Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Decolonization is impossible without ethnonationalism

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

shalom goyim
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
30,123
Online time
15h 38m
In most cases, it is impossible to decolonize without some sort of ethnonationalism.

Most decolonization effort is towards restoring control to the indigenous people. What makes an indigenous people entitled to a land? Who is a "citizen" or not?

What about the colonial descendants that were born here for generations?

I find it ironic that decolonalization is a big thing on left wing circles.
 
The left only supports ethnonationalism when it’s anti-white.

The entire worldview of marxism revolves around the dynamics of the exploitation of the oppressed by the oppressors and their final struggle, which ends with the oppressed destroying their oppressors and reclaiming what they believe has been stolen from them. Originally, this was intended to describe the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, but in the many decades since Marx's time, it has also been extended to the relationship between men (oppressors) and femoids (oppressed), whites (oppressors) and non-whites (oppressed), etc. All of this is done in an effort to deconstruct and destroy every aspect of Western civilization.
 
The left only supports ethnonationalism when it’s anti-white.

The entire worldview of marxism revolves around the dynamics of the exploitation of the oppressed by the oppressors and their final struggle, which ends with the oppressed destroying their oppressors and reclaiming what they believe has been stolen from them. Originally, this was intended to describe the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, but in the many decades since Marx's time, it has also been extended to the relationship between men (oppressors) and femoids (oppressed), whites (oppressors) and non-whites (oppressed), etc. All of this is done in an effort to deconstruct and destroy every aspect of Western civilization.
Marxism and by proxy Bolshevism are a bubonic plague of great significance, an unfortunate ailment that has been transmitted via The Jews. Although, they are correct in the since ascribing to the upperclassmen the epithet of Bolshevism, and the working-class, The Proletariat. The oppressed are provided from a political soapbox from which they are well-guarded and exempt from any sort of critique upon them, anything to the contrary will be vehemently denied, and any other expression of dissidence is met with violent opposition and emasculatory insults. The likes of which have done irreversible damage to society, all codifying Judaic-Zionist and Communistic beliefs.

"The entire worldview of Marxism revolves around the dynamics of the exploitation of the oppressed by the oppressors and their final struggle, which ends with the oppressed destroying their oppressors and reclaiming what they believe has been stolen from them." Although I oppose the other tenets it proposes, I believe it is an otherwise reasonable eventuality to arrive at given the current state of society. It is no surprise that Marx, his colleagues and even contemporaries foresaw not just the denigration, but also the eradication and utter disintegration of Western Civilization. Retrospectively, they were labelled by the cultural zeitgeists as fatalists who subscribed to mass hysteria, but their theorems were eventually proven correct. I will not otherwise concede any winnings to Marxists.

"Only a bourgeois simpleton is capable of imagining that Bolshevism has been exorcised. With his superficial thinking he has no idea that this is an instinctive process; that is, the striving of the Jewish people for world domination, a process which is just as natural as the urge of the Anglo-Saxon to seize domination of the earth. And just as the Anglo-Saxon pursues this course in his own way and carries on the fight with his own weapons, likewise the Jew. He goes his way, the way of sneaking in among the nations and boring from within, and he fights with his weapons, with lies and slander, poison and corruption, intensifying the struggle to the point of bloodily exterminating his hated foes." - Adolf Hitler, 1924.
 
Last edited:
Marxism and by proxy Bolshevism are a bubonic plague of great significance, an unfortunate ailment that has been transmitted via The Jews. Although, they are correct in the since ascribing to the upperclassmen the epithet of Bolshevism, and the working-class, The Proletariat. The oppressed are provided from a political soapbox from which they are well-guarded and exempt from any sort of critique upon them, anything to the contrary will be vehemently denied, and any other expression of dissidence is met with violent opposition and emasculatory insults. The likes of which have done irreversible damage to society, all codifying Judaic-Zionist and Communistic beliefs.

"The entire worldview of marxism revolves around the dynamics of the exploitation of the oppressed by the oppressors and their final struggle, which ends with the oppressed destroying their oppressors and reclaiming what they believe has been stolen from them." Although I oppose the other tenets it proposes, I believe it is an otherwise reasonable eventuality to arrive at given the current state of society. It is no surprise that Marx, his colleagues and even contemporaries foresaw not just the denigration, but also the eradication and utter disintegration of Western Civilization. Retrospectively, they were labelled by the cultural zeitgeists as fatalists who subscribed to mass hysteria, but their theorems were eventually proven correct. I will not otherwise concede any winnings to Marxists.

"Only a bourgeois simpleton is capable of imagining that Bolshevism has been exorcised. With his superficial thinking he has no idea that this is an instinctive process; that is, the striving of the Jewish people for world domination, a process which is just as natural as the urge of the Anglo-Saxon to seize domination of the earth. And just as the Anglo-Saxon pursues this course in his own way and carries on the fight with his own weapons, likewise the Jew. He goes his way, the way of sneaking in among the nations and boring from within, and he fights with his weapons, with lies and slander, poison and corruption, intensifying the struggle to the point of bloodily exterminating his hated foes." - Adolf Hitler, 1924.
Hh
 
The left only supports ethnonationalism when it’s anti-white.
Not always. Many people in the IRA are white and they're ethnonationalist leftists who had support from international leftist circles
 
Peole have been brainwashed to think that ethnonationalism is evil.
 
"With his superficial thinking he has no idea that this is an instinctive process; that is, the striving of the Jewish people for world domination, a process which is just as natural as the urge of the Anglo-Saxon to seize domination of the earth. And just as the Anglo-Saxon pursues this course in his own way and carries on the fight with his own weapons, likewise the Jew. He goes his way, the way of sneaking in among the nations and boring from within, and he fights with his weapons, with lies and slander, poison and corruption, intensifying the struggle to the point of bloodily exterminating his hated foes." - Adolf Hitler, 1924.
The main difference between the two races is that one uses deception, and one had a jumpstart from which to dominate the world, they are both naturally inclined to narcissm and psycopathy, they tell themselves that they are the superior race above all others, and if allowed to have their way, the rest of the world would be slowly and painfully bled out. If (((current rulers))) fall, their parallels will simply fill the power vacuum. What will OP think when he and everyone who looks like him is dehumanized, enslaved, tortured, and stolen from (and after being stolen from, told that they didn't have a right to their own resources as they were supposedly not going to ever put them to 'good' use) until death?

Afrocentric features are fucking ugly, but the negroes aren't completely wrong about certain things.

On one hand, I could see how one could dislike a (((dishonest))) enemy, being gaslit about your own suffering and being blamed for what is done to you sucks (their parellels already do this tbh), but at the same time, is it really a good sign when your enemy is confident and powerful enough to openly admit their hatred without punishment? If your enemy is so secure in their power that they can be honest about things, is that a good sign?

IDK TBH
 
Last edited:
Peole have been brainwashed to think that ethnonationalism is evil.
Jews would have you believe miscegenation is a natural process, by which integration necessitated, that one should intermix, and allow their genes to be sufficiently blotted out and eradicated. Blacks, primarily an example of this, for they are, albeit, successful biological weapons of warfare, who act as a distention for The Jews to use, with seemingly interminable will to see the complete exsanguination of The White Man. It should be noted that Ethnonationalistic interests, although, increasingly divided should all descend upon one premise, and that is of course the segregation (not of arbitration of classes, or discriminatory-based classism), but effectively Isolationism, of the Japanese variety.

Should cultural and racial exchange be surceased, and interactions between either race be diminished, it would decrease the promulgation of crime significantly. The concept of “Racism” is Trotskyist Dogma, many are liberal in their usage of it, both figuratively and literally, though many are semantic in it’s usage as it bears no literal meaning and is a shorthand for “those who oppose current racial politics”. It is a recursive loop, diluted even further by Bolshevistic tendencies.

