Title : tbh no, but needing to shit on us unattractive dudes for existing is malarkey. Then gaslight us to ur or er solely because of our looks is crazier
I
women are wrong all men should have sex.
ABSOLUTELY FUCKING YES
Don't be asking for others opinions on shits like this. Form your own opinion and stick to it.
well not even ugly foids that are supposed to be our looks match don't want us so over for truecels
Yes, because it has no evolutionary advantage to the species and it ruins society.
Ask yourself: Is civilization better or worse now that women have more options than ever? Are men sadder or happier now that women reject them for Chads? Is 1/3 of the young male population being sexless and lonely a good or a bad thing? Is humanity evolving with more Chads reproducing?
You know the answer to all of these questions. Don't pretend you don't.
Ask yourself: Is civilization better or worse now that women have more options than ever? Are men sadder or happier now that women reject them for Chads? Is 1/3 of the young male population being sexless and lonely a good or a bad thing? Is humanity evolving with more Chads reproducing?
You know the answer to all of these questions. Don't pretend you don't.
Agreed.
At this point I just want to be treated respectfully in school, work, and social situations. I fully understand tall white handsome-faced men will get the smiles and the favors, but the rudeness to me is infurirating.
Hypergamy is an issue yes however it’s natural icl chads are usually genetically superior as much as people want to cope. Not all chads but like plenty of them are maxxed out in every stat
8
I understand why they do it but i hate them because they are the main reason for my depression
this is always the correct answer
what bothers me specifically is foids going for guys who already have girlfriends, as well as their preference for thugs and criminals.
No.
Just like cows are not wrong for being "calf-only" regarding the purpose they ascribe their milky tits. Too bad I like butter, cheese, milk on my table.
Likewise we, Marxist-Rodgerists, can't care any less for whatever bestial instinct a cow or a foid has, whether it is to fuck bulls, Chads, donkeys, dogs, or to stuff poisonous tree trunks in her coochie ---- doesn't matter to us in any capacity whatsoever.
What matters is that we shall SEIZE THE MEANS OF REPRODUCTION and built a FOIDLESS SOCIETY where all foids are kept in a coma in underground breeding barns and tended by robot nurses, where no man ever enters. All sex is banned and young men have a State-assigned robot girlfriend (or replicant) in order to satisfy his genital urges until he is mature enough to raise his own son, incubated by an unseen Stacy several hundred meters underground and transmit his genes and his culture to a new generation of men who shall grow without ever being tortured by the sensually seductive yet odious whims of foids.
Nowadays over 90% of male energy is wasted trying to "game" the fried reward system of degenerated foids with consumerism, promises, grovelling and "self-improvement", because men live in a society wherein they are slave to the eternal cunt.
Enough! We, Marxist-Rodgerists preach that men shall own 100% of the fruits of their labor to use as they see fit --- to raise sons, to explore space, to leisurely lay in leisure... --- whatever! Men create EVERYTHING of any significant value that exists on this earth, and yet the foid consumes 80% of all resources produced in pursuit of endless frivolities such as clothes, nail polish, jewels, and other shiny shit to signal status to other foids. The remainder 20% is mostly consumed by men in pursuit of foids --- expensive cars, clothes, getaways, status symbols to trade for access to the cunt.
We are already in the dying throes of a fisherian runaway where men are ravaging the earth in search for resources to buy an ever more brief access to an ever more expensive cunt. If cunt-capitalism continues men shall strip Earth of all its resources in exchange for shiny shit to trade for yet another sterile copulation with a foid on BC pills.
But there is an alternative: Marxism-Rodgerism.
Last edited:
No they are programmed to seek the best genes for their offspring, cant be mad at simple biology
Why are we ugly then ? ( sub human women make subhuman babies )
It makes me feel resentful on some level, but logically I know you can't really blame them for their instinctual desires. It's just biology at the end of the day. However, I wish they would just be transparent about their desires and stop attempting to manipulate us. There's no need for them to act abusive or cruel to us. We also didn't choose to be incel.
Being an incel is basically a disability. Society should explore the idea of giving us welfare, legal protections and outlets (escorts and sex robots). That wouldn't solve all of our problems, but it would make our lives a lot easier.
Being an incel is basically a disability. Society should explore the idea of giving us welfare, legal protections and outlets (escorts and sex robots). That wouldn't solve all of our problems, but it would make our lives a lot easier.
Are women ever right
As people have said there’s no real advantage to having sex with a chad, especially if the Woman having sex with Chad is ugly you’re more likely to end up with a ugly kid due to the genetic recombination fucking him up.
As I always said, women can like whatever they want. I genuinely don't care.
Just wish they didn't step on the heads of the people that are the bottom of what they like. That's where the issue lies.
You like big dicks? Fine. Is there any point in shitting and belittling small dick men? No? So don't do it, and like what you like? Is that difficult to do?
Like tall men? Cool. Any point to shitting on and belittling manlets? No? Don't do it. Date tall men all you like. Leave manlets alone.
That's all I ask for.
But they are incapable of it.
Just wish they didn't step on the heads of the people that are the bottom of what they like. That's where the issue lies.
You like big dicks? Fine. Is there any point in shitting and belittling small dick men? No? So don't do it, and like what you like? Is that difficult to do?
Like tall men? Cool. Any point to shitting on and belittling manlets? No? Don't do it. Date tall men all you like. Leave manlets alone.
That's all I ask for.
But they are incapable of it.
Not all of them succeed at landing a chad ofc so they have to settle down on whatever they can find
G
I understand why they aren't even honest about it. Let's say women would collectively stop gaslighting and start to openly declare that they want chad only, even men who are very bluepilled will stop simping.
I have more anger towards all the people (male and female) who made female hypergamy and hoeflation possible and socially acceptable.
kys cuck fag
How bro
Baseado. I just became a marxist-rodgerist because of this post.
Yes, women are immoral for denying unattractive men love, sex, and intimacy while they give it all to attractive men, this is literally discrimination.
They all try to punch above their weight
This is mainly the issue
Yes, my past horrible experiences with them, their hypocrisy, and ostracization of sub5s to the point of suicide in the public, are what made them despicable.
Last edited:
Obviously yes, retard.
They should be mentally evolved enough to consider more options but alas they keep proving that they are not.
All the people who say no are faggots
This question shouldn’t exist, saying no is just pure clownery and advocating for feminist values like a pure cuck.
Similar threads
101%cel
Toxic Femininity
“Feminist” twist the idea of women being sexual selectors due to “Patriarchy” when this is really the case
- picklecel
- Inceldom Discussion
SubhumanOldcel
Users who are viewing this thread
