Small Balls Messiah
Cunny World Order
★★
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2024
- Posts
- 4,683
- Online time
- 1d 22h
Just asking since us Assyrians were among the first to do so.
The fuck is your postcount?! how?!
Based, i've known a few online & even one or two people irl whose ancestors fought for the Reichhave a friend who's grandpa quite literally was a nazi like an actual nazi lmfao, other than that no
gramps would be rolling in his grave seeing his niece become a bisexual, coal burning slutBased, i've known a few online & even one or two people irl whose ancestors fought for the Reich
Sieg Heil
Sounds like a real whore. All foids are bisexual, she just admits it.gramps would be rolling in his grave seeing his niece become a bisexual, coal burning slut
Brutalgramps would be rolling in his grave seeing his niece become a bisexual, coal burning slut
If you have ancestry from anywhere thats not jewish to be honestif you have ancestry from Europe or the Near East then it's probably an automatic yes
Yes, Romans did it also
@PersonalityChad
Anglo ancestors expelled them many times also
Because he adds nothing of value to any discussionThe fuck is your postcount?! how?!
none of them I thinkJust asking since us Assyrians were among the first to do so.
Spanish empire kicked out jewsJust asking since us Assyrians were among the first to do so.
Since you're Mexican, you likely have Sephardic Jewish roots in you, as the Iberians sent a lot of them to colonize the new world
I’ve actually been saying this for awhile, my paternal grandmother is of Sephardic descent, and grandfather is just a castizo. My grandma from my maternal side is more Aztec/indingenous and grandfather is mestizo.Since you're Mexican, you likely have Sephardic Jewish roots in you, as the Iberians sent a lot of them to colonize the new world
Also btw are you sicillian?Lifefuel
I'm southern Italian and let's leave it at thatAlso btw are you sicillian?
I'm southern Italian and let's leave it at that![]()
yeah that's how it always isI’ve actually been saying this for awhile, my paternal grandmother is of Sephardic descent, and grandfather is just a castizo. My grandma from my maternal side is more Aztec/indingenous and grandfather is mestizo.
I unfortunately inherited a majority of the Aztec genes
I got the worst traits of all the Euro groups i'm mixed with:and the only thing I got from euro side of the admixture was balding and a god awful patchy beard that grows like pubic hair.
Interesting, as you know i'm big into population genetics n' sheit due to learning my family historyNo jewish money though unfortunately, my family is lower middle class. All I know is that my paternal grandmother is related to some navy captain from spain that moved to Monterey, something like that.
I can see why'd you think that but how would it change anything?Also btw are you sicillian?
Zased
Sadly.yeah that's how it always is
I knew a foid classmate who had that “Anglo-high forehead” that’s very brutal man.I got the worst traits of all the Euro groups i'm mixed with:
-Celtic+med balding
-Celtic+Med manletism
-Alpine+Dinarid eye-area
-Anglo high forehead+hairline
etc.
That’s pretty cool, I could only trace my maternal families up until like the 1800s? I believe? Since the churches started taking records of births around that time.Interesting, as you know i'm big into population genetics n' sheit due to learning my family history
I might do a thread on this showing what i've found, I managed to trace my English side back to the 1600s based on some records
We even have the village & county they were from.
I also found(well i think because the records can be kind inconsistent) one of my male ancestors married some foid descendant of one of the founders of Hartford, Connecticut
I can see why'd you think that but how would it change anything?
Yeah it is, anglos do have ok lower-thirds which i got at leastSadly.
I knew a foid classmate who had that “Anglo-high forehead” that’s very brutal man.
NW3 here & mine is kinda a widows peak, same as both my grandpasMy hairline is a U shaped one( I don’t know what to name since I’m not very knowledgeable with genetics) and the top is thinning, currently at a NW3 right now. Looking my both of my grandfathers, they both have hair on the sides but missing on top.
Yeah i have a wide forehead, my eye area is kind of a mix of these types:Eyes are almond shaped but the upper eye lid is more exposed. And I have a wide forehead.
