Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Displays of sexual attraction empower females and shame men

  • Thread starter Deleted member 20659
  • Start date
You are watching a movie in a cinema. Consider the following situations:
1) A hot actress appears seminude in a scene and groups of male friends in the audience whisper to each other how hot she is.
2) Chad takes off his shirt in a scene, and the females in the audience note to each other how attractive he is.

My theory is that both situations are bad for males; 1 happens more often, 2 happens more violently, 1 empowers women, 2 shames men, and 2 is increasingly normalized. It seems to make sense when you take hypergamy into account.

I began thinking about this because of something that happened to me, I was watching a movie in earlier this week and there's a scene in which a famous chad actor takes his shirt off. The females went insane, started talking to each other loudly during the movie and some started taking pictures with their cellphones (with flash even), this went on for minutes, the situation did strike me as aggressive and exaggerated. I wouldn't conceive of this happening the other way around, guys interrupting a movie because of a hot actress. I feel ashamed and inadequate when this type of thing happens, and imagine the other guys present in these situations feel similar.

Situations like 1 are common and females are sexualized in media more often than men, but I think the purpose is simply to explore our visually oriented brains to capture our attention, and females don't seem to feel as ashamed when it happens, but actually feel empowered by it because they know they aren't excluded from these displays of male sexual attraction, as males aren't hypergamous - in other words, they know men are capable of being attracted to them in approximately the same degree as they are to the sexualized female in the screen. So whenever men show to be attracted to some hot female like in situation 1, they are simply displaying/training/engaging in their willingness to value, desire and direct attention to female sexually in general, and this is empowering to women (this would explain stuff like "not watching porn is misogynistic" or the hatred directed at volcels, in both cases males aren't willing to participate in the sexualization of females and thus in their empowerment). When males are sexualized in media, on the other hand, something different seems to be going on, females seem to use it as an opportunity to assert themselves sexually (this would explain why they do it so loudly, publicly) over males around them, by implictly contrasting them to the hypergamous ideal (chad) they fall short of. In the violence of these moments, in the loud, aggressive, surprising displays of sexual desire from the part of females towards chad, we are reminded that women are physically incapable of being attracted to us, the average or low status guy, at any meaningful, genuine, significant degree.

Also there might be something to be said about how situations such as 2 are becoming increasingly normalized or even institutionalized. For example I've had female teachers say in front of a class how some male actor or famous chad is hot, and have all the female students agree enthusiastically, but if it was the other way around (a male teacher) it would probably sound creepy. Also the mainstream success of books or movies like Fifty Shades of Grey might be an example of this.

TLDR; Females like it when men sexualize other females because it shows that they are subordinated to female sexuality in general, and also use the public sexualization of chads in entertainment or media to shame men as inadequate. Thus any displays of the male attraction to females, or of the female attraction to chads, benefits females and shames men, and these situations are becoming increasingly common and explicit.

Toughts?
 
Everything that doesn't directly link back to incels is an enemy of us, attraction is definitely one of them, but let's say for one weird reason an incel tries to become a model, I will support him even though it doesn't make sense.
 
Very high IQ. Only women and the highest ranking men benefit from the culture of hypersexualization and oversocialization present in all westernized countries. Pretty much every aspect of this culture is structured so as to serve the interest of women and their desired mates at the expense of the rest of the male population. Marriage and family law, the education system, the labor system, and the entertainment and news industry are the most obvious examples. Subchad men, but especially incels, aren't given due consideration.
 
1) A hot actress appears seminude in a scene and groups of male friends in the audience whisper to each other how hot she is.

I always hated it. It is now happening on a frequent level, regardless if it is a series, a movie or in anime and manga, it is everywhere now.
 
Too high IQ and confusing for me to understand
 
The mass media and social media have normalized the chad look. Even though it's not a common phenotype.

Nowadays, every foid expects all men to look like chad. If you dont look like Chad, you not seen as a real male.

400-500 years ago, it was very difficult for the average peasent foid to meet a chad. Most were in the royal houses with high tier foids, creating the new generation of rulers.

The second class foids would reproduce with lower class males, creating a second class citizen.

Once every 10 or 20 years, whenever the lower males were getting the upper hand numerically. chads from different nations would wage war against each other so to cull their second and and third class citizens

This was all fine and dandy because its biology. The issue now is that chads are mating with second and third class foids, leaving a vaccum for natural leaders, which politicians are filling up. These politicians arent born to be leaders, they achieve this power by being demagogues and populists.they pander to feminists, cucks, soyboys, etc because they're the mass that puts them in power.

They're more worried about stuffing their pockets with shekels than making great nations.


This is what is happening as we speak
 
Last edited:
Very high IQ. Only women and the highest ranking men benefit from the culture of hypersexualization and oversocialization present in all westernized countries. Pretty much every aspect of this culture is structured so as to serve the interest of women and their desired mates at the expense of the rest of the male population. Marriage and family law, the education system, the labor system, and the entertainment and news industry are the most obvious examples. Subchad men, but especially incels, aren't given due consideration.
I think your ability to make posts like this one is evidence contrary to your assertion that you are low IQ.
 
I would like you to commend you on your high IQ post, this is something I never really thought about tbh.
 

Similar threads

Top Red Garnacho
Replies
2
Views
146
yot123
Y
Zer0/∞
Replies
33
Views
946
Uncle Death
Uncle Death
gymletethnicel
Replies
20
Views
283
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
brazi
Replies
6
Views
226
brazi
brazi
canwefixit
Replies
4
Views
184
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top