Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Debunking Stewer Stomper's argument on racial differences in grey matter volume (GMV) of key ROIs among white people and black people

Any purposeful attempt to remove a ethnic, religious, or cultural group from existence. Such as purposefully diminishing the white race or native Europeans through supporting mass immigration and engineering society to decline their birthrate, like you support
Even going by this retarded definition which ignores that a genocide requires mass ethnic cleansing, what's going on with immigration still does not fit the bill since there is no "purposeful attempt" to reduce white populations. Whatever little demographic change that happens is simply a side effect.

It's not that people who enact immigration do it primarily to make white populations wither away. They just don't care about that demographic outcome as much as you do. It's nowhere near close to their list of priorities. Get. Over. Yourself.
 
there is no "purposeful attempt" to reduce white populations.
It's not a fucking accident. You can't gaslight me like this.
Screenshot 2025 03 09 18 17 02 73 e5d3893ac03954c6bb675ef2555b879b2

1746646046860c

Screenshot 2025 10 02 10 43 54 57 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12

Screenshot 2025 06 28 18 01 28 70 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f92
Screenshot 2025 06 11 06 19 47 03 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 06 09 06 35 33 31 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 05 14 05 12 26 59 f9ee0578fe1cc94de7482bd41accb3292
Screenshot 2025 03 09 18 16 49 52 e5d3893ac03954c6bb675ef2555b879b3
Screenshot 2025 06 09 13 42 11 26 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 06 09 13 42 43 02 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 09 25 09 03 53 66 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12
Screenshot 2025 09 25 09 06 18 07 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12
Screenshot 2025 06 11 09 13 07 36 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b122
Screenshot 2025 06 11 09 12 57 58 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 06 11 09 13 10 03 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b122
Screenshot 2025 08 28 16 32 59 91 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 05 05 15 30 03 71 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 05 05 15 29 59 24 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
 
Whatever little demographic change that happens
You admitted yourself it's literal white extinction, we won't have countries where we are the majority of the population or the state anywhere, we will face death with no state to protect us from outnumbering hoards of hostile foreigners. You know this, though. You already said it was white extinction, now you downplay it as "little demographic change". I'm not falling for it
 


Yeah. It's the jews ain't it. A population of 16 million people with barely a nation of their own are deliberately perpetrating the "genocide" of the most dominant, powerful and one of the most populous races on the planet. Makes perfect sense. I'm sure this is the reason immigration exists and not the 100s of other geopolitical and economic factors. It's just a ploy to get back at white people for......some reason I guess :feelsseriously:

You admitted yourself it's literal white extinction,

Whenever I say that I only accept your own logic at face value to analyse the claims surrounding it. Of course I don't actually believe that the white race is going to go anywhere anytime soon despite all the fear mongering.

More than half of these articles from some inconsequential woke magaizens are talking about promoting representation. How is that proof of a deliberate ploy on the top levels to lower white populations backed by direct policy action?
 
Last edited:
How is that proof of a deliberate ploy on the top levels to lower white populations that is followed up with direct policy action?
What do you think about jewish NGOs like the ADL and Open Society Foundation that have been openly and successfully promoted immigration in western countries for decades?
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • infotable-frankfurt-school.webp
    713.4 KB · Views: 24
  • infotable-lgbt.webp
    398.5 KB · Views: 22
What do you think about jewish NGOs like the ADL and Open Society Foundation that have been openly and successfully promoting immigration in western countries for decades?
Well, for one I am not fully aware if these organisations actually do promote immigration. And if they claim to do so, one can analyse exactly what actions they took and how effective they actually were at promoting immigration and their overall role in all of this. As for their motives, one can only guess.

Ok, even if we assume that there is an element of demographic change there , in the name of toning down white supremacy and racism (which is the same as muh "white genocide" in the eyes of a white nationalist/supremacist) , none of this would be possible without the explicit permission of the white dominated western governments.

You'd have to believe that actually jews rule over white people for that to make sense.......oh wait
 
Last edited:
I am not fully aware if these organisations actually do promote immigration
HIAS has Hebrew in the fucking name it was in the images if you read any of them.
 
Sewer Stomper really cooked 6 million in this thread.
 

Look buddy. I have the race that used to sit over global colonial empires on one side and a bunch of semites that haven't even reached pre WW2 population levels on the other. If you want me to believe in such absurdities, atleast give me something more than a bunch of screencaps with a star photoshopped over people's heads on them.

And no, a bunch of jews being woke and another bunch of jews trying to help immigrants is not proof of a top level deliberate conspiracy to eradicate white people. Or that immigrant's primary purpose is to achieve that demographic outcome for reasons no one can fathom.


