Let's look at this statement for example. Your logic makes no sense whatsoever
Claim 3:
"Truth:
Proportional to the Asian population; "11 times less likely" is a proportionately good response rate considering Asians were 6% of the U.S. population (at the time of this study) compared to whites being ~72%. [72/6=12] The expected response rate is 12 times less likely, meaning when comparing two Equivalent men, the Asian actually performed better than the white man in this experiment. Part 2 has a low sample size and uses less objectively equivalent men, hence the title "Comparing white and Asian friends" instead of "Comparing two top models".
"
And if the experiment was run in any east asian country, the white guy would do equally good or even better. See how this argument obviously makes no sense?