
Saying were not machines doesn't really mean anything, us not being machines doesn't mean by default that we should "care about other humans", you seem to be skipping quite a few logical steps and replacing them with your assertions
Still better than roping
And just like that, you proved you are a fakecelI can retire to SEA and spend my years fucking 6+/10 asian bitches
We aren't animals either. We're too sapient to be animals. Us not being machines nor animals means we're sophisticated to grasp concepts of "kindness" and "cruelty."
And just like that, you proved you are a fakecel
Bruh... The more I see @FrothySolutions post, the more I think "he's" a foid larper or IT infiltrator. When hes talking about "humans" he really means foids. Fuck off you cuck.
You speak of the concepts as though they are separate from us, we didn't GRASP these concepts, WE CREATED THEM
They don't actually exist, its all in our heads, these concepts don't function like ACTUAL LAWS (gravity, thermodynamics, etc)
They are only as real as much as we enforce them
If I jump off of a tall building I will fall, nobody has to remind me about gravity for me to fall, nobody has to force me to fall, appeal to my emotions to make me fall, etc, I fall because GRAVITY ACTUALLY EXISTS (unlike the concepts and "moral laws" you speak of)
Either way, one should only adhere to those concepts if they are part of the social contract that imbues them with the benefits typical of adherence
Incels are not part of the social contract, there's no logical reason for us to adhere to any of these concepts
No. Not even in a traditional, healthy society, let alone in a modern western country.
I don't need anyone to teach me that hurting people is wrong
That's a conclusion we came to because it was self-evident that you owe it to people to be a certain level of good.
What do you mean when you say "wrong"?
You say nobody needs to teach you, and that statement shows how much self awareness you lack, because you were brought up in the society you exist in now, where YOU WERE IN FACT TAUGHT, you've just deluded yourself into thinking you are this special being who is inherently good, and no matter where you were born and which values were taught to you, you would JUST KNOW what is wrong and right
If you were raised in a cannibal tribe you'd eat humans without thinking about it
If you were raised among marauders and village raiders way back when raping a woman would be a normal thing to you
Whats "wrong" and "right" is subjective, they aren't absolutes
Nobody is owed anything
Of course I was taught things, but even as a boy I didn't need my parents to sit me down and tell me not to hit my sisters. I had empathy for my sisters. I knew what it felt like to be hit, and I didn't want that for people.
Empathy is not this deep special absolute thing like you are making it out to be, you have empathy because of your genes, you were born to have empathy, some people's genetics make it so that they can very easily not empathize at all
You think your feelings mean something because its you feeling them but they don't, the lack the ability to disconnect yourself from your experience as a human within your body and look at things objectively
Nothing you are saying deflects from my point, morality is subjective, if a simple difference in genetic makeup can make one person "empathetic" and another person a "sociopath" or "psychopath", then you are ironically arguing that people can be "born evil" or "born wrong" and others "born good" and "born right"
At that point why can't it be argued that Chad being attractive is a moral good, and being physically attractive is a moral trait, why stop at mental outcomes of genetics (lacking empathy), physical should matter too, so every Chad is more moral than you by default
The #1 reason why morality is subjective, IS BECAUSE IT IS DETERMINED BY BIOLOGY
Someone can literally just be born unable to feel the things you feel that make you a "good person", and its outside of their control just as much as their looks,
lonely single men must suffer for eternityI fail to comprehend why it's illegal to begin with.
Very tricky
One one hand it gives ugly dudes a chance at having sex
On the other hand it grants women more power and freedom![]()
JFL at even thinking a world without prostitution can exist.
Even the most conservative women possible use their bodies to catch the richest men they can before having kids. Wanting prostitution to be illegal is completely delusional
You can be born without hands. But you should be born with hands. That's healthy. That's the way you should be.
Because feminists are trying everything to ban men's sexuality to have more power over them with their holes.Can you elaborate![]()
The only chance we have of having sex should not be illegal in any way. For fuck sake.
Because feminists are trying everything to ban men's sexuality to have more power over them with their holes.