Jews being a successful minority in US also doesn't change the fact that it's a white dominant country. Even the wokeness in America primarily comes from woke whites.
 
atleast give me something more than a bunch of screencaps with a star photoshopped over people's heads on them
So I guess giving the specific positions and names of Jews with influence doesn't mean anything. "I don't care so it doesn't matter" than there's literally nothing more to give you. If I can show for example every single top member of blackrock is Jewish, and you'll purposefully refuse to understand what it means and say "that's just stars on people's faces!" there's no conversation to be had. You're a retard who wants to worship kikes
 
View attachment 1646316
This is the real reason you support mass immigration. If you hate women, fine, I do too. But I don't want to get dragged down with them. I don't want to be murdered by niggers just because you get off on the rape/death of white women. We can oppress women without letting in niggers
I refer back to these as a erasure of any credibility you have that you may care about our countries or not just want white people to die. You only talk to support the death of whites who you resent, not because of any genuine convictions that you're right.
 
So I guess giving the specific positions and names of Jews with influence doesn't mean anything.
It means nothing if you want to claim that jews decide migration policy of western nations. As I said before, whiny victim complex that is built on nothing but bullshit.
 
It means nothing if you want to claim that jews decide migration policy of western nations. As I said before, whiny victim complex that is built on nothing but bullshit.
I already showed all of that. The Jewish NGOs supporting mass immigration, UN policy, specific Jewish cases, the fact Jews have such high influence on government. There's nothing that could satisfy you.

 
So I guess giving the specific positions and names of Jews with influence doesn't mean anything. "I don't care so it doesn't matter" than there's literally nothing more to give you. If I can show for example every single top member of blackrock is Jewish, and you'll purposefully refuse to understand what it means and say "that's just stars on people's faces!" there's no conversation to be had. You're a retard who wants to worship kikes
It's actually funny how a bunch of jews in position of power are treated as an anomaly but white people dominating all the government structures in western governments AND international institutions is just assumed as normal.


And we are supposed to believe that jews are the ones bringing in immigrants and enacting pro immigrant policies. In parliament's and congresses that are explicitly white dominant
 
a bunch of jews in position of power are treated as an anomaly
Yeah because as you said these are white majority countries, the point is Jews being extremely extremely overrepresented in power in the government, politics, media, finances, education system, NGOs, elites, exc.

but white people dominating all the government structures
Yeah cause these are fucking white countries. "Hmmmm this country is majority white but man it's so weird that the government is mostly white. Shouldn't it be mostly Pakistani?" No man I don't think so
 
, the point is Jews being extremely extremely overrepresented in power in the government, politics, media, finances, education system, NGOs, elites, exc.
Over representation is not a proof of dominance.

.


Yeah cause these are fucking white countries. "Hmmmm this country is majority white but man it's so weird that the government is mostly white. Shouldn't it be mostly Pakistani?" No man I don't think so
So you admit that white dominant governments are the ones enacting pro immigration policies in white countries. And you also believe that these policies have primary purpose of demographic change (an absurd claim in and of itself). Looks like a case of mass suicide to me :rolleyes: or maybe they just don't care about "muh white genocide"
 
It means nothing if you want to claim that jews decide migration policy of western nations. As I said before, whiny victim complex that is built on nothing but bullshit.
They wormed their way into key positions of power using bribery flattery and all other forms of cunning unbeknownst to the general white public, us talking about it and making light of it isnt us being trying to cry victim, its an attempt to shine light on an issue and take accountability for what happened and regain power in our countries.
How is it a victim complex to fight against your oppressor? If someone has wronged you and has wronged the people you care about its your duty to fight back.
 
And you also believe that these policies have primary purpose of demographic change
>Open borders to tens of millions of illegals
>UN says we need multiculturalism
>EU must "undermine national homogeineity" of European countries
>Jewish NGOs and billionaires sponsor and fund mass immigration

Oh man I wonder why they would do that idk
 
regain power in our countries.
Wait, you actually do believe that jews control your nations. I don't know what I can say to that except maybe some people live in their own versions of reality I guess. It's like someone comes upto you and says unicorns are hunting me. How do you even react?

It's a primary example of victim complexes leading to delusions. I guess the white people in power, ruling over the most powerful nation in history that wages international wars, covert operations, regime changes and soft diplomacy , were too naive and stupid and fell for jewish bribery and cajoling until jews took over both the executive and legislative branches to hatch their evil plan to destroy whites via.....immigration? You'd think they would start killing off whites on the streets but it's fucking Pablo the car mechanic and his 4 kids that will bring about the famed white genocide

Or maybe, the white majority country is actually ruled by whites. And the people ruling over it allow for certain degree of immigration for whatever purposes that have nothing to do with "genociding" their own race. Because they don't give af about minor demographic shifts. You can tell me which version appears more sane
 
Last edited:
Wait, you actually do believe that jews control your nations. I don't know what I can say to that except maybe some people live in their own versions of reality I guess. It's like someone comes upto you and says unicorns are hunting me. How do you even react?

