Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Did your ancestors kill or enslave jews?

  • Thread starter Small Balls Messiah
  • Start date

Did your ancestors kill or enslave jews?


  • Total voters
    20
Small Balls Messiah

Small Balls Messiah

Cunny World Order
★★
Joined
Dec 29, 2024
Posts
4,683
Online time
1d 22h
Just asking since us Assyrians were among the first to do so.
 
Yes, Romans did it also

@PersonalityChad

Anglo ancestors expelled them many times also
 
My ancestors didn't do shit.
 
25697   SoyBooru
 
have a friend who's grandpa quite literally was a nazi like an actual nazi lmfao, other than that no
 
have a friend who's grandpa quite literally was a nazi like an actual nazi lmfao, other than that no
Based, i've known a few online & even one or two people irl whose ancestors fought for the Reich

Sieg Heil
 
Based, i've known a few online & even one or two people irl whose ancestors fought for the Reich

Sieg Heil
gramps would be rolling in his grave seeing his niece become a bisexual, coal burning slut
 
gramps would be rolling in his grave seeing his niece become a bisexual, coal burning slut
Sounds like a real whore. All foids are bisexual, she just admits it.
 
if you have ancestry from Europe or the Near East then it's probably an automatic yes
 
if you have ancestry from Europe or the Near East then it's probably an automatic yes
If you have ancestry from anywhere thats not jewish to be honest :feelskek::smonk:
 
I have no idea, there aren’t many Jews in the orient
 

The Guangzhou massacre was a massacre of the inhabitants of the prosperous port city of Guangzhou in 878–879 by the rebel army of Huang Chao. Arab sources indicate that foreign victims, including Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians, numbered in tens of thousands based on Chinese records of prior inhabitants.[1][2][3] Two travellers from the Abbasid Caliphate, Abu Zaid al Hassan from Siraf writing decades afterwards, and al-Masudi writing in the 10th century, estimated that 120,000 or 200,000 foreigners were killed respectively, but according to Morris Rossabi, the numbers were inflated.[4]

he was succeeded by Huang Chao, a failed examination candidate from a wealthy salt trading family.
 
Last edited:
over for celtic cels.

There is no historical record of the Celtic peoples as a cultural or ethnic group ever expelling Jews in the way that, for example, medieval England (1290) or Spain (1492) did under centralized monarchies.


Here’s some context:


  • The Celts were not a single unified nation but a collection of tribal societies spread across Europe—most notably in what are now Ireland, Scotland, Wales, France (Gaul), and parts of Central Europe. They did not have unified governments or policies capable of carrying out coordinated expulsions like later kingdoms did.
  • Jewish communities in ancient or medieval Celtic regions were small or nonexistent for much of history. For example:
    • Ireland and Scotland had little to no significant Jewish population until modern times.
    • Roman Gaul (modern France), where some Celts lived under Roman rule, had Jewish populations in cities like Marseille, but these were generally under Roman or later Frankish (not Celtic) political control.
  • Anti-Jewish expulsions in Europe were typically enacted by centralized Christian monarchies or church authorities, often under economic, religious, or political pretexts. These happened mainly in the High to Late Middle Ages.

In short: No, the Celtic peoples as a group did not expel Jews. There’s no record of such actions, and such expulsions required centralized political systems the tribal Celts didn’t have.
 
He embraced those expelled from Europe :feelspuke:
 
Since most of my ancestry comes from Eastern Europe it's a very high likelihood that they both killed and expelled them multiple times. Hell, I'm sure they didn't even kill them because they where jews but just because all Eastern Euros are psychos who are hell bent on genociding each other.
 
i don't know, its unlikely because my ancestors were jews, or so i was told by my father.

i hope that one of my ancestors killed and enslaved jews and took a jewess as his breeding slave.
 
Since you're Mexican, you likely have Sephardic Jewish roots in you, as the Iberians sent a lot of them to colonize the new world
I’ve actually been saying this for awhile, my paternal grandmother is of Sephardic descent, and grandfather is just a castizo. My grandma from my maternal side is more Aztec/indingenous and grandfather is mestizo.

I unfortunately inherited a majority of the Aztec genes and the only thing I got from euro side of the admixture was balding and a god awful patchy beard that grows like pubic hair.

The only good thing I inherited was height and frame. Moms 5”7 and dads 5”9.

No jewish money though unfortunately, my family is lower middle class. All I know is that my paternal grandmother is related to some navy captain from spain that moved to Monterey, something like that.
 
I’ve actually been saying this for awhile, my paternal grandmother is of Sephardic descent, and grandfather is just a castizo. My grandma from my maternal side is more Aztec/indingenous and grandfather is mestizo.

I unfortunately inherited a majority of the Aztec genes
yeah that's how it always is
and the only thing I got from euro side of the admixture was balding and a god awful patchy beard that grows like pubic hair.
I got the worst traits of all the Euro groups i'm mixed with:
-Celtic+med balding
-Celtic+Med manletism
-Alpine+Dinarid eye-area
-Anglo high forehead+hairline
etc.
No jewish money though unfortunately, my family is lower middle class. All I know is that my paternal grandmother is related to some navy captain from spain that moved to Monterey, something like that.
Interesting, as you know i'm big into population genetics n' sheit due to learning my family history

I might do a thread on this showing what i've found, I managed to trace my English side back to the 1600s based on some records

We even have the village & county they were from.

I also found(well i think because the records can be kind inconsistent) one of my male ancestors married some foid descendant of one of the founders of Hartford, Connecticut
Also btw are you sicillian?
I can see why'd you think that but how would it change anything?
Zased
 
yeah that's how it always is
Sadly.
I got the worst traits of all the Euro groups i'm mixed with:
-Celtic+med balding
-Celtic+Med manletism
-Alpine+Dinarid eye-area
-Anglo high forehead+hairline
etc.
I knew a foid classmate who had that “Anglo-high forehead” that’s very brutal man.

My hairline is a U shaped one( I don’t know what to name since I’m not very knowledgeable with genetics) and the top is thinning, currently at a NW3 right now. Looking my both of my grandfathers, they both have hair on the sides but missing on top.

Eyes are almond shaped but the upper eye lid is more exposed. And I have a wide forehead.
Interesting, as you know i'm big into population genetics n' sheit due to learning my family history

I might do a thread on this showing what i've found, I managed to trace my English side back to the 1600s based on some records

We even have the village & county they were from.

I also found(well i think because the records can be kind inconsistent) one of my male ancestors married some foid descendant of one of the founders of Hartford, Connecticut
That’s pretty cool, I could only trace my maternal families up until like the 1800s? I believe? Since the churches started taking records of births around that time.

My Jewish grandmother from my paternal side I could probably go back as far as the 1000s since the captain that she’s related to, was apart of some royal family (I can’t remember which one exactly)and when the whole colonization happened, the captain and his royal family settled in Monterrey, Mexico. Obviously they were crypto-Jews no doubt.

And as for my castizo grandfather, the 1400s is as far as I can go back to.
I can see why'd you think that but how would it change anything?

I’m curious whether he was a northern or southern Italian (Icorrect me if I’m wrong) I think the more south the more brown they are, no?( and I’m mean what Europe was before it hit its current state with the influx of Arab immigration)

Aren’t brown Italians called “wops”?
 
Sadly.

I knew a foid classmate who had that “Anglo-high forehead” that’s very brutal man.
Yeah it is, anglos do have ok lower-thirds which i got at least

Most users here said that wearing a mask during COVID made them get treated better, but for me it was the opposite.
My hairline is a U shaped one( I don’t know what to name since I’m not very knowledgeable with genetics) and the top is thinning, currently at a NW3 right now. Looking my both of my grandfathers, they both have hair on the sides but missing on top.
NW3 here & mine is kinda a widows peak, same as both my grandpas:feelsrope:
Eyes are almond shaped but the upper eye lid is more exposed. And I have a wide forehead.
Yeah i have a wide forehead, my eye area is kind of a mix of these types:


That’s pretty cool, I could only trace my maternal families up until like the 1800s? I believe? Since the churches started taking records of births around that time.
England was different, they had a very good system which the Normans helped refine
And as for my castizo grandfather, the 1400s is as far as I can go back to.
Nice
I’m curious whether he was a northern or southern Italian (Icorrect me if I’m wrong) I think the more south the more brown they are, no?
"brown" is such a vague & dumb concept tbh. Though yes, many of them can get an "olive" complex which in the summer is tanned or a light brown but in winter is "ghoulish"

Look at this:

pone.0048294.t001.PNG_L


This measures skin-tone, most of Southern Europe is about the same or slightly off than the rest.
( and I’m mean what Europe was before it hit its current state with the influx of Arab immigration)
South has more immigrants, also has always had some Jew-Gypsy communities iirc

Also to clarify, European/White DNA has remained mostly the same since it was "formed" in the early-middle bronze age when Anatolian Farmers mixed with HG to form "Early European Farmer" and then mixed with Steppe-Yamnaya

A 2013 study by Peristera Paschou et al. confirms that the Mediterranean Sea has acted as a strong barrier to gene flow through geographic isolation following initial settlements. Samples from (Northern) Italy, Tuscany, Sicily and Sardinia are closest to other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece, who are in turn closest to the Neolithic migrants that spread farming throughout Europe, represented here by the Cappadocian sample from Anatolia. But there hasn't been any significant admixture from the Middle East or North Africa into Italy and the rest of Southern Europe since then
The only important gene flows from Near East to Europe must have occurred in prehistoric times and, as genetic evidence suggests, the most prominent migrations should have occurred during the Neolithic.
Basically, neolithic farmers spread into Europe but didn't mix as much with the Steppe in the South & Balkans. Some swarthoid ones & ones with MENA phenos do exist, but that's just due to shared DNA from history.
Aren’t brown Italians called “wops”?
>Brown
>Italian

Pick one.