Agreed. The whole point of banning prostitution is to force men into traditional gender roles by making them rely up on a single partner. Women have already been allowed to abdicate their traditional gender roles so there's literally no reason to try to keep men in theirs. At this point the concept of a nuclear family is doomed, and whether or not prostitution is legalized will have no bearing on that unless women miraculously decide to 1950smaxx en large.If we lived in a perfect world where women knew their place, then prostitution wouldn't be necessary. Sadly, because of hypergamy, many men need that to cope
Yes and you can be born not being Chad, but it is optimal for every man to be born Chad just like it is optimal for every man to be born with hands, they'd be stronger and healthier, that's the way is should be, but that's not the way that it is
JFL at incels saying yes to this. For many incels prostitution is the only chance to try sex in this life. Seriously fuck off if you want to take this away. Cucked or not, it's a necessary evil.
You're not defective if you don't have that though.
No unless you ascendI mean is there any other way to sex other than having a girlfriend?
Nailed in first post.Yes because it is cucked. Every men should conquer females with pure brutality.
They are not humans, they are humanoids.When hes talking about "humans" he really means foids.
Just lol if you think humans are empathetic at all. Just see all the modern examples about how women want short men dead. Inb4 NAWALT. Nope, NAWALT is a bluepilled slippery slope:Empathy among humans is something unnatual, that only became natural to us, because we basically forced it into being, we bred ourselves into being empathetic
Also nice #rekt on that cuck Frothy.I’ve said this many times before, and as often as I can, especially to hammer into the heads of lurking bluepillers. So I’ll do it again.
when normie make NAWALT arguments like “just find a girl that likes short guys” or “soke girls are really shallow but u just gotta find one that’s not”..apart from the obvious psychological damage control they usually follow up these arguments with, like saying “bro if she rejected u cause ur not tall enough, she’s just shallow and she’s not even worth your time”, they’re making one extraordinary bold claim: that mate choice criteria varies within a species.
Mate choice criteria does NOT vary within a species.
find me one healthy female of one species Who regards the polar opposite of some attractive trait as attractive, and regards the opposite of it unattractive. like one human woman who exclusively loves short men, the shorter the better, and who regards tall men with the same vitriolic hatred and disgust that normal women regard short men with. Such a woman would be seen as mentally defective.
AFAIK no such example exists. The foid with the cripple boyfriend doesn’t count. There’s other psychological issues at work there, and even if there weren’t, notice how she became famous for her very unusual, divergent mate choice.. nobody would tune in if they were looksmatched. More likely than not, it’s just her method of advertising her fertility. Niche fertility advertisement. Gains orbiters and becomes visible to more chads.
The fundamentals of mate choice criteria do not vary. You’d have to re-engineer DNA at the phylum level to achieve that.
“b-but we’re all different unique specimens. God made us, we’re differen5 from animals, were in a category of our own. Natural laws stopped applying to us sometime in the last 50,000 years! Evolution stopped bro! We’re final form! We’re all spiritual and transcendental and shit now...” ... stfu ape while I drop some blackpill truthbombs on u
Nailed in first post.
JFL at the 78,9% of no. Youre basically supporting degeneracy, and giving whores a way to regulate their jobs and have a retirement. I thought this place was less cucked wtf![]()
Gigacope and donkey IQ. Of course foids want to be prostitutes because is the best way to earn money. How do you even call them woman? They are useless trash, cum receptacles. If you can't control your urges to cum in a roastie go ahead, but don't come here defending woman, is disgusting.Fuck off.
It's not like prostitution was something that all women could or would be willing to do.
And I doubt any of them enjoy doing it. So it's not like that would give them a great opportunity or something. Why do you think it's illegal in the first place ? Part of the reasons is that most women don't want to have to resort to that, ever. So to make sure this won't happen, they voted it illegal.
So you plan on dying without ever knowing what sex is ?Gigacope and donkey IQ. Of course foids want to be prostitutes because is the best way to earn money. How do you even call them woman? They are useless trash, cum receptacles. If you can't control your urges to cum in a roastie go ahead, but don't come here defending woman, is disgusting.
Whores want prostitution to be regulated so they are more safe and will get better conditions. And you want it too because you're a fucking cuck.
![]()
Whores want prostitution to be regulated so they are more safe and will get better conditions.