Race is objectively, a group united by common ancestry, similar lineages. Delineations of course, hold the fallacious view that “Race is a social construct”. Because of Marxist and Judaic-Zionists, and anything golem doing the bidding of Jews, race is understood almost exclusively through the American lens, and observed phenotypically through The Negro. The predominance to interpret race under sociolinguistic demarcations, are a result of the aforementioned parasitoids. (All of which are derived from The Ideological Left, as I would put it.) Race can generally be considered low-resolution views of relatedness, but are generally one coherent taxonomy, nonetheless. All concepts are manmade, it is however, rather trivial, and quite dishonest to call Race a purely manmade construct, when the distinction was made, not to denote class, but to extrapolate groups on the basis of genealogical roadmaps. Subdivisions of Humans exist, because not all of us originate from the same Hominid species.
 
The main difference between the two races is that one uses deception, and one had a jumpstart from which to dominate the world, they are both naturally inclined to narcissm and psycopathy, they tell themselves that they are the superior race above all others, and if allowed to have their way, the rest of the world would be slowly and painfully bled out. If (((current rulers))) fall, their parallels will simply fill the power vacuum. What will OP think when he and everyone who looks like him is dehumanized, enslaved, tortured, and stolen from (and after being stolen from, told that they didn't have a right to their own resources as they were supposedly not going to ever put them to 'good' use) until death?

Afrocentric features are fucking ugly, but the negroes aren't completely wrong about certain things.

On one hand, I could see how one could dislike a (((dishonest))) enemy, being gaslit about your own suffering and being blamed for what is done to you sucks (their parellels already do this tbh), but at the same time, is it really a good sign when your enemy is confident and powerful enough to openly admit their hatred without punishment? If your enemy is so secure in their power that they can be honest about things, is that a good sign?

IDK TBH
Thoroughly agree with everything said here.
 
Not always. Many people in the IRA are white and they're ethnonationalist leftists who had support from international leftist circles
The Left polemicizes Whites in particular, irregardless of contingent beliefs, are because Whiteness in particular has and always will be demonized. If you are even so much as aware of your own heritage, then, according to “The Left”, (which isn’t even The Left, which I will elaborate on in upcoming threads), should hastily be punished and terminated for singularity of thought.
 
I just wish being right wing wasn't associated with being muh white supremacist, no, I don't want to side with feminists and troons because I am not 100% pure bavarian or whatever.
 
I just wish being right wing wasn't associated with being muh white supremacist, no, I don't want to side with feminists and troons because I am not 100% pure bavarian or whatever.
Many ethnics are right wing extremists, the groyper movement for example
 
The left only supports ethnonationalism when it’s anti-white.
don't support any ethnostates
i want to utterly annihilate the ethnostate called israel and many don't consider them white
 
don't support any ethnostates
i want to utterly annihilate the ethnostate called israel and many don't consider them white
The left considers Israelis to be white.

They often compare Zionism to European settler colonialism.

Regardless, it is true that Biblical Jews are genetically closer to modern Palestinians than modern Jews.
 
Indigenous people are savages who live in huts and hunt with spears and how is the economically viable for a nations prosperity ?
 
Marcus Garveypilled
 
Not always. Many people in the IRA are white and they're ethnonationalist leftists who had support from international leftist circles
shhh let SFcels continue thinking whites are victims
 
Indigenous people are savages who live in huts and hunt with spears and how is the economically viable for a nations prosperity ?
1754540556686
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
24
Views
727
nihilum
nihilum
MaldireMan0077
Replies
2
Views
474
Aspiring Janitor
Aspiring Janitor
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
11
Views
836
AutismKing
AutismKing
MaldireMan0077
Replies
3
Views
652
nihilum
nihilum

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top