It's a primary example of victim complexes leading to delusions. I guess the white people in power, ruling over the most powerful nation in history that wages international wars, covert operations, regime changes and soft diplomacy , were too naive and stupid and fell for jewish bribery and cajoling until jews took over both the executive and legislative branches to enact their evil plan to destroy whites via.....immigration?

Or maybe, the white majority country is actually ruled by whites. And the people ruling over it allow for certain degree of immigration for whatever purposes that have nothing to do with "genociding" their own race. You can tell me which version appears more sane
Its not as black and white as you are making it seem but they certainly have a lot of unjust influence in western counties that is at the detriment of white people.
I mean there is enough evidence in this thread to prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt if you were really interested in having an honest discussion.
To me immigration and demographics are the most important issue, a nation is what it is because of its people, if you change the people you change the nation. A nation that is primarily filled with non-whites is not a white nation, so anyone who advocates this is an enemy. Of course jews also promote a myriad of other things that I disagree with but this is the thing I oppose the most.
I mean you've already been shown that jews are overrepesented in U.S. politics. No jews dont control every single aspect of every white country's government, that would be absurd to claim that, but to deny the level of influence they have is just disingenuous.
 
Last edited:
Its not as black and white as you are making it seem but they certainly have a lot of unjust influence in western counties that is at the detriment of white people.
Even if we assume that this is true. How is it at the "detriment of white people"? Objectively speaking that is.

I mean there is enough evidence in this thread to prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt if you were really interested in having an honest discussion.
No there isn't actually. It's all propaganda to promote a certain narrative that falls apart when you question the narrative itself instead of letting the cherrypicked spam overwhelm your brain.

So some jews are woke (as if white people aren't) and some jews support immigration or are sympathetic to immigrants (as if white people don't) and many jews occupy positions in American systems (as if American systems are not still white dominant). How does that support any narrative?

Heck, what about the Jews who are not woke and don't support immigration?

. A nation that is primarily filled with non-whites is not a white nation, so anyone who advocates this is an enemy.
They are only enemies if you adopt the idea that a nation should remain a white nation. And if you do that then maybe the Jews who actually do cheer demographic change have a point because you have relegated them to second class people in their own country. It's not hard to see why these specific jews that are posted in this thread are the way they are. You let the slippery slope go on and suddenly you have another moustache man stuffing you in gas chambers with explicit approval from people such as yourself, because in the white nations only whites should exist

but to deny the level of influence they have is just disingenuous.

I don't deny it. I just question the narrative which presents jews (and that is the whole group) as the center of attention in all of this.

Of course I know WHY this narrative exists. Because the whole white genocide fantasy will come crashing down like Titanic when hit with the iceberg of reality that the whatever little immigration that is happening in the west is approved by their white governments.
 
Last edited:
There's some nuance here. Acknowledging that a majority group exists in your country is not the same as making your country about that majority group.
True, though in practice making sure that that isn't the case is always going to be a task.

If "white nations" were simply nations with majority white people then the whole anti-immigration nationalist rhetoric would become meaningless.
Not necessarily I think. Using that logic, no nation would have a right to oppose immigration, which of course isn't what see IRL, as there are people having Western-style discourse about their ethnic groups being threatened by immigrants basically everywhere in the world.


View: https://x.com/akarlin/status/1851054159853736228



Even going by this retarded definition which ignores that a genocide requires mass ethnic cleansing,
By the more stringent definitions, yes, but WNs have for quite a while been claiming that the more liberal definition of genocide according to the Genocide Convention from 1948:

Specifically the bolded parts, would fit what leftwing and pro-immigration politicians (and the Jews, according to many of them) have been doing to white-majority countries. Dunno if it really fits, but that's the argument.

Whatever little demographic change that happens is simply a side effect.
Just a nitpick, but it's nowhere near little.

1768667156785
1768667026511


Pointing out that a lot of those immigrants, at least in Europe, are other Europeans would be a better counter.

White nationalists WANT it to be so, but it'll probably never happen because white supremacy will frizzle out in a globalising world filled with chinks Jeets and niggers
White supremacy would, but white identity would, if anything, become stronger. A lack of external pressure amplifies internal fissures, while external pressure makes them disappear.

There's a reason why it was at the peak of white power that white ethnicities have seen each other as highly different people while utterly ignoring the diverse identities of Africans, Indians, Native Americans and so on, culminating in WWII and the questionable fate of the unquestionably white Slavs had the Nazis won it. Meanwhile, in my lifetime I've seen Europe itself stumble towards more and more integration, EEs going from the number one feared immigrant boogeyman to more-or-less just other Europeans, "white" gradually increasing in importance as identity in relation to the traditional ethnic/national ones, and so on, all of it coincidentally happening along with this:


View: https://x.com/BrankoMilan/status/2011119580039589929#m


Which, of course, we can also see on the other end. I remember there being actually studies showing that Sub-Saharan African countries vote together as a block at the UN more often than any other regional group (along with "black" and "African" being seen as much less diverse identities than "European" or "Asian"), which makes sense, since even the average upper-mid-tier non-SSA country has the economic and technological power to throw the entirety of SSA around like a ragdoll.

