Ok I read it.
Its trash.
Why?
- no concrete examples or approaches
- full of raw ideological verbiage, bombarding the reader with value judgements about what is hateful and what is not etc
- mentions incels.is but only cherry picks posts that support their view points (i.e. they pick a bunch of posts by pedos and screenshot them, or they pick posts by ppl compaining about being alone and say this is the core issue).
- They never bring up any of the posts showing research data though.
- Outrageous claims about an epidemic of anti-female violence in society - meanwhile onlyfans has a multi-billion dollar turn over rate annually. Also most victims of male violence are men + IPV symmetry (google it)
Also this book (written by women):
mega.nz
Since these people view the whole issue as ideological, all they have to offer is unjustifiable ideological claims.
Interesting things I found
- they say they have soys on social media larping as right wingers and manosphere dudes, trying to redirect men to "healthier" venues
- they say that they pinpoint and attack specific individuals to de-radicalize them over time (makes me rethink some interactions I had over the years )
- they recommend even more internet censorship using things like AI. This wont work. AI has to be trained on new terminology to learn. Human's dont. If a poser stops using the word "foid" and replaces it with "banana," how would an AI distinguish the 900 different use cases for "banana?" A word can change meaning based on context, gestures, tone of voice, context of thread, time of the year etc. The staggering complexity of language is too much for AI.
Take the sentence "I want to burn witches on a pile of wood with gasoline like its 1668."
Add some slang: "I want to roast some tuna on a campfire with kerosene like its 1994."
AI will not understand the second sentence, but users on this forum would, because context. So for AI to detect the second sentence as evil, it would have to rely on loose associations to determine the correct context (i.e. is it in "incel" context or is the guy talking about going to summer camp as a child?).
The infinite complexity of this will forever stifle AI.
Another way this could go down is similar to the "its ok to be white" slogan. AI can only figure out the meaning behind this by being taught the intention of its creators. On its own, it can not decipher this message, other than taking it literal.
For instance, what if incels stopped talking negatively about women and instead started talking super positive, but
meant it negative. "I looove women, they are so squishy and nice! I want to cuddle them forever yay!"
"GOD I wish i could spoil a bitch!
"
This is why they will never catch up, unless they literally censor everything. Totalitarian measures are the only way, and it is where we are going.
Now back to the PDF: It contains almost no value outside of ideological gibberish, made up metrics to measure how "evil" someone is. All the data suffers from presuppositions about what incels are and what the problem is (i.e. they act like its just an ideology made up by a bunch of angry lonely men - which begs the question why their made-up ideology is superior, but that's too high IQ for them).
Thx for tagging me, I fuk wit da luv crew
View attachment 1149742