idk but mass shootings are psyops
IMO It was not primarily to control guns, but to be able to compromise law enforcement for future sketchy shit and sketchy measures.
Sandy Hook is also remembered because Niggerbama almost "cried" on TV, another act that was too sketchy to even be believable.
because he is a liar
Even if it's true that Obama was embellishing his emotions, it does not follow that Obama was part of a conspiracy to kill children, or pretend as if children were killed to pass gun control or whatever.
Let me give you another example of Obama's disingenuousness: he went to Flint, Michigan and pretended to drink its contaminated tap water to reassure its residents that it was safe to drink.
In fact, it was not safe to drink. Obama was doing damage control. But it would be ridiculous to claim based off of this that Obama was part of a conspiracy to contaminate the tap water in the first place and cause heavy metal poisoning to everyone in the city.
But this is the equivalent of this thread's logic, tbh
Last edited:
Its simply another detail i noticed, SH is honestly a rabbit hole, too many irregularities, too many holes and inconsistencies for me to believe it, too strange and sketch for me to ignore it.
And you are an authority on regularity, then?
Regularity in emotional expression, regularity in media statements, and I assume regularity in other contexts too, right?
How about Adam Lanza's irregularity? He was a very weird sperg, and it is not at all implausible that he just killed his mother and committed a mass-shooting with her gun as per the official version of events
Too perfect of a stereotype for a mass shooter I would say, and i mean irregularities in the narrative, inconsistencies, and doubts without any clear answers, very solid doubts, the whole thing is simply too strange. (The final nail in the coffin is Alex Jones's 1.8 BIL fine, which they clearly made a example out of him, simply for questioning a set narrative.)And you are an authority on regularity, then?
Regularity in emotional expression, regularity in political statements, and I assume regularity in other contexts too, right?
How about Adam Lanza's irregularity? He was a very weird sperg, and it is not at all implausible that he committed a mass-shooting
Last edited:
Oh, so Adam Lanza was just too normal of a mass-shooter
So something can neither be too irregular or too regular. It needs to be just right.
There needs to be a perfect balance of emotional spontaneity and measured decorum in a media statement, and the perfect balance of autism and charisma in a mass-shooter. Or else it's completely fake!
Nigga wut?
Last edited:
Its simply another detail ive noticed.Oh, so Adam Lanza was just too normal of a mass-shooter.
So something can neither be too irregular or too regular. It needs to be just right.
There needs to be a perfect balance of emotional spontaneity and measured decorum in a media statement, and the perfect balance of autism and charisma in a mass-shooter.
Nigga wut?
Probably Part of the reason SH is so sketchy is because theres so little info, and the strange measures and even straight up malice in the procedure in a incident of this type, It doesnt feel right, pretty deep gut feeling, how do you know Lanza even mercked himself? Under the testimony of people you cant even interview either.
There is also "little info" on Thomas Crooks, who is another infamous sperg shooter. It just so happens that spergs have a small footprint because they're asocial.
But actually, there is a lot of leaked Lanza audio recordings where you can hear his extremely monotone voice and unconventional takes for yourself. I haven't really listened to any of them, though.
No lmao
Maybe Lanza is some kind of schitzo fall guy or some shit, maybe its me, but theres too many questions without answers in SH.
1 Why did special forces "storm" the school, and state police was left almost a mile away from the scene, in incidents of this kind, It has never been proceeded before.
2 Taught by his mom.how to shoot, but dispatch 26 people, pinpoint accuracy, In less than 5 minutes, mercking almost everyone you hit? (Eric and Dylan had more time and ammo, only killed 6 in that same time frame.)
3 you cant interview the paramedics, the first responders at the scene, because you do NOT know who they are.
The real psyops involve shit that actually matter to the ruling class, where literally trillions of dollars are at stake.
If you're interested in the intersection between politics and guns where literally trillions of dollars are at stake, then look no further than foreign policy and the military industrial complex!
The official basis for most wars are completely fabricated, from America's Iraq War to the German invasion of Poland, and specifically meant to elicit an emotional reaction in the masses that will make them comply and get behind the war effort. Those in power literally "generate casus belli" as though they're playing a Paradox Interactive game when it comes to these wars
And the US government spent trillions of dollars funding the "War on Terror" alone, which translated to obscene profit for arms manufacturers, among other special interests!
By comparison, what power does the domestic gun lobby in America have? Its supporters have the conceit that they intend to "resist tyranny" and are the only thing stopping authoritarianism, but America literally has the most prisoners out of any developed country in the world, and an extremely arbitrary and corrupt legal system. They have stopped literally nothing
The gun market in America is largely nothing but an edgy consumer industry, and not really the fulcrum of any sort of conspiracy.
I laughed the other week when I heard the NRA referred to as "the most powerful political lobby in Washington" by a liberal (the most powerful political lobby in Washington is actually AIPAC -- a big advocate for America's involvement in Middle Eastern wars, in particular).
Last edited:
Theres too many doubts, but I leave my final one here..
4 turbo schizoid that "hated" his mother, didnt go ham on her, just coldly executed her operator style before going on his spree, with barely any blood at all, at almost point blank.
Simply my 2 cents.
Last edited:
And liberals talk about how Trump didn't bleed enough after he almost got assassinated, so it must have been fake (meanwhile Trump said in a media interview that he was actually bleeding profusely from his ear, and his doctor explained to him that even a minor injury to the ear or any area of the head will bleed a lot)
Do you see the patterns in conspiratorial thinking here?
Adam Lanza "doesn't have a big footprint" (just like Thomas Crooks). So it must be fake!
There is even the stereotypical conspiracy theory about there being multiple shooters at the Trump assassination, just like there always is whenever there's crossfire and thus reports of multiple shooters (the other shooters are just the police/secret service, JFL).
Last edited:
if you get executed at close range with a gun, there would be a fuckton of blood, it would be everywhere, it would be on the walls even, Adam Lanza's mom? Just a a small pink spot on the bed.And liberals talk about how Trump didn't bleed enough after he almost got assassinated, so it must have been fake (meanwhile Trump said in a media interview that he was actually bleeding profusely from his ear, and his doctor explained to him that even a minor injury to the ear or any area of the head will bleed a lot)
Do you see the patterns in conspiratorial thinking here?
Adam Lanza "doesn't have a big footprint" (just like Thomas Crooks). So it must be fake!
There is even the stereotypical conspiracy theory about there being multiple shooters at the Trump assassination, just like there always is whenever there's crossfire and thus reports of multiple shooters (the other shooters are just the police/secret service, JFL).
Columbine was real, Virginia Tech was, Same with Stoneman Douglas
For me theres simply something too strange in SH to ignore.
Will research it further.
Instead of wasting time on this nonsense, you should look into the real conspiracies that center around foreign policy.
It should interest you to note that conspiracies abound so much in foreign policy, that it's actually socially acceptable for politicians to engage in a sort of projection and publicly endorse conspiracy theories of their own -- intended to make their foreign adversaries look bad, of course.
For example, John McCain and other members of the US foreign policy establishment unironically claim(ed) that Vladamir Putin killed his own people in a fake terrorist attack in order to win his first election
Now, think of it. These same politicians would call that type of conspiracy theory insane in any other context (especially regarding a school shooting -- and rightfully so), but suddenly it's part of the mainstream political discussion when it involves foreign policy and advances their own interests of de-legitimizing an international rival. It reveals a lot about all the dirty shit that they're doing and have done themselves on the international stage.
Last edited:
I know those too.Instead of wasting time on this nonsense, you should look into the real conspiracies that center around foreign policy.
It should interest you to note that conspiracies abound so much in foreign policy, that it's actually socially acceptable for politicians to engage in a sort of projection and publicly endorse conspiracy theories of their own -- intended to make their foreign adversaries look bad, of course.
For example, John McCain and other members of the US foreign policy establishment unironically claim(ed) that Vladamir Putin killed his own people in a fake terrorist attack in order to win his first election
Now, think of it. These same politicians would call that type of theory insane in any other context, but suddenly it's part of the political discussion when it comes to foreign policy. It reveals a lot about the dirty shit that they're doing and have done themselves on the international stage.
"Muh Gaddafi gives his soldiers viagra to rape"
"The 40 Beheaded Babies Goy"
Pretty insidious shit.
It was a fake and gay Obama phyop. Every time there is a democrat in office they run these mass school shootings to try and get the 2nd repealed. I think adam lanza was real though, probably grabbed him off the street to use as a patsy because he was so isolated and "radicalized". Thats how they get their patsy they find single men that are "radicalized" then suddenly mass shooting with shooters using 1000$ of dollars of weapons and ammunition.
That's standard atrocity propaganda, but legitimately deep conspiracies are to be found in foreign policy, featuring the intelligence agencies whose sole purpose is backroom machinations!
Namely, there's a meta-level conspiracy theory about conspiracy theories which claims that the CIA promotes shit like "Sandy Hook was fake" precisely in order to stigmatize those who shine the spotlight on their real conspiracies, like fabricated atrocity propaganda that's meant to justify trillion-dollar wars.
Normies will go, "huh, these conspiracy theorists say that the 40 beheaded babies are fake?! How could that possibly be when they also said that all the dead children in Sandy Hook were fake, which was clearly ridiculous? By golly, I trust the authorities on this one, and can't wait to die for Israel!"
Last edited:
K
sandy hook really gives new meaning to the phrase 'theatre kids'
Relevant to the conspiracy theory discussion:
While I am not opposed to "conspiracy theorising" (which in reality is merely a competing narrative to what is "official"/approved at any given time) it is important to bear in mind that the system could benefit from a conspiratorial mindset and many theories themselves in various ways:
While I am not opposed to "conspiracy theorising" (which in reality is merely a competing narrative to what is "official"/approved at any given time) it is important to bear in mind that the system could benefit from a conspiratorial mindset and many theories themselves in various ways:
- It can make you extremely paranoid/mistrusting, questioning everything beyond yourself, leading to a passive solipsism. This discourages individuals from engaging in co-operative efforts.
- It's demoralising and ultimately defeatist to believe in an all-pervasive evil conspiracy. It's depressing, increases fear/anxiety, mistrust, promotes high time preference behaviour and encourages passivity as "everything is controlled or will be soon enough" or "everyone is either asleep or evil".
- Theories can potentially be invented or promoted by the system to drain the critic's time, energy and money, discredit him or lead him down a false path, effectively concealing voracious/productive lines of inquiry. "Former" establishment media personality David Icke (net worth said to be $10 million) and his "alien reptilian" theory is perhaps the best example of this. Furthermore, a lie discredits the genuine information that he (and more honest figures) provides as it's inherently associated with lunacy and corruption. Icke's wealth and access to mainstream platforms is itself evidence that the system at minimum does not regard him as a threat and at most that he is directly and intentionally advancing their agenda.
No. Looking into Sandy Hook at all will quickly make you suspicious.
yes it happened
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