England was different, they had a very good system which the Normans helped refineThat’s pretty cool, I could only trace my maternal families up until like the 1800s? I believe? Since the churches started taking records of births around that time.
NiceAnd as for my castizo grandfather, the 1400s is as far as I can go back to.
"brown" is such a vague & dumb concept tbh. Though yes, many of them can get an "olive" complex which in the summer is tanned or a light brown but in winter is "ghoulish"I’m curious whether he was a northern or southern Italian (Icorrect me if I’m wrong) I think the more south the more brown they are, no?
South has more immigrants, also has always had some Jew-Gypsy communities iirc( and I’m mean what Europe was before it hit its current state with the influx of Arab immigration)
A 2013 study by Peristera Paschou et al. confirms that the Mediterranean Sea has acted as a strong barrier to gene flow through geographic isolation following initial settlements. Samples from (Northern) Italy, Tuscany, Sicily and Sardinia are closest to other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece, who are in turn closest to the Neolithic migrants that spread farming throughout Europe, represented here by the Cappadocian sample from Anatolia. But there hasn't been any significant admixture from the Middle East or North Africa into Italy and the rest of Southern Europe since then
Basically, neolithic farmers spread into Europe but didn't mix as much with the Steppe in the South & Balkans. Some swarthoid ones & ones with MENA phenos do exist, but that's just due to shared DNA from history.The only important gene flows from Near East to Europe must have occurred in prehistoric times and, as genetic evidence suggests, the most prominent migrations should have occurred during the Neolithic.
>BrownAren’t brown Italians called “wops”?
My eyes are pretty asymmetrical, plus the whole upper eyelid exposure doesn’t help either. So i got treated the same nonetheless.Yeah it is, anglos do have ok lower-thirds which i got at least
Most users here said that wearing a mask during COVID made them get treated better, but for me it was the opposite.
Fucking sucks we both had to start balding at an early age.NW3 here & mine is kinda a widows peak, same as both my grandpas![]()
Yeah i have a wide forehead, my eye area is kind of a mix of these types:
England was different, they had a very good system which the Normans helped refine
Nice
"brown" is such a vague & dumb concept tbh. Though yes, many of them can get an "olive" complex which in the summer is tanned or a light brown but in winter is "ghoulish"
Look at this:
![]()
![]()
Genome-Wide Association Studies of Quantitatively Measured Skin, Hair, and Eye Pigmentation in Four European Populations
Pigmentation of the skin, hair, and eyes varies both within and between human populations. Identifying the genes and alleles underlying this variation has been the goal of many candidate gene and several genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most GWAS for pigmentary traits to date have been...journals.plos.org
This measures skin-tone, most of Southern Europe is about the same or slightly off than the rest.
South has more immigrants, also has always had some Jew-Gypsy communities iirc
Also to clarify, European/White DNA has remained mostly the same since it was "formed" in the early-middle bronze age when Anatolian Farmers mixed with HG to form "Early European Farmer" and then mixed with Steppe-Yamnaya
I see, yeah I understand it now, thank you for this info.Basically, neolithic farmers spread into Europe but didn't mix as much with the Steppe in the South & Balkans. Some swarthoid ones & ones with MENA phenos do exist, but that's just due to shared DNA from history.
>Brown
>Italian
Pick one.
Like I said, I would’ve thought they would’ve been seen as “brown” because of the moors invading both Spain and Sicily and possibly race mixing with the locals there.It's not really you, but many "ethnics" on .is seem to have an obsession with Southern Europeans & them being "brown" because of the olive complex I spoke of above & because some MENA-passing ones exist. I've never understood why many here obsess over them to this degree; i've also been in tons of WN spaces & like 99% agree Italians are White.
Right, okay I see.I've met tons of ones in the US, both with some mixed(as in other White/Euro) or full-blooded roots. They were White just darker hair & got a tan over summer ofc.
yeah disregard this one lol, I thought it was a racial slur.The term also had nothing with skin-tone when i looked it up, i think it just means someone who is "poor" or "low class"
brutal, my eyes are symmetricalMy eyes are pretty asymmetrical, plus the whole upper eyelid exposure doesn’t help either. So i got treated the same nonetheless.