It's not really you, but many "ethnics" on .is seem to have an obsession with Southern Europeans & them being "brown" because of the olive complex I spoke of above & because some MENA-passing ones exist. I've never understood why many here obsess over them to this degree; i've also been in tons of WN spaces & like 99% agree Italians are White.

I've met tons of ones in the US, both with some mixed(as in other White/Euro) or full-blooded roots. They were White just darker hair & got a tan over summer ofc.

The term also had nothing with skin-tone when i looked it up, i think it just means someone who is "poor" or "low class"
 
People seem to forget that Romania was on place three in terms of Jew killing. Our north-east particularly was full of them, emphasis on was. What the shit fascists couldn't finish the communists did. The commies actually sold Jews to Israel striking a profit from the freedom of these people.

Imagine being so stereotypically Jewish that you have a monetary gain out of ridding a nation of an ethnic group. We outjewed the jews.
 
1290 my English side kicked them out
 
Yeah it is, anglos do have ok lower-thirds which i got at least

Most users here said that wearing a mask during COVID made them get treated better, but for me it was the opposite.
My eyes are pretty asymmetrical, plus the whole upper eyelid exposure doesn’t help either. So i got treated the same nonetheless.
NW3 here & mine is kinda a widows peak, same as both my grandpas:feelsrope:
Fucking sucks we both had to start balding at an early age.:feelsrope::feelsrope:
Yeah i have a wide forehead, my eye area is kind of a mix of these types:



England was different, they had a very good system which the Normans helped refine

Nice

Ah,I see.
"brown" is such a vague & dumb concept tbh. Though yes, many of them can get an "olive" complex which in the summer is tanned or a light brown but in winter is "ghoulish"

Look at this:

pone.0048294.t001.PNG_L


This measures skin-tone, most of Southern Europe is about the same or slightly off than the rest.

South has more immigrants, also has always had some Jew-Gypsy communities iirc

Also to clarify, European/White DNA has remained mostly the same since it was "formed" in the early-middle bronze age when Anatolian Farmers mixed with HG to form "Early European Farmer" and then mixed with Steppe-Yamnaya

Oh okay, forgive my lack of knowledge on this topic. I’d always thought since both spain and Sicily were conquered by “moors”, I would’ve thought they would’ve been more mixed with northern African traits rather than the upper Northern European traits.

And also considering that early 20th Century America didn’t really see Italians as “white” or saw them as less “white” than other European groups, socially ofc.
Basically, neolithic farmers spread into Europe but didn't mix as much with the Steppe in the South & Balkans. Some swarthoid ones & ones with MENA phenos do exist, but that's just due to shared DNA from history.
I see, yeah I understand it now, thank you for this info.
>Brown
>Italian

Pick one.
It's not really you, but many "ethnics" on .is seem to have an obsession with Southern Europeans & them being "brown" because of the olive complex I spoke of above & because some MENA-passing ones exist. I've never understood why many here obsess over them to this degree; i've also been in tons of WN spaces & like 99% agree Italians are White.
Like I said, I would’ve thought they would’ve been seen as “brown” because of the moors invading both Spain and Sicily and possibly race mixing with the locals there.
I've met tons of ones in the US, both with some mixed(as in other White/Euro) or full-blooded roots. They were White just darker hair & got a tan over summer ofc.
Right, okay I see.
The term also had nothing with skin-tone when i looked it up, i think it just means someone who is "poor" or "low class"
yeah disregard this one lol, I thought it was a racial slur.

Also, sorry for the late response, I’ve been playing black souls a lot(the avi is a character from that game) and I’ve been really hooked on it right now.
 
My eyes are pretty asymmetrical, plus the whole upper eyelid exposure doesn’t help either. So i got treated the same nonetheless.
brutal, my eyes are symmetrical
Fucking sucks we both had to start balding at an early age.:feelsrope::feelsrope:
Ye
Oh okay, forgive my lack of knowledge on this topic.
No worries, that's why i said that "not so much you" but I feel a lot of ethnics on here like to talk about this to try & project onto Whites who have that "olive" complex & darker hair or eyes since colorism is more common in your cultures, or just to drag others down.

It's mainly Curries in all fairness
I’d always thought since both spain and Sicily were conquered by “moors”,
"Moor" wasn't really assigned to a race, but most were MENA

Also, the same argument can be made that when Rome & Greece controlled these, they got "Whitened" also:feelsthink:
I would’ve thought they would’ve been more mixed with northern African traits rather than the upper Northern European traits.
Nah, they're just "Med" which is a subgroup of European/White.

And if so, why don't they have any Nigger traits which most North Africans do?:waitwhat:

And how about all the Spanish conquistadors who many claim "JBWmaxxed"
And also considering that early 20th Century America didn’t really see Italians as “white” or saw them as less “white” than other European groups, socially ofc.
They were seen on the same level as Irish & Slavs, even Germans were looked-down upon: In fact, many Germans to the US were South Germans who are more "Alpine" phenotype wise as I showed, which is more "darker" and guess who even stated this:

“[T]he Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted.”

Read this also:

Does all this mean, as Prof. Roediger suggests, that the old stock did not think the new immigrants were white? The language, religion, appearance, and bathing habits of the newcomers combined to make them alien and even repulsive, but sending a few Sicilians to black schools hardly meant people in the South thought they were actually Negroes. Protestants of British stock did not want to mix with short, dark Catholics, and it was convenient to park them in black schools, and the abortive 1922 anti-miscegenation prosecution is at best a historical curiosity.

As even Prof. Roediger himself recognizes, naturalization laws throughout this period specified that citizenship was open to “free white persons,” and no one ever argued that “Guineas” and “Bohunks” were unqualified. Other races were. In 1922, the Supreme Court ruled that Japanese could not naturalize because they were not white. The next year, a subcontinental Indian came before the court, claiming he was “Caucasian,” and therefore eligible. In earlier cases, the court had sought expert testimony from anthropologists as to who was white, but in the Thind case, the justices ruled that it was simple common sense not to consider Indians white. New immigrants from Europe were unfailingly admitted to citizenship.

The census bureau during this period counted new immigrants the same way. It classified the first generation and their children as “foreign-born white,” but counted the third generation simply as white. This reflected both scholarly and popular assumptions. As a 1932 study by Donald Young called American Minority People noted of the new immigrant, it was “dimly realized that in a few generations he will be absorbed into the total white population.” Young went on to say that the “white immigrant [is] patently handicapped by foreign language and tradition” but the “Negro now is looked on as more of a biological problem.”
Basically, they never saw them as "non white" but just lower than them & knew they would assimilate


I see, yeah I understand it now, thank you for this info.
Yeah, i shared some more below
Like I said, I would’ve thought they would’ve been seen as “brown” because of the moors invading both Spain and Sicily and possibly race mixing with the locals there.
They did mix a bit, but from what i showed, most of them were taken-back to MENA countries after expulsion

Also, most "moors" were actually converts to Islam, with a small minority of elite rules.
Right, okay I see.
Ye, also look at this:

In historical times, there have been three major invasions of South Eastern Europe from the direction of the Near East but no evidence of major migratory events and gene flow.

Although the Southeastern Mediterranean islands seem to have acted as a bridge from Anatolia to Southern Europe, the relatively small degree of gene flow between the African and the European coasts shows that the Mediterranean Sea also had a barrier function as also suggested with studies of mtDNA polymorphisms (48). Thus, the Mediterranean seems to have facilitated the migrations of Neolithic farmers along its Southern European coast but it mostly acted as an isolating factor between its European and African coasts.

The only important gene flows from Near East to Europe must have occurred in prehistoric times and, as genetic evidence suggests, the most prominent migrations should have occurred during the Neolithic.

Basically, this is how Europeans were formed- they're a mix of this with Steppe/Yamnaya
Main qimg 069e0926f82ff07864a46b85c7afdd17


You also see while S. Euros are a bit drifted, they're more in a cluster with other Europeans.

pnas.1320811111fig01.jpg


Look at the graphs here, they're very far from N/ Africa & even Levantines & form their own cluster closer to other Euros, aside from some Island Greeks like Crete.
yeah disregard this one lol, I thought it was a racial slur.
I mean in a way yeah but it has roots to do with them being poor as fuck
Also, sorry for the late response, I’ve been playing black souls a lot(the avi is a character from that game) and I’ve been really hooked on it right now.
Nah no worries mang, i need to find some new copes tbh
 
Last edited:
It's a good idea though
 

Similar threads

Shrek 2
Replies
15
Views
598
Lo3e
Lo3e
Lo3e
Replies
29
Views
2K
tulasdanslos
tulasdanslos
parbate2025
Replies
15
Views
900
stsaturn
stsaturn
Shark
Replies
23
Views
750
SewerGoat
SewerGoat
T
Replies
32
Views
1K
DISASTER
DISASTER

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top