sultryloser
It's just bone, bro
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2023
- Posts
- 1,479
Please vote in the poll.
Personally, I don't believe in either of these. Chadfishes I take as evidence that being good with women, that phrase is code for being good looking to women. I don't believe in being good with women, because why do women not have to "be good" with men? They all sit atop a throne of SMV, they are all good looking to all men, and their contribution to courtship is saying yes or no (usually no).
I don't believe in social skills. If you don't have autism, it isn't hard to talk to other people. Most your conversations will be surface level and small talk that you will have forgotten about by tea time. Friendship isn't caused by having whatever is meant by social skills, it's caused by familiarity. The more time you spend with your buddy, the more you're going to know them, and provided you don't differ too greatly in worldview or sense of humor, you become friends. Since all children haven't formed a worldview in middle school and they spend a lot of time together, that's why friendships form in schools. I can't become friends with normies, because of worldview, being blackpilled, their cognitive dissonance and lack of self-awareness, it remains at small talk not because of "social skills". Social skills are being able to talk and make eye contact, or it's knowing what you can say without getting your head kicked in.
I made this thread because I was speaking to one of my friends, whom I became friends with because our desks were close together in school, and somehow women, relationships, etc were brought up, and this guy is redpilled from YouTube. He said these phrases "social skills" and "good with women". I was gritting my teeth until the subject was changed, but it did make me think about it again. (I am sure if it were not for the positioning of desks in a classroom, I wouldn't be friends with him. Our worldviews are too opposed to make it so today.)
I am alone with this philosophy that things around you are more vain than meets the eye?
Personally, I don't believe in either of these. Chadfishes I take as evidence that being good with women, that phrase is code for being good looking to women. I don't believe in being good with women, because why do women not have to "be good" with men? They all sit atop a throne of SMV, they are all good looking to all men, and their contribution to courtship is saying yes or no (usually no).
I don't believe in social skills. If you don't have autism, it isn't hard to talk to other people. Most your conversations will be surface level and small talk that you will have forgotten about by tea time. Friendship isn't caused by having whatever is meant by social skills, it's caused by familiarity. The more time you spend with your buddy, the more you're going to know them, and provided you don't differ too greatly in worldview or sense of humor, you become friends. Since all children haven't formed a worldview in middle school and they spend a lot of time together, that's why friendships form in schools. I can't become friends with normies, because of worldview, being blackpilled, their cognitive dissonance and lack of self-awareness, it remains at small talk not because of "social skills". Social skills are being able to talk and make eye contact, or it's knowing what you can say without getting your head kicked in.
I made this thread because I was speaking to one of my friends, whom I became friends with because our desks were close together in school, and somehow women, relationships, etc were brought up, and this guy is redpilled from YouTube. He said these phrases "social skills" and "good with women". I was gritting my teeth until the subject was changed, but it did make me think about it again. (I am sure if it were not for the positioning of desks in a classroom, I wouldn't be friends with him. Our worldviews are too opposed to make it so today.)
I am alone with this philosophy that things around you are more vain than meets the eye?