YeFucking sucks we both had to start balding at an early age.![]()
No worries, that's why i said that "not so much you" but I feel a lot of ethnics on here like to talk about this to try & project onto Whites who have that "olive" complex & darker hair or eyes since colorism is more common in your cultures, or just to drag others down.Oh okay, forgive my lack of knowledge on this topic.
"Moor" wasn't really assigned to a race, but most were MENAI’d always thought since both spain and Sicily were conquered by “moors”,
Nah, they're just "Med" which is a subgroup of European/White.I would’ve thought they would’ve been more mixed with northern African traits rather than the upper Northern European traits.
They were seen on the same level as Irish & Slavs, even Germans were looked-down upon: In fact, many Germans to the US were South Germans who are more "Alpine" phenotype wise as I showed, which is more "darker" and guess who even stated this:And also considering that early 20th Century America didn’t really see Italians as “white” or saw them as less “white” than other European groups, socially ofc.
“[T]he Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted.”
Basically, they never saw them as "non white" but just lower than them & knew they would assimilateDoes all this mean, as Prof. Roediger suggests, that the old stock did not think the new immigrants were white? The language, religion, appearance, and bathing habits of the newcomers combined to make them alien and even repulsive, but sending a few Sicilians to black schools hardly meant people in the South thought they were actually Negroes. Protestants of British stock did not want to mix with short, dark Catholics, and it was convenient to park them in black schools, and the abortive 1922 anti-miscegenation prosecution is at best a historical curiosity.
As even Prof. Roediger himself recognizes, naturalization laws throughout this period specified that citizenship was open to “free white persons,” and no one ever argued that “Guineas” and “Bohunks” were unqualified. Other races were. In 1922, the Supreme Court ruled that Japanese could not naturalize because they were not white. The next year, a subcontinental Indian came before the court, claiming he was “Caucasian,” and therefore eligible. In earlier cases, the court had sought expert testimony from anthropologists as to who was white, but in the Thind case, the justices ruled that it was simple common sense not to consider Indians white. New immigrants from Europe were unfailingly admitted to citizenship.
The census bureau during this period counted new immigrants the same way. It classified the first generation and their children as “foreign-born white,” but counted the third generation simply as white. This reflected both scholarly and popular assumptions. As a 1932 study by Donald Young called American Minority People noted of the new immigrant, it was “dimly realized that in a few generations he will be absorbed into the total white population.” Young went on to say that the “white immigrant [is] patently handicapped by foreign language and tradition” but the “Negro now is looked on as more of a biological problem.”
Yeah, i shared some more belowI see, yeah I understand it now, thank you for this info.
They did mix a bit, but from what i showed, most of them were taken-back to MENA countries after expulsionLike I said, I would’ve thought they would’ve been seen as “brown” because of the moors invading both Spain and Sicily and possibly race mixing with the locals there.
Ye, also look at this:Right, okay I see.
In historical times, there have been three major invasions of South Eastern Europe from the direction of the Near East but no evidence of major migratory events and gene flow.
Although the Southeastern Mediterranean islands seem to have acted as a bridge from Anatolia to Southern Europe, the relatively small degree of gene flow between the African and the European coasts shows that the Mediterranean Sea also had a barrier function as also suggested with studies of mtDNA polymorphisms (48). Thus, the Mediterranean seems to have facilitated the migrations of Neolithic farmers along its Southern European coast but it mostly acted as an isolating factor between its European and African coasts.
The only important gene flows from Near East to Europe must have occurred in prehistoric times and, as genetic evidence suggests, the most prominent migrations should have occurred during the Neolithic.
I mean in a way yeah but it has roots to do with them being poor as fuckyeah disregard this one lol, I thought it was a racial slur.
Nah no worries mang, i need to find some new copes tbhAlso, sorry for the late response, I’ve been playing black souls a lot(the avi is a character from that game) and I’ve been really hooked on it right now.