1768672230410


This is the real reason you support mass immigration. If you hate women, fine, I do too. But I don't want to get dragged down with them. I don't want to be murdered by niggers just because you get off on the rape/death of white women. We can oppress women without letting in niggers
Yeah, that's what it ultimately boils down to. I've been blackpilled pretty hard on the importance of living in a country that is, at least somewhat, ruled and administered by your own people after reading how pitiful my ethnic/national group's standing was for centuries in the middle and early modern ages, and how we were ruthlessly dominated by German settlers. And that was with a group my ancestors could LARP and pass as. Redoing that with a completely different group that would also be influenced by popular media to see my ethnic group as just another evil racist imperialist white oppressors who need to be opposed and dismantled isn't an enticing offer to my eyes:feelsjuice:.

Maybe you mean the EU? Idk, because America is winning right now.
The EU's global share GDP is declining in both nominal and PPP terms, America's only in the latter, though that's partly because the dollar is widely seen as highly overvalued. We'll see how it shakes out in the next few years.
 
Using that logic, no nation would have a right to oppose immigration,
Not true. There are plenty of ways to oppose immigration without bringing up ethnicity. The demographic rhetoric does exist in many non-western nations too. And that makes sense because these ethnicities and cultures have existed even before nations were formed around them. Nationalism itself has ethnic roots. But I specifically talk of western liberal democracies when I say that they've abandoned that kind of thinking. You'd be branded a racist (and rightfully so) if your reasoning for anti-immigration involves racial preservation.

I extend this logic to all nations but that's just my personal belief. I care less about the demographic shift itself and more about the material forces behind them. A substantially large number of Somalians do not "just end up" in Kenya. Another question being who benefits from telling people that having Somalians in Kenya is a bad thing.
By the more stringent definitions, yes, but WNs have for quite a while been claiming that the more liberal definition of genocide according to the Genocide Convention from 1948:


Specifically the bolded parts, would fit what leftwing and pro-immigration politicians (and the Jews, according to many of them) have been doing to white-majority countries. Dunno if it really fits, but that's the argument.
For this to be true one would have to assume some intentionality here. Which just doesn't show up. Immigrants, minorities or jews in the west are not on any kind of level playing field from which a genocide can be enacted. Meanwhile actual genocides are going on in Palestine and Sudan even as I type this. No such situation has arisen (yet) in the west where ethnicities actually are at each other's throat. It's a boogeyman story.

.



Pointing out that a lot of those immigrants, at least in Europe, are other Europeans would be a better counter.
A race nationalist American couldn't tell the difference tbh.

White supremacy would, but white identity would, if anything, become stronger.

This is a tangent but I don't see the difference. White identity IS white supremacy. Can't have one without the other. There is no political position that bases itself on protecting whites or white identity that isn't immediately also about protecting the various financial and social privelages of being born white.

People fundamentally don't realise how fickle this identity thing is. All white people have to do is strictly breed with a non-white person and the whole identity would collapse within a single generation. And not a single shot need be fired, no genocide necessary. Same goes for Somalians and Kenyans. It usually doesn't happen because people see themselves as different communities, defined by their ideological superstructure (culture, customs) which is rooted in the particular historical material process behind it. And what relations of economic production lead to the superstructure of white identity if not superiority over other races.

.
.

There's a reason why it was at the peak of white power that white ethnicities have seen each other as highly different people while utterly ignoring the diverse identities of Africans, Indians, Native Americans and so on, culminating in WWII and the questionable fate of the unquestionably white Slavs had the Nazis won it. Meanwhile, in my lifetime I've seen Europe itself stumble towards more and more integration, EEs going from the number one feared immigrant boogeyman to more-or-less just other Europeans, "white" gradually increasing in importance as identity in relation to the traditional ethnic/national ones, and so on, all of it coincidentally happening along with this:


View: https://x.com/BrankoMilan/status/2011119580039589929#m


Which, of course, we can also see on the other end. I remember there being actually studies showing that Sub-Saharan African countries vote together as a block at the UN more often than any other regional group (along with "black" and "African" being seen as much less diverse identities than "European" or "Asian"), which makes sense, since even the average upper-mid-tier non-SSA country has the economic and technological power to throw the entirety of SSA around like a ragdoll.

It's a plausible theory. I see this trend as more of a stepping stone towards globalisation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →